23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prefrontal mechanisms of behavioral flexibility, emotion regulation and value updating

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two ideas have dominated the neuropsychology of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). One holds that OFC regulates emotion and enhances behavioral flexibility through inhibitory control. The other ascribes to OFC a role in updating valuations based on current motivational states. Neuroimaging, neurophysiological and clinical observations are consistent with either or both hypotheses. Although these hypotheses are compatible in principle, the present results support the latter view of OFC function and argue against the former. We show that excitotoxic, fibersparing lesions confined to OFC in monkeys do not alter either behavioral flexibility, as measured by object reversal learning, or emotion regulation, as assessed by snake fear. A follow-up experiment indicates that previous reports of a loss of inhibitory control resulted from damage to nearby fiber tracts and not from OFC dysfunction. Thus, OFC plays a more specialized role in reward-guided behavior and emotion than currently thought, a function that includes value updating.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex.

          The somatic marker hypothesis provides a systems-level neuroanatomical and cognitive framework for decision making and the influence on it by emotion. The key idea of this hypothesis is that decision making is a process that is influenced by marker signals that arise in bioregulatory processes, including those that express themselves in emotions and feelings. This influence can occur at multiple levels of operation, some of which occur consciously and some of which occur non-consciously. Here we review studies that confirm various predictions from the hypothesis. The orbitofrontal cortex represents one critical structure in a neural system subserving decision making. Decision making is not mediated by the orbitofrontal cortex alone, but arises from large-scale systems that include other cortical and subcortical components. Such structures include the amygdala, the somatosensory/insular cortices and the peripheral nervous system. Here we focus only on the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in decision making and emotional processing, and the relationship between emotion, decision making and other cognitive functions of the frontal lobe, namely working memory.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value.

            Economic choice is the behaviour observed when individuals select one among many available options. There is no intrinsically 'correct' answer: economic choice depends on subjective preferences. This behaviour is traditionally the object of economic analysis and is also of primary interest in psychology. However, the underlying mental processes and neuronal mechanisms are not well understood. Theories of human and animal choice have a cornerstone in the concept of 'value'. Consider, for example, a monkey offered one raisin versus one piece of apple: behavioural evidence suggests that the animal chooses by assigning values to the two options. But where and how values are represented in the brain is unclear. Here we show that, during economic choice, neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) encode the value of offered and chosen goods. Notably, OFC neurons encode value independently of visuospatial factors and motor responses. If a monkey chooses between A and B, neurons in the OFC encode the value of the two goods independently of whether A is presented on the right and B on the left, or vice versa. This trait distinguishes the OFC from other brain areas in which value modulates activity related to sensory or motor processes. Our results have broad implications for possible psychological models, suggesting that economic choice is essentially choice between goods rather than choice between actions. In this framework, neurons in the OFC seem to be a good candidate network for value assignment underlying economic choice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation--a possible prelude to violence.

              Emotion is normally regulated in the human brain by a complex circuit consisting of the orbital frontal cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, and several other interconnected regions. There are both genetic and environmental contributions to the structure and function of this circuitry. We posit that impulsive aggression and violence arise as a consequence of faulty emotion regulation. Indeed, the prefrontal cortex receives a major serotonergic projection, which is dysfunctional in individuals who show impulsive violence. Individuals vulnerable to faulty regulation of negative emotion are at risk for violence and aggression. Research on the neural circuitry of emotion regulation suggests new avenues of intervention for such at-risk populations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9809671
                21092
                Nat Neurosci
                Nat. Neurosci.
                Nature neuroscience
                1097-6256
                1546-1726
                28 June 2013
                23 June 2013
                August 2013
                01 February 2014
                : 16
                : 8
                : 1140-1145
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Section on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence to: Dr. Peter H. Rudebeck, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, NIMH, Building 49, Suite 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4415, USA, Tel: +1 301 443 7396, Fax: +1 301 402 0046, rudebeckp@ 123456mail.nih.gov
                Article
                NIHMS483559
                10.1038/nn.3440
                3733248
                23792944
                c0a73e21-1d5b-4423-8332-21f4e36f521d

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article