13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The assessment of those presenting to prison in-reach and court diversion services and those referred for admission to mental health services is a triage decision, allocating the patient to the appropriate level of therapeutic security. This is a critical clinical decision. We set out to improve on unstructured clinical judgement. We collated qualitative information and devised an 11 item structured professional judgment instrument for this purpose then tested for validity.

          Methods

          All those assessed following screening over a three month period at a busy remand committals prison (n = 246) were rated in a retrospective cohort design blind to outcome. Similarly, all those admitted to a mental health service from the same prison in-reach service over an overlapping two year period were rated blind to outcome (n = 100).

          Results

          The 11 item scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and inter-rater reliability. The scale score did not correlate with the HCR-20 'historical' score. For the three month sample, the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for those admitted to hospital was 0.893 (95% confidence interval 0.843 to 0.943). For the two year sample, AUC distinguished at each level between those admitted to open wards, low secure units or a medium/high secure service. Open wards v low secure units AUC = 0.805 (95% CI 0.680 to 0.930); low secure v medium/high secure AUC = 0.866, (95% CI 0.784 to 0.949). Item to outcome correlations were significant for all 11 items.

          Conclusions

          The DUNDRUM-1 triage security scale and its items performed to criterion levels when tested against the real world outcome. This instrument can be used to ensure consistency in decision making when deciding who to admit to secure forensic hospitals. It can also be used to benchmark admission thresholds between services and jurisdictions. In this study we found some divergence between assessed need and actual placement. This provides fertile ground for future research as well as practical assistance in assessing unmet need, auditing case mix and planning care pathways.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mental illness at reception into prison

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing the needs of patients in secure settings: A multi-disciplinary approach

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The North-West Region. I: Clinical features and placement needs of patients detained in Special Hospitals

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central
                1471-244X
                2011
                16 March 2011
                : 11
                : 43
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
                Article
                1471-244X-11-43
                10.1186/1471-244X-11-43
                3066108
                21410967
                c075932c-0a31-4aef-a0ad-ad8e5b6b9e2b
                Copyright ©2011 Flynn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 4 May 2010
                : 16 March 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article