17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers and Facilitators to Community Mobility for Assistive Technology Users

      research-article
      *
      Rehabilitation Research and Practice
      Hindawi Publishing Corporation

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mobility is frequently described in terms of individual body function and structures however contemporary views of disability also recognise the role of environment in creating disability. Aim. To identify consumer perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to optimal mobility for a heterogeneous population of impaired Victorians who use assistive technology in their daily lives. Method. An accessible survey investigated the impact of supports or facilitators upon actual and desired life outcomes and health-related quality of life, from 100 AT users in Victoria, Australia. This paper reports upon data pertaining to community mobility. Results. A range of barriers and enablers to community mobility were identified including access to AT devices, environmental interventions, public transport, and inclusive community environs. Substantial levels of unmet need result in limited personal mobility and community participation. Outcomes fall short of many principles enshrined in current policy and human rights frameworks. Conclusion. AT devices as well as accessible and inclusive home and community environs are essential to maximizing mobility for many. Given the impact of the environment upon the capacity of individuals to realise community mobility, this raises the question as to whether rehabilitation practitioners, as well as prescribing AT devices, should work to build accessible communities via systemic advocacy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Disability Rights and Wrongs

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            International classification of functioning, disability & health

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Population norms and meaningful differences for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measure.

              The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument is widely used in Australian health research. To assist researchers interpret and report their work, this paper reports population and health status norms, general minimal important differences (MIDs) and effect sizes. Data from the 1998 South Australian Health Omnibus Survey (n=3,010 population-based respondents) were analysed by gender, age group and health status. Data from four other longitudinal studies were analysed to obtain estimated MIDs. The mean (SD) AQoL utility score was 0.83 (0.20). Gender and age subgroup differences were apparent; the mean scores for women were consistent until their 50s, when scores declined. Greater variability was observed for males whose scores declined more slowly but consistently between 40-80 years. For both genders, those aged 80+ years had the lowest scores. When assessed by health status, those reporting excellent health obtained the highest utility scores; progressive declines were observed with decreasing health status. Effect sizes of 0.13 or greater may reflect important differences between groups. A difference in AQoL scores of 0.06 utility points over time suggests a general MID. AQoL population norms, MIDs and effect sizes can be used as reference points for the interpretation of AQoL data. These findings add to the growing evidence that the AQoL is a robust and sensitive measure that has wide applicability. The availability of population norms will assist researchers using the AQoL to more easily interpret and report their work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rehabil Res Pract
                Rehabil Res Pract
                RERP
                Rehabilitation Research and Practice
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-2867
                2090-2875
                2012
                13 September 2012
                : 2012
                : 454195
                Affiliations
                School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: K. S. Sunnerhagen

                Article
                10.1155/2012/454195
                3458275
                23029617
                bfdb369a-1ada-44cb-a53d-e4bd2f7b34d7
                Copyright © 2012 Natasha Layton.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 April 2012
                : 13 July 2012
                : 15 July 2012
                Categories
                Research Article

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article