1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What Do We Know About Patient Safety Culture in Saudi Arabia? A Descriptive Study

      research-article
      , MBBS , , , PhD
      Journal of Patient Safety
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      safety culture; patient safety, trending, percentile

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patient safety is described as the prevention and mitigation of medical errors that can result in harm while a patient is receiving care. One important way to improve safety is through improving the patient safety culture in healthcare. The purposes of this study are to evaluate the patient safety culture trend in Saudi Arabia and assess the improvement over time.

          Methods

          This study is a descriptive study that used a retrospective analysis of a national data set for 3 cycles from 2019 to 2022. To generate a baseline and allow comparison of the hospital’s survey results with the aggregated findings from the database, the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles were calculated to set the percentage of values.

          Result

          Our results found that one of the barriers to developing a strong patient safety culture in Saudi Arabia is management support of patient safety, which caused a blame culture. This could explain the absence of improvement in the average percentage of reporting patient safety events for all 3 cycles. On the other hand, a decrease was observed in organizational learning/continuous improvement as well as a reduction in the positive percentage of patient safety ratings in the last cycle. Moreover, areas of strength in all 3 cycles did not reach the 75th percentile, whereas staffing and response to error domains remained the lowest-scoring composites in all cycles.

          Conclusion

          Our results have determined the percentile of the positive rate that could guide hospitals to improve their culture survey results. More investigations can focus on change over the years in both patient safety culture and the effectiveness of implementing interventions to measure the impact on quality of care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review.

          To determine the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies to improve hospital patient safety climate. Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, proQuest and psychinfo databases, with manual searches of quality and safety websites, bibliographies of included articles and key journals. English language studies published between January 1996 and April 2011 that measured the effectiveness of patient safety culture strategies using a quantitative measure of patient safety climate in a hospital setting. Studies included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series and historically controlled studies. Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. Study design, intervention, level of application, setting, study participants, safety climate outcome measures and implementation lessons were extracted from each article. Over 2000 articles were screened, with 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, one cluster RCT, seven controlled before and after studies, and 13 historically controlled studies. There was marked methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. Impacts of 11 different strategies were reported. There was some evidence to support that leadership walk rounds (p=0.02) and multi-faceted unit-based programmes (p < 0.05) may have a positive impact on patient safety climate. Despite strong face validity for a variety of patient safety culture strategies, there is limited evidence to support definitive impacts on patient safety climate outcomes. Organisations are advised to consider robust evaluation designs when implementing these potentially resource intensive strategies.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The current state of patient safety culture in Lebanese hospitals: a study at baseline.

            The objective of this study is to conduct a baseline assessment of patient safety culture in Lebanese hospitals. The study adopted a cross-sectional research design and utilized the hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC). Sixty-eight Lebanese hospitals participated in the study (54% of all hospitals). A total of 6807 hospital employees participated in the study including hospital-employed physicians, nurses, clinical and non-clinical staff, and others. The HSOPSC measures 12 composites of patient safety culture. Two of the composites (frequency of events reported and overall perception of safety), in addition to questions on patient safety grade and number of events reported, are the four outcome variables. Survey respondents were primarily employed in medical and surgical units. The dimensions with the highest positive ratings were teamwork within units, hospital management support for patient safety, and organizational learning and continuous improvement, while those with lowest ratings included staffing and non-punitive response to error. Approximately 60% of respondents reported not completing any event reports in the past 12 months and over 70% gave their hospitals an 'excellent/very good' patient safety grade. Bivariate and multivariate analysis revealed significant differences across hospitals of different size and accreditation status. Study findings provide evidence that can be used by policy makers, managers and leaders who are able to create the culture and commitment needed to identify and solve underlying systemic causes related to patient safety.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of patient safety culture in Saudi Arabian hospitals.

              Context Healthcare organisations in Saudi Arabia are striving to improve patient safety and quality of care through implementation of safety systems and creating a culture of safety. Objective The purpose of this study to evaluate the extent to which the culture supports patient safety at Saudi hospitals. Data Collection A survey questionnaire was distributed hospital-wide in 13 general hospitals in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia, to 223 health professionals including nurses, technicians, managers and medical staff. Measurement The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire was used to identify dimensions of patient safety culture. Results Overall Patient Safety Grade was rated as excellent or very good by 60% of respondents, acceptable by 33% and failing or poor by 7%. More than half of respondents thought that managers overlook safety problems that happen over and over. Areas of strength for most hospitals were organisational learning/continuous improvement, teamwork within units, feedback and communication about errors. Areas with potential for improvement for most hospitals were under-reporting of events, non-punitive response to error, staffing, teamwork across hospital units. Conclusion Leadership is a critical element to the effectiveness of patient safety initiatives. Response to errors is an important determinant of safety culture in healthcare organisations. In order for healthcare organisations to create a culture of safety and improvement, they must eliminate fear of blame and create a climate of open communication and continuous learning.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Patient Saf
                J Patient Saf
                JPS
                Journal of Patient Safety
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                1549-8417
                1549-8425
                December 2023
                26 September 2023
                : 19
                : 8
                : 517-524
                Affiliations
                From the []Technical Affair, Saudi Patient Safety Center (SPSC)
                []Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
                Author notes
                [*]Correspondence: Rabab Alkutbe, PhD, Saudi Patient Safety Center (SPSC), 9321 Wadi Al Hayah, Al Muruj, Riyadh 12264, Saudi Arabia (e-mail: dr.rabab.alkutbe@ 123456hotmail.com ).
                Article
                JPS_230360 00003
                10.1097/PTS.0000000000001165
                10666933
                37747958
                c002d856-7c78-4627-9a94-abd9d70e1ec1
                Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Original Studies
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                safety culture; patient safety,trending,percentile
                safety culture; patient safety, trending, percentile

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log