Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

Evaluation of the soft tissue treatment simulation module of a computerized cephalometric program

Read this article at

Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Objective:

      The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the treatment simulation module of Quick Ceph Studio (QCS) program to the actual treatment results in Class II Division 1 patients.

      Design:

      Retrospective study.

      Materials and Methods:

      Twenty-six skeletal Class II patients treated with functional appliances were included. T0 and T1 lateral cephalograms were digitized using QCS. Before applying treatment simulation to the digitized cephalograms, the actual T0-T1 difference was calculated for the SNA, SNB, ANB angles, maxillary incisor inclination, and protrusion and mandibular incisor inclination and protrusion values. Next, using the treatment simulation module, the aforementioned values for the T0 cephalograms were manually entered to match the actual T1 values taking into account the T0-T1 differences. Paired sample t-test were applied to determine the difference between actual and treatment simulation measurements.

      Results:

      No significant differences were found for the anteroposterior location of the landmarks. Upper lip, soft tissue A point, soft tissue pogonion, and soft tissue B point measurements showed statistically significant difference between actual and treatment simulation in the vertical plane.

      Conclusion:

      Quick Ceph program was reliable in terms of reflecting the sagittal changes that would probably occur with treatment and growth. However, vertical positions of the upper lip, soft tissue pogonion, soft tissue A point, and soft tissue B point were statistically different from actual results.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 28

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

      G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.
        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age.

         J A McNamara (1981)
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis.

          A random sample of 79 British 12-year-old children was studied from tracings registered in the natural head position (NHP). The angle between the Frankfort horizontal (FH) and the horizontal at right angles to the plumb line was measured. Two experienced assessors checked every tracing; for those children perceived to show unnatural head position this was adjusted to what they considered to be the natural head orientation (NHO). The NHO was defined as the head orientation of the subject perceived by the clinician, based on general experience, as the NHP in a standing, relaxed body and head posture, when the subject is looking at a distant point at eye level. The FHK horizontal angle was then measured, now related to the corrected head position. The standard deviation for the latter angle was smaller than that of the uncorrected, but still too large for the FH to be considered reliable as a basis for clinical cephalometric analysis. No statistically significant difference in variability as found between FH and the sella-nasion line. The extracranial horizontal plane related to NHO was recommended as the least variable of the references studied.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            [1 ]Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkiye
            [2 ]Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye
            Author notes
            Correspondence: Dr. Aslihan Zeynep Oz Email: aslihanzeynepoz@ 123456gmail.com
            Journal
            Eur J Dent
            Eur J Dent
            EJD
            European Journal of Dentistry
            Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
            1305-7456
            1305-7464
            Apr-Jun 2014
            : 8
            : 2
            : 229-233
            4054055
            EJD-8-229
            10.4103/1305-7456.130614
            Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

            Categories
            Original Article

            Dentistry

            soft tissue changes, treatment simulation, computerized cephalometry

            Comments

            Comment on this article