12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay for Quantifying Fentanyl and 22 Analogs and Metabolites in Whole Blood, Urine, and Hair

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recently, synthetic opioid-related overdose fatalities, led by illicitly manufactured fentanyl and analogs, increased at an alarming rate, posing a global public health threat. New synthetic fentanyl analogs have been constantly emerging onto the drug marked for the last few years, to circumvent the laws and avoid analytical detection. Analytical methods need to be regularly updated to keep up with the new trends. In this study, we aimed to develop a new method for detecting the newest fentanyl analogs with a high sensitivity, in whole blood, urine, and hair. The method is intended to provide to clinical and forensic toxicologists a tool for documenting consumption. We developed a comprehensive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying fentanyl and 22 analogs and metabolites. Urine samples were simply diluted before injection; a liquid-liquid extraction was performed for blood testing; and a solid phase extraction was performed in hair. The chromatographic separation was short (8 min). The method was validated with a high sensitivity; limits of quantifications ranged from 2 to 6 ng/L in blood and urine, and from 11 to 21 pg/g in hair. The suitability of the method was tested with 42 postmortem blood, urine, or hair specimens from 27 fatalities in which fentanyl analogs were involved. Average blood concentrations (±SD) were 7.84 ± 7.21 and 30.0 ± 18.0 μg/L for cyclopropylfentanyl and cyclopropyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 8), 4.08 ± 2.30 μg/L for methoxyacetylfentanyl, ( n = 4), 40.2 ± 38.6 and 44.5 ± 21.1 μg/L for acetylfentanyl and acetyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 3), 33.7 and 7.17 μg/L for fentanyl and norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 1), 3.60 and 0.90 μg/L for furanylfentanyl and furanyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 1), 0.67 μg/L for sufentanil ( n = 1), and 3.13 ± 2.37 μg/L for 4-ANPP ( n = 9). Average urine concentrations were 47.7 ± 39.3 and 417 ± 296 μg/L for cyclopropylfentanyl and cyclopropyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 11), 995 ± 908 μg/L for methoxyacetylfentanyl, ( n = 3), 1,874 ± 1,710 and 6,582 ± 3,252 μg/L for acetylfentanyl and acetyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 5), 146 ± 318 and 300 ± 710 μg/L for fentanyl ( n = 5) and norfentanyl ( n = 6), respectively, 84.0 and 23.0 μg/L for furanylfentanyl and furanyl norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 1), and 50.5 ± 50.9 μg/L for 4-ANPP ( n = 10). Average hair concentrations were 2,670 ± 184 and 82.1 ± 94.7 ng/g for fentanyl and norfentanyl, respectively ( n = 2), and 10.8 ± 0.57 ng/g for 4-ANPP ( n = 2).

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS.

          In recent years, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) detection has been demonstrated to be a powerful technique for the quantitative determination of drugs and metabolites in biological fluids. However, the common and early perception that utilization of HPLC-MS/MS practically guarantees selectivity is being challenged by a number of reported examples of lack of selectivity due to ion suppression or enhancement caused by the sample matrix and interferences from metabolites. In light of these serious method liabilities, questions about how to develop and validate reliable HPLC-MS/MS methods, especially for supporting long-term human pharmacokinetic studies, are being raised. The central issue is what experiments, in addition to the validation data usually provided for the conventional bioanalytical methods, need to be conducted to confirm HPLC-MS/MS assay selectivity and reliability. The current regulatory requirements include the need for the assessment and elimination of the matrix effect in the bioanalytical methods, but the experimental procedures necessary to assess the matrix effect are not detailed. Practical, experimental approaches for studying, identifying, and eliminating the effect of matrix on the results of quantitative analyses by HPLC-MS/MS are described in this paper. Using as an example a set of validation experiments performed for one of our investigational new drug candidates, the concepts of the quantitative assessment of the "absolute" versus "relative" matrix effect are introduced. In addition, experiments for the determination of, the "true" recovery of analytes using HPLC-MS/MS are described eliminating the uncertainty about the effect of matrix on the determination of this commonly measured method parameter. Determination of the matrix effect allows the assessment of the reliability and selectivity of an existing HPLC-MS/MS method. If the results of these studies are not satisfactory, the parameters determined may provide a guide to what changes in the method need to be made to improve assay selectivity. In addition, a direct comparison of the extent of the matrix effect using two different interfaces (a heated nebulizer, HN, and ion spray, ISP) under otherwise the same sample preparation and chromatographic conditions was made. It was demonstrated that, for the investigational drug under study, the matrix effect was clearly observed when ISP interface was utilized but it was absent when the HN interface was employed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Deaths Involving Fentanyl, Fentanyl Analogs, and U-47700 — 10 States, July–December 2016

            Preliminary estimates of U.S. drug overdose deaths exceeded 60,000 in 2016 and were partially driven by a fivefold increase in overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids (excluding methadone), from 3,105 in 2013 to approximately 20,000 in 2016 ( 1 , 2 ). Illicitly manufactured fentanyl, a synthetic opioid 50–100 times more potent than morphine, is primarily responsible for this rapid increase ( 3 , 4 ). In addition, fentanyl analogs such as acetylfentanyl, furanylfentanyl, and carfentanil are being detected increasingly in overdose deaths ( 5 , 6 ) and the illicit opioid drug supply ( 7 ). Carfentanil is estimated to be 10,000 times more potent than morphine ( 8 ). Estimates of the potency of acetylfentanyl and furanylfentanyl vary but suggest that they are less potent than fentanyl ( 9 ). Estimates of relative potency have some uncertainty because illicit fentanyl analog potency has not been evaluated in humans. This report describes opioid overdose deaths during July–December 2016 that tested positive for fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, or U-47700, an illicit synthetic opioid, in 10 states participating in CDC’s Enhanced State Opioid Overdose Surveillance (ESOOS) program.* Fentanyl analogs are similar in chemical structure to fentanyl but not routinely detected because specialized toxicology testing is required. Fentanyl was detected in at least half of opioid overdose deaths in seven of 10 states, and 57% of fentanyl-involved deaths also tested positive for other illicit drugs, such as heroin. Fentanyl analogs were present in >10% of opioid overdose deaths in four states, with carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl identified most frequently. Expanded surveillance for opioid overdoses, including testing for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, assists in tracking the rapidly changing illicit opioid market and informing innovative interventions designed to reduce opioid overdose deaths. The 10 states † reporting data abstracted information from preliminary death certificates and medical examiner/coroner reports on unintentional and undetermined opioid overdose deaths using standard definitions for variables. Data were entered into the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS), the component of ESOOS designed for tracking fatal opioid overdoses. § For each death, available data on demographic characteristics, circumstances of the overdose collected from death scene investigations (e.g., evidence of illicit drug use), and results of forensic toxicology testing were entered into SUDORS. Opioid overdose deaths occurring during July–December 2016 with positive test results for fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, and U-47700 in 10 states are described, and key demographic and overdose circumstance factors are stratified by substance. Full toxicology findings of decedents were reviewed, including the presence of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine. Because heroin involvement in overdose deaths is difficult to distinguish from prescription morphine, deaths in which heroin was confirmed by toxicologic findings were combined with deaths in which heroin was suspected because morphine was detected and death scene evidence suggested heroin use. ¶ The use of medical examiner/coroner reports, previously unavailable across states, provides unique insights into specific substances and circumstances associated with overdoses, which can inform interventions. Fentanyl was detected in 56.3% of 5,152 opioid overdose deaths in the 10 states during July–December 2016 (Figure). Among these 2,903 fentanyl-positive deaths, fentanyl was determined to be a cause of death by the medical examiner or coroner in nearly all (97.1%) of the deaths. Northeastern states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island) and Missouri** reported the highest percentages of opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl (approximately 60%–90%), followed by Midwestern and Southern states (Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin), where approximately 30%–55% of decedents tested positive for fentanyl. New Mexico and Oklahoma reported the lowest percentage of fentanyl-involved deaths (approximately 15%–25%). In contrast, states detecting any fentanyl analogs in >10% of opioid overdose deaths were spread across the Northeast (Maine, 28.6%, New Hampshire, 12.2%), Midwest (Ohio, 26.0%), and South (West Virginia, 20.1%) (Figure) (Table 1). FIGURE Percentage of opioid overdose deaths testing positive for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, by state — 10 states, July–December 2016 The figure above is a bar chart showing the percentage of opioid overdose deaths testing positive for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs in 10 states, during July–December 2016. TABLE 1 Number and percentage of opioid overdose decedents testing positive for fentanyl analogs and U-47700 — 10 states, July–December 2016 State Total opioid overdose deaths Any fentanyl analog present* No. (%) Fentanyl analogs U-47700 synthetic opioid No. (%) Carfentanil No. (%) Furanylfentanyl No. (%) Acetylfentanyl No. (%) Other† No. (%) Total§ 5,152 720 (14.0) 389 (7.6) 182 (3.5) 147 (2.9) 74 (1.4) 40 (0.8) Maine 154 44 (28.6) 0 25 (16.2) 17 (11.0) 5 (3.3) — Massachusetts 1,071 17 (1.6) 0 10 (0.9) —¶ — — New Hampshire 131 16 (12.2) 0 — 13 (9.9) 0 — New Mexico 166 11 (6.6) 0 — 7 (4.2) 0 — Ohio 2,043 531 (26.0) 354 (17.3) 85 (4.2) 91 (4.5) 40 (2.0) 15 (0.7) West Virginia 393 79 (20.1) 35 (8.9) 44 (11.2) 6 (1.5) 23 (5.9) 7 (1.8) Wisconsin 413 14 (3.4) 0 6 (1.5) 5 (1.2) — 5 (1.2) Other three states** 781 8 (1.0) 0 — — — — * Individual fentanyl analog deaths might sum to a number greater than the number of deaths with any fentanyl analog present because more than one fentanyl analog could be present in an opioid overdose death. † Includes 3-methylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, butyrylfentanyl, para-fluorofentanyl (or 4-fluorofentanyl), para-fluorobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl), and para-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl). § Data from 10 states included in the total numbers; individual states presented if five or more deaths tested positive for any fentanyl analog. ¶ Five or more deaths tested positive for acetylfentanyl in Massachusetts, but the number was suppressed to prevent calculation of number for other states, which was less than five. ** Missouri (22 counties), Oklahoma, and Rhode Island. Fentanyl analogs were present in 720 (14.0%) opioid overdose deaths, with the most common being carfentanil (389 deaths, 7.6%), furanylfentanyl (182, 3.5%), and acetylfentanyl (147, 2.9%) (Table 1). Fentanyl analogs contributed to death in 535 of the 573 (93.4%) decedents. Cause of death was not available for fentanyl analogs in 147 deaths. †† Five or more deaths involving carfentanil occurred in two states (Ohio and West Virginia), furanylfentanyl in five states (Maine, Massachusetts, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin), and acetylfentanyl in seven states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin). U-47700 was present in 0.8% of deaths and found in five or more deaths only in Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin (Table 1). Demographic characteristics of decedents were similar among overdose deaths involving fentanyl analogs and fentanyl (Table 2). Most were male (71.7% fentanyl and 72.2% fentanyl analogs), non-Hispanic white (81.3% fentanyl and 83.6% fentanyl analogs), and aged 25–44 years (58.4% fentanyl and 60.0% fentanyl analogs) (Table 2). TABLE 2 Demographic characteristics and overdose circumstance factors for decedents in opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, and U-47700, by substance — 10 states, July–December 2016 Characteristic Fentanyl (N = 2,903) Any fentanyl analog* (N = 720) Fentanyl analogs U-47700 synthetic opioid (N = 40) Carfentanil (N = 389) Furanylfentanyl (N = 182) Acetylfentanyl (N = 147) Other†(N = 74) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) Age group (yrs) § 15–24 276 (9.5) 63 (8.8) 31 (8.0) —¶ 15 (10.2) — — 25–34 926 (31.9) 220 (30.6) 124 (31.9) 50 (27.5) 46 (31.3) 27 (36.5) 19 (47.5) 35–44 768 (26.5) 212 (29.4) 103 (26.5) 61 (33.5) 48 (32.7) 22 (29.7) 6 (15.0) 45–54 540 (18.6) 133 (18.5) 73 (18.8) 32 (17.6) 26 (17.7) 9 (12.2) 6 (15.0) 55–64 343 (11.8) 77 (10.7) 50 (12.9) 18 (9.9) — 8 (10.8) — ≥65 47 (1.6) 15 (2.1) 8 (2.1) — — — 0 Median age (IQR) in yrs 37 (29–48) 38 (30–48) 39 (30–49) 38 (31–47) 36 (30–45) 36 (29–46) 32 (27–43) Sex Male 2,080 (71.7) 520 (72.2) 276 (71.0) 134 (73.6) 111 (75.5) 49 (66.2) 32 (80.0) Female 820 (28.2) 200 (27.8) 113 (29.0) 48 (26.4) 36 (24.5) 25 (33.8) 8 (20.0) Race and Hispanic origin White, non-Hispanic 2,360 (81.3) 602 (83.6) 340 (87.4) 148 (81.3) 120 (81.6) 62 (83.8) 36 (90.0) Black, non-Hispanic 274 (9.4) 75 (10.4) 42 (10.8) 17 (9.3) 9 (6.1) 9 (12.2) — Other, non-Hispanic 37 (1.3) 9 (1.3) — — — — — Hispanic 189 (6.5) 20 (2.8) — — — — 0 Other fentanyl(s) present Fentanyl or other fentanyl analog n/a 330 (45.8) 120 (30.9) 93 (51.1) 143 (97.3) 46 (62.2) 24 (60.0) Fentanyl n/a 299 (41.5) 105 (27.0) 62 (34.1) 139 (94.6) 31 (41.9) 16 (40.0) 1 fentanyl analog present** 263 (9.1) 653 (90.7) 352 (90.5) 129 (70.9) 129 (87.8) 43 (58.1) 12 (30.0) ≥2 fentanyl analogs present 36 (1.2) 67 (9.3) 37 (9.5) 53 (29.1) 18 (12.2) 31 (41.9) 6 (15.0) 4-ANPP †† 60 (2.1) 82 (11.4) — 77 (42.3) — 13 (17.6) 8 (20.0) Other illicit drugs present Any illicit drugs 1,656 (57.0) 369 (51.3) 190 (48.8) 91 (50.0) 91 (61.9) 42 (56.8) 15 (37.5) Suspected/Confirmed heroin§§ 1,132 (39.0) 250 (34.7) 123 (31.6) 60 (33.0) 75 (51.0) 26 (35.1) 11 (27.5) Cocaine 1,011 (34.8) 202 (28.1) 99 (25.4) 52 (28.6) 43 (29.3) 26 (35.1) 7 (17.5) Methamphetamine 167 (5.8) 64 (8.9) 43 (11.1) 12 (6.6) 10 (6.8) — — Evidence of injection 1,358 (46.8) 303 (42.1) 151 (38.8) 76 (41.8) 81 (55.1) 35 (47.3) 19 (47.5) No evidence of injection but evidence of other route ¶¶ 532 (18.3) 138 (19.2) 85 (21.9) 33 (18.1) 19 (12.9) 10 (13.5) 11 (27.5) Evidence of snorting 279 (52.4) 95 (68.8) 57 (67.1) 21 (63.6) 15 (78.9) 9 (90.0) 8 (72.7) Evidence of ingestion 203 (38.2) 41 (29.7) 27 (31.8) 8 (24.2) 7 (36.8) — — Evidence of smoking 95 (17.9) 25 (18.1) 16 (18.8) 7 (21.2) — — — Evidence of transdermal 35 (6.6) — — 0 — 0 0 Evidence of sublingual 6 (1.1) — — 0 0 0 0 No evidence of route 1,013 (34.9) 279 (38.8) 153 (39.3) 73 (40.1) 47 (32.0) 29 (39.2) 10 (25.0) Abbreviation: n/a = not applicable. * Individual fentanyl analog deaths might sum to a number greater than the number of deaths with any fentanyl analog present because more than one fentanyl analog could be present in an opioid overdose death. † Includes 3-methylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, butyrylfentanyl, para-fluorofentanyl (or 4-fluorofentanyl), para-fluorobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl), and para-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl (or 4-fluoroisobutyrylfentanyl). § Fewer than five persons aged ≤14 years died of an overdose that tested positive for a fentanyl analog. ¶ Data suppressed because fewer than five deaths, or suppressed to prohibit calculation of other suppressed cell. ** For fentanyl analogs, indicates no other analog present. †† Despropionylfentanyl is a fentanyl compound that can serve as a marker for illicitly manufactured fentanyl and fentanyl analogs because it is both a precursor and a metabolite of these illicit products (but not pharmaceutical fentanyl), while having low metabolic activity that does not contribute to overdose toxicity. Despropionylfentanyl is also known as 4-anilino-N-phenethylpiperidine, or 4-ANPP. §§ Includes decedents testing positive for heroin metabolite 6-acetylmorphine, plus decedents testing positive for morphine where there was a history of heroin use, death scene evidence of illicit drug use, or evidence of injection, and no scene evidence of prescription drug use or other evidence of prescription morphine. ¶¶ Percentage of deaths with evidence of routes of administration other than injection calculated out of the number of deaths in this row. Other illicit drugs co-occurred in 57.0% and 51.3% of deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, respectively, with cocaine and confirmed or suspected heroin detected in a substantial percentage of deaths (Table 2). Nearly half (45.8%) of deaths involving fentanyl analogs tested positive for two or more analogs or fentanyl, or both. Specifically, 30.9%, 51.1%, and 97.3% of deaths involving carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl, respectively, tested positive for fentanyl or additional fentanyl analogs. Forensic investigations found evidence of injection drug use in 46.8% and 42.1% of overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, respectively. Approximately one in five deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs had no evidence of injection drug use but did have evidence of other routes of administration. Among these deaths, snorting (52.4% fentanyl and 68.8% fentanyl analogs) and ingestion (38.2% fentanyl and 29.7% fentanyl analogs) were most common. Although rare, transdermal administration was found among deaths involving fentanyl (1.2%), likely indicating pharmaceutical fentanyl (Table 2). More than one third of deaths had no evidence of route of administration. Discussion This analysis of opioid overdose deaths in 10 states participating in the ESOOS program found that illicitly manufactured fentanyl is a key factor driving opioid overdose deaths and that fentanyl analogs are increasingly contributing to a complex illicit opioid market with significant public health implications. Previous reports have indicated that use of illicitly manufactured fentanyl mixed with heroin, with and without users’ knowledge, is driving many fentanyl overdoses, particularly east of the Mississippi River ( 3 , 4 ). Consistent with these findings, at least half of opioid overdose deaths in six of the seven participating states east of the Mississippi tested positive for fentanyl. Over half the overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs tested positive for confirmed or suspected heroin (the most commonly detected illicit substance), cocaine, or methamphetamine. This supports findings from other reports indicating that fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are commonly used with or mixed with heroin or cocaine ( 3 , 4 ). Nearly half of overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, however, did not test positive for other illicit opioids, suggesting that fentanyl and fentanyl analogs might be emerging as unique illicit products. Fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are highly potent and fast-acting synthetic compounds that can trigger rapid progression to loss of consciousness and death and thus might require immediate treatment and high doses of naloxone ( 5 ). Because of the potency of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs and the rapid onset of action, these drugs were determined by medical examiners and coroners to play a causal role in almost all fatal opioid overdoses in which they were detected. Injection, the most commonly reported route of administration in fatal overdoses, exacerbates these risks because of rapid absorption and high bioavailability. The high potency of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, however, can result in overdose even when administered via other routes. Nearly one in five deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs had evidence of snorting, ingestion, or smoking, with no evidence of injection. Multiple overdose outbreaks and law enforcement drug product submissions across the country have reported counterfeit prescription pills laced with fentanyl and fentanyl analogs ( 10 ). With few exceptions, fentanyl analogs are illicitly manufactured, because they do not have a legitimate medical use in humans. §§ The detection of fentanyl analogs in >10% of opioid overdoses in four states raises the concern that fentanyl analogs have become a part of illicit opioid markets in multiple states. The fentanyl analogs most commonly detected were carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl. Carfentanil, which is intended for sedation of large animals, is much more potent than fentanyl, whereas furanylfentanyl and acetylfentanyl are less potent ( 9 ). Carfentanil contributed to approximately 350 overdose deaths in Ohio, but was detected in only one other state (West Virginia). Because of its extreme potency, even limited circulation of carfentanil could markedly increase the number of fatal overdoses. Recent data suggest that carfentanil deaths are occurring in multiple other states, including Kentucky, which reported 10 overdose deaths involving carfentanil in the second half of 2016 (Kentucky Department of Public Health, unpublished data, 2017) and New Hampshire, which reported 10 deaths in 2017. ¶¶ Forty-six percent of SUDORS opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl analogs tested positive for fentanyl or an additional fentanyl analog, ranging from 31% for carfentanil to 97% for acetylfentanyl. The increased mixing or co-use of fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and varying fentanyl analogs might contribute to increased risk for overdose because persons misusing opioids and other drugs are exposed to drug products with substantially varied potency. The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, results are limited to 10 states and therefore might not be generalizable. Second, the presence of fentanyl analogs is underestimated because commonly used toxicologic testing does not include fentanyl analogs, some fentanyl analogs are difficult to detect ( 9 ), and specialized testing for fentanyl analogs varied across states and over time. Third, the route of fentanyl and fentanyl analog administration must be interpreted cautiously because the data do not link specific drugs to routes of administration and thus the precise route of administration of fentanyl or fentanyl analogs cannot be determined in overdose deaths involving multiple substances (e.g., heroin and cocaine) and routes (e.g., injection and snorting). Fourth, the combination of deaths with toxicologic confirmation of heroin with those with detection of morphine and death scene evidence suggesting heroin use might have resulted in misclassification of some deaths. Finally, fentanyl source could not be definitively determined; however, only a small percentage of fentanyl deaths had evidence consistent with prescription fentanyl (e.g., transdermal use versus injection). Illicitly manufactured fentanyl is now a major driver of opioid overdose deaths in multiple states, with a variety of fentanyl analogs increasingly involved, if not solely implicated, in these deaths. This finding raises concern that in the near future, fentanyl analog overdose deaths might mirror the rapidly rising trajectory of fentanyl overdose deaths that began in 2013 and become a major factor in opioid overdose deaths. In response to this concern, CDC expanded ESOOS to 32 states and the District of Columbia in 2017 and added funding for all 33 recipients to improve forensic toxicologic testing of opioid overdose deaths to include capacity to test for a wider range of fentanyl analogs.*** Increased implementation of evidence-based efforts targeting persons at high risk for illicit opioid use, including increased access to medication-assisted treatment, increased availability of naloxone in sufficient doses, and other innovative intervention programs targeting this group, is needed to address a large and growing percentage of opioid overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs. Summary What is already known about this topic? Sharp increases in opioid overdose deaths since 2013 are partly explained by the introduction of illicitly manufactured fentanyl into the heroin market. Outbreaks related to fentanyl analogs also have occurred. One fentanyl analog, carfentanil, is estimated to be 10,000 times more potent than morphine. Fentanyl analogs are not routinely detected because specialized toxicology testing is required. What is added by this report? This is the first report using toxicologic and death scene evidence across multiple states to characterize opioid overdose deaths. Fentanyl was involved in >50% of opioid overdose deaths, and >50% of deaths testing positive for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs also tested positive for other illicit drugs. Approximately 700 deaths tested positive for fentanyl analogs, with the most common being carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and acetylfentanyl. What are the implications for public health practice? Increasing mixing or co-use of fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and fentanyl analogs might contribute to increased overdose risk, because users are exposed to drug products that vary substantially in potency and that include some extremely potent products. Surveillance for opioid overdoses needs to expand to track the rapidly changing illicit opioid market. In fall 2017, CDC funded 33 jurisdictions to expand forensic toxicology testing. Increased implementation of evidence-based efforts targeting persons at high risk for using illicit opioids, including increased access to medication-assisted treatment and increased availability of naloxone, and innovative interventions are needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Misuse of Novel Synthetic Opioids: A Deadly New Trend

              Novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) include various analogs of fentanyl and newly emerging non-fentanyl compounds. Together with illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF), these drugs have caused a recent spike in overdose deaths, whereas deaths from prescription opioids have stabilized. NSOs are used as stand-alone products, as adulterants in heroin, or as constituents of counterfeit prescription medications. During 2015 alone, there were 9580 deaths from synthetic opioids other than methadone. Most of these fatalities were associated with IMF rather than diverted pharmaceutical fentanyl. In opioid overdose cases, where the presence of fentanyl analogs was examined, analogs were implicated in 17% of fatalities. Recent data from law enforcement sources show increasing confiscation of acetylfentanyl, butyrylfentanyl, and furanylfentanyl, in addition to non-fentanyl compounds such as U-47700. Since 2013, deaths from NSOs in the United States were 52 for acetylfentanyl, 40 for butyrylfentanyl, 128 for furanylfentanyl, and 46 for U-47700. All of these substances induce a classic opioid toxidrome, which can be reversed with the competitive antagonist naloxone. However, due to the putative high potency of NSOs and their growing prevalence, it is recommended to forgo the 0.4 mg initial dose of naloxone and start with 2 mg. Because NSOs offer enormous profit potential, and there is strong demand for their use, these drugs are being trafficked by organized crime. NSOs present major challenges for medical professionals, law enforcement agencies, and policymakers. Resources must be distributed equitably to enhance harm reduction though public education, medication-assisted therapies, and improved access to naloxone.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Chem
                Front Chem
                Front. Chem.
                Frontiers in Chemistry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2646
                02 April 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 184
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Section of Legal Medicine, Università Politecnica Delle Marche , Ancona, Italy
                [2] 2Unit of Forensic Toxicology, Università la Sapienza , Rome, Italy
                [3] 3National Centre on Addiction and Doping, Istituto Superiore di Sanità , Rome, Italy
                [4] 4Comedical S.r.l. , Trento, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Simon P. Elliott, Independent Researcher, London, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Marta Concheiro-Guisan, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, United States; Wei-Lung Tseng, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan

                *Correspondence: Francesco Paolo Busardò fra.busardo@ 123456libero.it

                This article was submitted to Analytical Chemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry

                Article
                10.3389/fchem.2019.00184
                6454115
                31001514
                bf913adb-5c07-43be-a30b-0e315fc5b82e
                Copyright © 2019 Busardò, Carlier, Giorgetti, Tagliabracci, Pacifici, Gottardi and Pichini.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 January 2019
                : 11 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 13, Words: 9452
                Categories
                Chemistry
                Original Research

                fentanyl,fentanyl analogs,uhplc-ms/ms,blood,urine,hair
                fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, uhplc-ms/ms, blood, urine, hair

                Comments

                Comment on this article