14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      An integrative phylogenomic approach illuminates the evolutionary history of cockroaches and termites (Blattodea)

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Phylogenetic relationships among subgroups of cockroaches and termites are still matters of debate. Their divergence times and major phenotypic transitions during evolution are also not yet settled. We addressed these points by combining the first nuclear phylogenomic study of termites and cockroaches with a thorough approach to divergence time analysis, identification of endosymbionts, and reconstruction of ancestral morphological traits and behaviour. Analyses of the phylogenetic relationships within Blattodea robustly confirm previously uncertain hypotheses such as the sister-group relationship between Blaberoidea and remaining Blattodea, and Lamproblatta being the closest relative to the social and wood-feeding Cryptocercus and termites. Consequently, we propose new names for various clades in Blattodea: Cryptocercus + termites = Tutricablattae; Lamproblattidae + Tutricablattae = Kittrickea; and Blattoidea + Corydioidea = Solumblattodea. Our inferred divergence times contradict previous studies by showing that most subgroups of Blattodea evolved in the Cretaceous, reducing the gap between molecular estimates of divergence times and the fossil record. On a phenotypic level, the blattodean ground-plan is for egg packages to be laid directly in a hole while other forms of oviposition, including ovovivipary and vivipary, arose later. Finally, other changes in egg care strategy may have allowed for the adaptation of nest building and other novelties.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Pruning Rogue Taxa Improves Phylogenetic Accuracy: An Efficient Algorithm and Webservice

          The presence of rogue taxa (rogues) in a set of trees can frequently have a negative impact on the results of a bootstrap analysis (e.g., the overall support in consensus trees). We introduce an efficient graph-based algorithm for rogue taxon identification as well as an interactive webservice implementing this algorithm. Compared with our previous method, the new algorithm is up to 4 orders of magnitude faster, while returning qualitatively identical results. Because of this significant improvement in scalability, the new algorithm can now identify substantially more complex and compute-intensive rogue taxon constellations. On a large and diverse collection of real-world data sets, we show that our method yields better supported reduced/pruned consensus trees than any competing rogue taxon identification method. Using the parallel version of our open-source code, we successfully identified rogue taxa in a set of 100 trees with 116 334 taxa each. For simulated data sets, we show that when removing/pruning rogue taxa with our method from a tree set, we consistently obtain bootstrap consensus trees as well as maximum-likelihood trees that are topologically closer to the respective true trees.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Death of an order: a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic study confirms that termites are eusocial cockroaches.

            Termites are instantly recognizable mound-builders and house-eaters: their complex social lifestyles have made them incredibly successful throughout the tropics. Although known as 'white ants', they are not ants and their relationships with other insects remain unclear. Our molecular phylogenetic analyses, the most comprehensive yet attempted, show that termites are social cockroaches, no longer meriting being classified as a separate order (Isoptera) from the cockroaches (Blattodea). Instead, we propose that they should be treated as a family (Termitidae) of cockroaches. It is surprising to find that a group of wood-feeding cockroaches has evolved full sociality, as other ecologically dominant fully social insects (e.g. ants, social bees and social wasps) have evolved from solitary predatory wasps.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Constraining uncertainty in the timescale of angiosperm evolution and the veracity of a Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution

              Summary Through the lens of the fossil record, angiosperm diversification precipitated a Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution (KTR) in which pollinators, herbivores and predators underwent explosive co‐diversification. Molecular dating studies imply that early angiosperm evolution is not documented in the fossil record. This mismatch remains controversial. We used a Bayesian molecular dating method to analyse a dataset of 83 genes from 644 taxa and 52 fossil calibrations to explore the effect of different interpretations of the fossil record, molecular clock models, data partitioning, among other factors, on angiosperm divergence time estimation. Controlling for different sources of uncertainty indicates that the timescale of angiosperm diversification is much less certain than previous molecular dating studies have suggested. Discord between molecular clock and purely fossil‐based interpretations of angiosperm diversification may be a consequence of false precision on both sides. We reject a post‐Jurassic origin of angiosperms, supporting the notion of a cryptic early history of angiosperms, but this history may be as much as 121 Myr, or as little as 23 Myr. These conclusions remain compatible with palaeobotanical evidence and a more general KTR in which major groups of angiosperms diverged later within the Cretaceous, alongside the diversification of pollinators, herbivores and their predators.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Proc. R. Soc. B
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                January 30 2019
                January 30 2019
                : 286
                : 1895
                : 20182076
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP50, 75005 Paris, France
                [2 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Tennessee, Dabney Hall, 1416 Circle Dr., Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
                [3 ]Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Vor dem Neutor 1, 07743 Jena, Germany
                [4 ]Center for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
                [5 ]CR2P (Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie – Paris), MNHN – CNRS – Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, MNHN, CNRS, Paris, France
                [6 ]Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, CP38, 75005 Paris, France
                [7 ]Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research (ZMB), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
                [8 ]Sugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukuba, 1278-294 Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan
                [9 ]Federated Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey and NJIT, 195 University Ave, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
                [10 ]BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, People's Republic of China
                [11 ]Steinmann-Institute, Institute for Paleontology, University of Bonn, Nussallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany
                [12 ]Animal Ecology and Conservation, Zoological Institute, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
                [13 ]Biosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [14 ]Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Friedensplatz 1, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany
                [15 ]Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
                [16 ]Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
                [17 ]Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia (NRCA), Acton, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
                [18 ]Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I, University of Freiburg, Hauptstr. 1, 79104 Freiburg (Brsg.), Germany
                Article
                10.1098/rspb.2018.2076
                6364590
                30963947
                bf2811d3-d8ad-4833-804e-e1e84af652cf
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,889

                Cited by59

                Most referenced authors655