16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing media and family predictors of alcohol use: a cohort study of US adolescents

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To compare media/marketing exposures and family factors in predicting adolescent alcohol use.

          Design

          Cohort study.

          Setting

          Confidential telephone survey of adolescents in their homes.

          Participants

          Representative sample of 6522 US adolescents, aged 10–14 years at baseline and surveyed four times over 2 years.

          Primary outcome measure

          Time to alcohol onset and progression to binge drinking were assessed with two survival models. Predictors were movie alcohol exposure (MAE), ownership of alcohol-branded merchandise and characteristics of the family (parental alcohol use, home availability of alcohol and parenting). Covariates included sociodemographics, peer drinking and personality factors.

          Results

          Over the study period, the prevalence of adolescent ever use and binge drinking increased from 11% to 25% and from 4% to 13%, respectively. At baseline, the median estimated MAE from a population of 532 movies was 4.5 h and 11% owned alcohol-branded merchandise at time 2. Parental alcohol use (greater than or equal to weekly) was reported by 23% and 29% of adolescents could obtain alcohol from home. Peer drinking, MAE, alcohol-branded merchandise, age and rebelliousness were associated with both alcohol onset and progression to binge drinking. The adjusted hazard ratios for alcohol onset and binge drinking transition for high versus low MAE exposure were 2.13 (95% CI 1.76 to 2.57) and 1.63 (1.20 to 2.21), respectively, and MAE accounted for 28% and 20% of these transitions, respectively. Characteristics of the family were associated with alcohol onset but not with progression.

          Conclusion

          The results suggest that family focused interventions would have a larger impact on alcohol onset while limiting media and marketing exposure could help prevent both onset and progression.

          Article summary

          Article focus
          • Predictors of drinking during adolescence.

          • Particular focus on predicting onset versus binge drinking and media/marketing exposures versus family risk factors.

          Key messages
          • Somewhat different risk factors exist for alcohol onset versus binge drinking.

          • Movie alcohol, alcohol marketing, friend drinking and sensation seeking predicted both outcomes.

          • Parent drinking, availability of alcohol at home and parenting predicted alcohol onset, not binge drinking.

          Strengths and limitations
          • Strengths include longitudinal design, large sample size and analysis that accounted for attrition.

          • Limitations include inability to generalise beyond US adolescents or beyond this age bracket.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

          Statistical procedures for missing data have vastly improved, yet misconception and unsound practice still abound. The authors frame the missing-data problem, review methods, offer advice, and raise issues that remain unresolved. They clear up common misunderstandings regarding the missing at random (MAR) concept. They summarize the evidence against older procedures and, with few exceptions, discourage their use. They present, in both technical and practical language, 2 general approaches that come highly recommended: maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian multiple imputation (MI). Newer developments are discussed, including some for dealing with missing data that are not MAR. Although not yet in the mainstream, these procedures may eventually extend the ML and MI methods that currently represent the state of the art.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey.

            Data from 27,616 current and former drinkers interviewed in the 1992 National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey were used to examine the relationship between age at first use of alcohol and the prevalence of lifetime alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence, among all U.S. adults 18 years of age and over and within subgroups defined by sex and race. The rates of lifetime dependence declined from more than 40% among individuals who started drinking at ages 14 or younger to roughly 10% among those who started drinking at ages 20 and older. The rates of lifetime abuse declined from just over 11% among those who initiated use of alcohol at ages 16 or younger to approximately 4% among those whose onset of use was at ages 20 or older. After using multivariate logistic regression models to adjust for potential confounders, the odds of dependence decreased by 14% with each increasing year of age at onset of use, and the odds of abuse decreased by 8%. These findings are discussed with respect to their implications for prevention policies and the need to integrate epidemiological and intervention research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ten-year prospective study of public health problems associated with early drinking.

              To compare early nondrinkers, experimenters, and drinkers on the prevalence of problem behaviors at grades 7 and 12 and at age 23 (N = 6338, 4265, and 3369, respectively). Results are based on longitudinal self-report data from individuals who were originally recruited from 30 California and Oregon schools at grade 7 (1985) and assessed again at grade 12 (1990) and at age 23 (1995). Logistic regression was used to develop weighted estimates of the prevalence of academic difficulties, employment problems, substance use, and delinquent and violent behaviors within the 3 drinking status groups at grades 7, 12, and/or at age 23. Huber variance estimates, which adjust for weighting and clustering of observations, were used to assess the statistical significance of differences across groups. Early drinkers and experimenters were more likely than nondrinkers to report academic problems, substance use, and delinquent behavior in both middle school and high school. By young adulthood, early alcohol use was associated with employment problems, other substance abuse, and criminal and violent behavior. Early drinkers do not necessarily mature out of a problematic lifestyle as young adults. Interventions for these high-risk youth should start early and address their other public health problems, particularly their tendency to smoke and use other illicit drugs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2012
                20 February 2012
                20 February 2012
                : 2
                : 1
                : e000543
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
                [2 ]Prevention and Control Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
                [4 ]Cancer Control Research Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
                [5 ]Department of Psychology, St Catherine University, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
                [6 ]Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr James D Sargent; james.d.sargent@ 123456dartmouth.edu
                Article
                bmjopen-2011-000543
                10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000543
                3289988
                22349939
                bfee62d7-2ca8-48bb-92d9-a41d84b28889
                © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 18 November 2011
                : 15 December 2011
                Categories
                Paediatrics
                Research
                1506
                1612
                1719
                1681
                1692
                1703
                1724
                Custom metadata
                press-release

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article