18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Double Standard at Sexual Debut: Gender, Sexual Behavior and Adolescent Peer Acceptance

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">A sexual double standard in adolescence has important implications for sexual development and gender inequality. The present study uses longitudinal social network data ( <i>N</i> = 914; 11–16 years of age) to test if gender moderates associations between adolescents’ sexual behaviors and peer acceptance. Consistent with a traditional sexual double standard, female adolescents who reported having sex had significant decreases in peer acceptance over time, whereas male adolescents reporting the same behavior had significant increases in peer acceptance. This pattern was observed net of respondents’ own perceived friendships, further suggesting that the social responses to sex vary by gender of the sexual actor. However, findings for “making out” showed a reverse double standard, such that female adolescents reporting this behavior had increases in peer acceptance and male adolescents reporting the same behavior had decreases in peer acceptance over time. Results thus suggest that peers enforce traditional sexual scripts for both “heavy” and “light” sexual behaviors during adolescence. These findings have important implications for sexual health education, encouraging educators to develop curricula that emphasize the gendered social construction of sexuality and to combat inequitable and stigmatizing peer responses to real or perceived deviations from traditional sexual scripts. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          USING THE CORRECT STATISTICAL TEST FOR THE EQUALITY OF REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research.

              A review of 30 studies published since 1980 found evidence for the continued existence of sexual double standards: different standards of sexual permissiveness for women and men. Experimental studies have included predominantly White North American college students; ethnographies, focus group and interview studies, and linguistic analyses have included more diverse samples. Studies show that sexual double standards are influenced by situational and interpersonal factors (e.g., the target's age, level of relationship commitment, and number of partners), and that double standards are local constructions, differing across ethnic and cultural groups. This review discusses methodological issues, including the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative approaches. It also discusses implications for women s high-risk sexual behavior and sexual identity, and suggests directions for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sex Roles
                Sex Roles
                Springer Nature
                0360-0025
                1573-2762
                October 2016
                April 6 2016
                : 75
                : 7-8
                : 377-392
                Article
                10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x
                5098900
                27833252
                bf81713e-1d60-461a-be54-d9c24fea1220
                © 2016

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,843

                Cited by35

                Most referenced authors438