2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Force overestimation during tourniquet-induced transient occlusion of the brachial artery and possible underlying neural mechanisms.

      1 , ,
      Neuroscience research
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A vascular occlusion by a tourniquet inflated at the proximal end of the upper arm is suggested to affect the estimation of exertion force level. In the first part of this study, subjects were asked to estimate the isometric force exerted by the occluded hand with that of the other hand (matching experiment). We found that the perceived force with arterial occlusion was always overestimated. To examine the underlying neural mechanism for this phenomenon, in the second part, the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and nerve action potential (NAP) were recorded following electrical median nerve stimulation with or without arterial occlusion. Moreover, the maximum motor response (M response) to median nerve stimuli at the axilla was recorded from the skin surface of the thenar eminence muscle of the hand during with arterial occlusion. The N20 of SEP and NAP at Erb's point were unaffected by the arterial occlusion, and the M response was also unchanged. These results suggest that the tourniquet-induced transient occlusion of the brachial artery does not seriously affect median nerve function. Thus, it is likely that the primary responsible factor for the overestimation of perceived force exertion during arterial occlusion is the centrally generated motor command as previously hypothesized by McCloskey [McCloskey, D.I., Ebeling, P., Goodwin, G.M., 1974. Estimation of weights and tensions and apparent involvement of a "sense of effort". Exp Neurol. 42, 220-232; McCloskey, D.I., 1978. Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol. Rev. 58, 763-820; McCloskey, D.I., 1981. Corollary discharge and motor commands and perception. In: Brookhart, J.M., Mountcastle, V.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Physiology. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp. 1415-1447].

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neurosci. Res.
          Neuroscience research
          Elsevier BV
          0168-0102
          0168-0102
          Jan 2006
          : 54
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama 359-1192, Japan.
          Article
          S0168-0102(05)00271-3
          10.1016/j.neures.2005.10.004
          16290301
          bf7cc36a-2707-4dd7-887d-29183c5a490f
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article