18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Talin tension sensor reveals novel features of focal adhesion force transmission and mechanosensitivity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The cytoskeletal adapter protein talin plays a prominent role in adhesive structures connecting integrins to the actin cytoskeleton. In this work, Kumar et al. use a novel talin sensor to measure talin tension and provide insights into focal adhesion force transmission and mechanosensitivity.

          Abstract

          Integrin-dependent adhesions are mechanosensitive structures in which talin mediates a linkage to actin filaments either directly or indirectly by recruiting vinculin. Here, we report the development and validation of a talin tension sensor. We find that talin in focal adhesions is under tension, which is higher in peripheral than central adhesions. Tension on talin is increased by vinculin and depends mainly on actin-binding site 2 (ABS2) within the middle of the rod domain, rather than ABS3 at the far C terminus. Unlike vinculin, talin is under lower tension on soft substrates. The difference between central and peripheral adhesions requires ABS3 but not vinculin or ABS2. However, differential stiffness sensing by talin requires ABS2 but not vinculin or ABS3. These results indicate that central versus peripheral adhesions must be organized and regulated differently, and that ABS2 and ABS3 have distinct functions in spatial variations and stiffness sensing. Overall, these results shed new light on talin function and constrain models for cellular mechanosensing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors.

          Actin stress fibers are one of the major cytoskeletal structures in fibroblasts and are linked to the plasma membrane at focal adhesions. rho, a ras-related GTP-binding protein, rapidly stimulated stress fiber and focal adhesion formation when microinjected into serum-starved Swiss 3T3 cells. Readdition of serum produced a similar response, detectable within 2 min. This activity was due to a lysophospholipid, most likely lysophosphatidic acid, bound to serum albumin. Other growth factors including PDGF induced actin reorganization initially to form membrane ruffles, and later, after 5 to 10 min, stress fibers. For all growth factors tested the stimulation of focal adhesion and stress fiber assembly was inhibited when endogenous rho function was blocked, whereas membrane ruffling was unaffected. These data imply that rho is essential specifically for the coordinated assembly of focal adhesions and stress fibers induced by growth factors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells

            Stress fibers play a central role in adhesion, motility, and morphogenesis of eukaryotic cells, but the mechanism of how these and other contractile actomyosin structures are generated is not known. By analyzing stress fiber assembly pathways using live cell microscopy, we revealed that these structures are generated by two distinct mechanisms. Dorsal stress fibers, which are connected to the substrate via a focal adhesion at one end, are assembled through formin (mDia1/DRF1)–driven actin polymerization at focal adhesions. In contrast, transverse arcs, which are not directly anchored to substrate, are generated by endwise annealing of myosin bundles and Arp2/3-nucleated actin bundles at the lamella. Remarkably, dorsal stress fibers and transverse arcs can be converted to ventral stress fibers anchored to focal adhesions at both ends. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis revealed that actin filament cross-linking in stress fibers is highly dynamic, suggesting that the rapid association–dissociation kinetics of cross-linkers may be essential for the formation and contractility of stress fibers. Based on these data, we propose a general model for assembly and maintenance of contractile actin structures in cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Integration of actin dynamics and cell adhesion by a three-dimensional, mechanosensitive molecular clutch.

              During cell migration, the forces generated in the actin cytoskeleton are transmitted across transmembrane receptors to the extracellular matrix or other cells through a series of mechanosensitive, regulable protein-protein interactions termed the molecular clutch. In integrin-based focal adhesions, the proteins forming this linkage are organized into a conserved three-dimensional nano-architecture. Here we discuss how the physical interactions between the actin cytoskeleton and focal-adhesion-associated molecules mediate force transmission from the molecular clutch to the extracellular matrix.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                9 May 2016
                : 213
                : 3
                : 371-383
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Yale Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
                [2 ]Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow G20 0TZ, Scotland, UK
                [3 ]School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, England, UK
                [4 ]Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
                [5 ]Department of Cell Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Martin A. Schwartz: martin.schwartz@ 123456yale.edu
                Article
                201510012
                10.1083/jcb.201510012
                4862330
                27161398
                bffddfd7-5541-4521-a1c3-f8d36e7d0d77
                © 2016 Kumar et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                : 03 October 2015
                : 05 April 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: U.S. Public Health Service http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007197
                Award ID: PO1 GM98412
                Funded by: Cancer Research UK http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289
                Funded by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001691
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article