51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correlates of Insulin Injection Omission

      research-article
      , PHD 1 , 2 , , PHD, CDE 2 , 3 , , MSN, APN-BC, BC-ADM 4 , , MD, FAAP 5
      Diabetes Care
      American Diabetes Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          The purpose of this study was to assess factors associated with patient frequency of intentionally skipping insulin injections.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          Data were obtained through an Internet survey of 502 U.S. adults self-identified as taking insulin by injection to treat type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Multiple regression analysis assessed independent associations of various demographic, disease, and injection-specific factors with insulin omission.

          RESULTS

          Intentional insulin omission was reported by more than half of respondents; regular omission was reported by 20%. Significant independent risk factors for insulin omission were younger age, lower income and higher education, type 2 diabetes, not following a healthy diet, taking more daily injections, interference of injections with daily activities, and injection pain and embarrassment. Risk factors differed between type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, with diet nonadherence more prominent in type 1 diabetes and age, education, income, pain, and embarrassment more prominent in type 2 diabetes.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Whereas most patients did not report regular intentional omission of insulin injections, a substantial number did. Our findings suggest that it is important to identify patients who intentionally omit insulin and be aware of the potential risk factors identified here. For patients who report injection-related problems (interference with daily activities, injection pain, and embarrassment), providers should consider recommending strategies and tools for addressing these problems to increase adherence to prescribed insulin regimens. This could improve clinical outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care.

          We assessed whether diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and use of preventive services were associated with depressive illness. In a large health maintenance organization, 4,463 patients with diabetes completed a questionnaire assessing self-care, diabetes monitoring, and depression. Automated diagnostic, laboratory, and pharmacy data were used to assess glycemic control, medication adherence, and preventive services. This predominantly type 2 diabetic population had a mean HbA(1c) level of 7.8 +/- 1.6%. Three-quarters of the patients received hypoglycemic agents (oral or insulin) and reported at least weekly self-monitoring of glucose and foot checks. The mean number of HbA(1c) tests was 2.2 +/- 1.3 per year and was only slightly higher among patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Almost one-half (48.9%) had a BMI >30 kg/m(2), and 47.8% of patients exercised once a week or less. Pharmacy refill data showed a 19.5% nonadherence rate to oral hypoglycemic medicines (mean 67.4 +/- 74.1 days) in the prior year. Major depression was associated with less physical activity, unhealthy diet, and lower adherence to oral hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering medications. In contrast, preventive care of diabetes, including home-glucose tests, foot checks, screening for microalbuminuria, and retinopathy was similar among depressed and nondepressed patients. In a primary care population, diabetes self-care was suboptimal across a continuum from home-based activities, such as healthy eating, exercise, and medication adherence, to use of preventive care. Major depression was mainly associated with patient-initiated behaviors that are difficult to maintain (e.g., exercise, diet, medication adherence) but not with preventive services for diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adherence to pharmacologic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

            Many patients who have type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) require several different medications. Although these agents can substantially reduce diabetes-related morbidity and mortality, the extent of treatment benefits may be limited by a lack of treatment adherence. Unfortunately, little information is available on treatment adherence in patients with type 2 DM. Available data indicate substantial opportunity for improving clinical outcomes through improved treatment adherence. Factors that appear to influence adherence include the patient's comprehension of the treatment regimen and its benefits, adverse effects, medication costs, and regimen complexity, as well as the patient's emotional well-being. Outcomes research emphasizes the importance of effective patient-provider communication in overcoming some of the barriers to adherence. This article offers specific suggestions for improving adherence in patients with type 2 DM seen in general clinical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of dosage frequency on patient compliance.

              To evaluate the impact of dosage frequency on the compliance of patients who receive their medicines from community pharmacies. Each month, patients received a supply of their medication in a Medication Event Monitoring Systems container, which registered each opening of the package. At the end of the study, the patients received a short questionnaire. The subjects were 91 diabetic patients using oral antidiabetic agents. Patients taking insulin and those who were unable to collect their medicines from the pharmacy were excluded from the study. Compliance was defined as the percentage of doses taken during the observation period. Another parameter used was compliance with the prescribed regimen, defined as the percentage of days in which the number of tablets were taken as prescribed. As a last parameter, compliance with the prescribed dose intervals was used. Compliance is influenced by the frequency of doses. The compliance for this group of patients is 74.8%, with an average of 79% in the case of a dose once daily and 38% in the case of a dose three times daily. The predominant type of noncompliance in all groups was dose omissions. However, more than one-third of the patients used more doses than prescribed. Overconsumption is a frequently made mistake by patients on a one-dose daily schedule. The reduction of dose frequency may decrease total noncompliance, but at the same time, it increases the risk of overconsumption. Reducing the frequency does not automatically result in a better therapeutic schedule. The choice of once or twice daily should depend on the therapeutic range of the drug.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Care
                diacare
                dcare
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                American Diabetes Association
                0149-5992
                1935-5548
                February 2010
                : 33
                : 2
                : 240-245
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Sociology, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland;
                [2] 2Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;
                [3] 3Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;
                [4] 4Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Bone and Mineral Disorders, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, Michigan;
                [5] 5Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Mark Peyrot, mpeyrot@ 123456loyola.edu .
                Article
                1348
                10.2337/dc09-1348
                2809256
                20103556
                bf33c300-cf70-41ec-a246-e265279d6a1b
                © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association.

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

                History
                : 22 July 2009
                : 19 October 2009
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article