10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds Are Able to Discriminate between Neutrophilic and Eosinophilic Asthma

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale: Analysis of exhaled breath for asthma phenotyping using endogenously generated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) offers the possibility of noninvasive diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. Induced sputum is indeed not widely available and markers of neutrophilic asthma are still lacking.Objectives: To determine whether analysis of exhaled breath using endogenously generated VOCs can be a surrogate marker for recognition of sputum inflammatory phenotypes.Methods: We conducted a prospective study on 521 patients with asthma recruited from the University Asthma Clinic of Liege. Patients underwent VOC measurement, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) spirometry, sputum induction, and gave a blood sample. Subjects with asthma were classified in three inflammatory phenotypes according to their sputum granulocytic cell count.Measurements and Main Results: In the discovery study, seven potential biomarkers were highlighted by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in a training cohort of 276 patients with asthma. In the replication study (n = 245), we confirmed four VOCs of interest to discriminate among asthma inflammatory phenotypes using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Hexane and 2-hexanone were identified as compounds with the highest classification performance in eosinophilic asthma with accuracy comparable to that of blood eosinophils and FeNO. Moreover, the combination of FeNO, blood eosinophils, and VOCs gave a very good prediction of eosinophilic asthma (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.9). For neutrophilic asthma, the combination of nonanal, 1-propanol, and hexane had a classification performance similar to FeNO or blood eosinophils in eosinophilic asthma. Those compounds were found in higher levels in neutrophilic asthma.Conclusions: Our study is the first attempt to characterize VOCs according to sputum granulocytic profile in a large population of patients with asthma and provide surrogate markers for neutrophilic asthma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Analysis of induced sputum in adults with asthma: identification of subgroup with isolated sputum neutrophilia and poor response to inhaled corticosteroids.

          The debate as to whether asthma is a single or heterogeneous disease remains unresolved although pathological studies, mostly using fibreoptic bronchoscopy on small numbers of subjects, have emphasised the similarities between different clinical phenotypes. Lower airway inflammation was assessed non-invasively using induced sputum in 34 normal controls and 259 adults with symptomatic asthma receiving treatment at steps 1-3 of the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines. A subgroup of 49 patients treated with as required beta(2) agonists only who met BTS criteria for a step up in treatment were studied before and 2 months after treatment with inhaled budesonide 400 micro g twice daily. There was considerable heterogeneity in induced sputum cell counts, particularly in non-atopic patients. A subgroup of 60 patients had a distinctive sputum cell profile with a neutrophil count higher than our normal range (>65.3%) and a normal sputum eosinophil count (<1.9%). These patients were older, predominantly female, and were more likely to be non-atopic but otherwise had similar clinical and physiological features to the group as a whole. Among the 49 subjects studied before and after inhaled budesonide, 11 patients had an isolated sputum neutrophilia. Following treatment, these patients showed significantly less improvement in visual analogue symptom scores (-5.5 v -19.4 mm; mean difference 13.9; 95% CI 0.7 to 27.0), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) (-0.08 v 0.13 l; mean difference 0.21; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.39), and concentration of methacholine provoking a fall in FEV(1) of 20% or more (PC(20)) (0.15 v 1.29 doubling doses; mean difference 1.11; 95% CI 0.13 to 2.15) than the remaining 38 patients. These results suggest the presence of a distinct subgroup of patients with mild to moderate asthma who have predominantly neutrophilic airway inflammation and who respond less well to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Azithromycin for prevention of exacerbations in severe asthma (AZISAST): a multicentre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

            Patients with severe asthma are at increased risk of exacerbations and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Severe asthma is heterogeneous, encompassing eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic (mainly neutrophilic) phenotypes. Patients with neutropilic airway diseases may benefit from macrolides. We performed a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial in subjects with exacerbation-prone severe asthma. Subjects received low-dose azithromycin (n=55) or placebo (n=54) as add-on treatment to combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists for 6 months. The primary outcome was the rate of severe exacerbations and LRTI requiring treatment with antibiotics during the 26-week treatment phase. Secondary efficacy outcomes included lung function and scores on the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). The rate of primary endpoints (PEPs) during 6 months was not significantly different between the two treatment groups: 0.75 PEPs (95% CI 0.55 to 1.01) per subject in the azithromycin group versus 0.81 PEPs (95% CI 0.61 to 1.09) in the placebo group (p=0.682). In a predefined subgroup analysis according to the inflammatory phenotype, azithromycin was associated with a significantly lower PEP rate than placebo in subjects with non-eosinophilic severe asthma (blood eosinophilia ≤200/µl): 0.44 PEPs (95% CI 0.25 to 0.78) versus 1.03 PEPs (95% CI 0.72 to 1.48) (p=0.013). Azithromycin significantly improved the AQLQ score but there were no significant between-group differences in the ACQ score or lung function. Azithromycin was well tolerated, but was associated with increased oropharyngeal carriage of macrolide-resistant streptococci. Azithromycin did not reduce the rate of severe exacerbations and LRTI in patients with severe asthma. However, the significant reduction in the PEP rate in azithromycin-treated patients with non-eosinophilic severe asthma warrants further study. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT00760838.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clarithromycin targets neutrophilic airway inflammation in refractory asthma.

              Patients with refractory asthma have persistent symptoms despite maximal treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators. The availability of add-on therapies is limited, and effective add-on therapies that target noneosinophilic airway inflammation are needed. Macrolide antibiotics, such as clarithromycin, have in vitro efficacy against IL-8 and neutrophils, key inflammatory mediators in noneosinophilic asthma. To determine the efficacy of clarithromycin in patients with severe refractory asthma and specifically in a subgroup of patients with noneosinophilic asthma. Subjects with severe refractory asthma (n = 45) were randomized to receive clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary outcome for this study was sputum IL-8 concentration. Other inflammatory outcomes assessed included sputum neutrophil numbers and concentrations of neutrophil elastase and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9. Clinical outcomes were also assessed, including lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness to hypertonic saline, asthma control, quality of life, and symptoms. Clarithromycin therapy significantly reduced airway concentrations of IL-8 and neutrophil numbers and improved quality-of-life scores compared with placebo. Reductions in neutrophil elastase and MMP-9 concentrations were also observed. These reductions in inflammation were most marked in those with refractory noneosinophilic asthma. Clarithromycin therapy can modulate IL-8 levels and neutrophil accumulation and activation in the airways of patients with refractory asthma. Macrolide therapy may be an important additional therapy that could be used to reduce noneosinophilic airway inflammation, particularly neutrophilic inflammation, in asthma. Clinical trial registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry www.actr.org.au (No. 12605000318684).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                American Thoracic Society
                1073-449X
                1535-4970
                August 15 2019
                August 15 2019
                : 200
                : 4
                : 444-453
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Respiratory Medicine, GIGA I3, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liege, Belgium
                [2 ]Organic and Biological Analytical Chemistry Group and
                [3 ]Medical Genomics-BIO3, GIGA-R, University of Liege, Sart-Tilman, Liege, Belgium
                [4 ]Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; and
                [5 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
                Article
                10.1164/rccm.201811-2210OC
                30973757
                bfa01333-913a-4ecb-ab0f-367dcabc993f
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article