5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cortical Neuroprosthesis Merges Visible and Invisible Light Without Impairing Native Sensory Function

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adult rats equipped with a sensory prosthesis, which transduced infrared (IR) signals into electrical signals delivered to somatosensory cortex (S1), took approximately 4 d to learn a four-choice IR discrimination task. Here, we show that when such IR signals are projected to the primary visual cortex (V1), rats that are pretrained in a visual-discrimination task typically learn the same IR discrimination task on their first day of training. However, without prior training on a visual discrimination task, the learning rates for S1- and V1-implanted animals converged, suggesting there is no intrinsic difference in learning rate between the two areas. We also discovered that animals were able to integrate IR information into the ongoing visual processing stream in V1, performing a visual-IR integration task in which they had to combine IR and visual information. Furthermore, when the IR prosthesis was implanted in S1, rats showed no impairment in their ability to use their whiskers to perform a tactile discrimination task. Instead, in some rats, this ability was actually enhanced. Cumulatively, these findings suggest that cortical sensory neuroprostheses can rapidly augment the representational scope of primary sensory areas, integrating novel sources of information into ongoing processing while incurring minimal loss of native function.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

          <i>Statistical Power Analysis</i> is a nontechnical guide to power analysis in research planning that provides users of applied statistics with the tools they need for more effective analysis. The Second Edition includes: <br> * a chapter covering power analysis in set correlation and multivariate methods;<br> * a chapter considering effect size, psychometric reliability, and the efficacy of "qualifying" dependent variables and;<br> * expanded power and sample size tables for multiple regression/correlation.<br>
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The neocortical circuit: themes and variations.

            Similarities in neocortical circuit organization across areas and species suggest a common strategy to process diverse types of information, including sensation from diverse modalities, motor control and higher cognitive processes. Cortical neurons belong to a small number of main classes. The properties of these classes, including their local and long-range connectivity, developmental history, gene expression, intrinsic physiology and in vivo activity patterns, are remarkably similar across areas. Each class contains subclasses; for a rapidly growing number of these, conserved patterns of input and output connections are also becoming evident. The ensemble of circuit connections constitutes a basic circuit pattern that appears to be repeated across neocortical areas, with area- and species-specific modifications. Such 'serially homologous' organization may adapt individual neocortical regions to the type of information each must process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is neocortex essentially multisensory?

              Although sensory perception and neurobiology are traditionally investigated one modality at a time, real world behaviour and perception are driven by the integration of information from multiple sensory sources. Mounting evidence suggests that the neural underpinnings of multisensory integration extend into early sensory processing. This article examines the notion that neocortical operations are essentially multisensory. We first review what is known about multisensory processing in higher-order association cortices and then discuss recent anatomical and physiological findings in presumptive unimodal sensory areas. The pervasiveness of multisensory influences on all levels of cortical processing compels us to reconsider thinking about neural processing in unisensory terms. Indeed, the multisensory nature of most, possibly all, of the neocortex forces us to abandon the notion that the senses ever operate independently during real-world cognition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                07 December 2017
                20 December 2017
                Nov-Dec 2017
                : 4
                : 6
                : ENEURO.0262-17.2017
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurobiology, Duke University , Durham, NC 27710
                [2 ]Biomedical Engineering, Duke University , Durham, NC 27710
                [3 ]Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University , Durham, NC 27710
                [4 ]Duke Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University , Durham, NC 27710
                [5 ]Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience of Natal , Natal, 59066-060, Brazil
                [6 ]Department of Biology, École Normale Supérieure De Lyon , Lyon, 69342, France
                [7 ]School of Medicine, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA 92093
                [8 ]Florida International University , Miami, FL 33199
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: E.E.T., I.Z., and M.A.N. designed research; E.E.T., I.Z., W.W., Y.T., C.W., J.P., W.F., and A.G. performed research; E.E.T. and I.Z. analyzed data; E.E.T., I.Z., and M.A.N. wrote the paper.

                Research reported in this publication was supported by the NINDS of NIH under Award Number R01DE011451 to MALN.

                E. Thomson and I. Zea are co-authors.

                Correspondence should be addressed to Miguel A.L. Nicolelis, MD, PhD, Box 103905, Dept. of Neurobiology, Duke University, 210 Research Drive, GSRBII Room 4028, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: nicoleli@ 123456neuro.duke.edu .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4097-3926
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-5821
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-0393
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-630X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-9562
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5502-9324
                Article
                eN-NWR-0262-17
                10.1523/ENEURO.0262-17.2017
                5739531
                bf6de585-d888-47c9-b0de-7b9448276c2a
                Copyright © 2017 Thomson et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 17 July 2017
                : 20 November 2017
                : 20 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Equations: 4, References: 52, Pages: 17, Words: 12720
                Funding
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000065HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
                Award ID: R01DE011451
                Categories
                8
                8.1
                New Research
                Sensory and Motor Systems
                Custom metadata
                November/December 2017

                behavior,multisensory integration,neuroprosthesis,plasticity

                Comments

                Comment on this article