45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.

      Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Publication Bias, Review Literature as Topic

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To present the contour-enhanced funnel plot as an aid to differentiating asymmetry due to publication bias from that due to other factors. An enhancement to the usual funnel plot is proposed that allows the statistical significance of study estimates to be considered. Contour lines indicating conventional milestones in levels of statistical significance (e.g., <0.01, <0.05, <0.1) are added to funnel plots. This contour overlay aids the interpretation of the funnel plot. For example, if studies appear to be missing in areas of statistical nonsignificance, then this adds credence to the possibility that the asymmetry is due to publication bias. Conversely, if the supposed missing studies are in areas of higher statistical significance, this would suggest the cause of the asymmetry may be more likely to be due to factors other than publication bias, such as variable study quality. We believe this enhancement to funnel plots (i) is simple to implement, (ii) is widely applicable, (iii) greatly improves interpretability, and (iv) should be used routinely.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          18538991
          10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010

          Chemistry
          Data Interpretation, Statistical,Humans,Meta-Analysis as Topic,Publication Bias,Review Literature as Topic

          Comments

          Comment on this article