18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Structural Dissection of a Gating Mechanism Preventing Misactivation of Ubiquitin by NEDD8’s E1

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Post-translational covalent modification by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs) is a major eukaryotic mechanism for regulating protein function. In general, each UBL has its own E1 that serves as the entry point for a cascade. The E1 first binds the UBL and catalyzes adenylation of the UBL’s C-terminus, prior to promoting UBL transfer to a downstream E2. Ubiquitin’s Arg 72, which corresponds to Ala72 in the UBL NEDD8, is a key E1 selectivity determinant: swapping ubiquitin and NEDD8 residue 72 identity was shown previously to swap their E1 specificity. Correspondingly, Arg190 in the UBA3 subunit of NEDD8’s heterodimeric E1 (the APPBP1-UBA3 complex), which corresponds to a Gln in ubiquitin’s E1 UBA1, is a key UBL selectivity determinant. Here, we dissect this specificity with biochemical and X-ray crystallographic analysis of APPBP1-UBA3-NEDD8 complexes in which NEDD8’s residue 72 and UBA3’s residue 190 are substituted with different combinations of Ala, Arg, or Gln. APPBP1-UBA3’s preference for NEDD8’s Ala72 appears to be indirect, due to proper positioning of UBA3’s Arg190. By contrast, our data are consistent with direct positive interactions between ubiquitin’s Arg72 and an E1’s Gln. However, APPBP1-UBA3’s failure to interact with a UBL having Arg72 is not due to a lack of this favorable interaction, but rather arises from UBA3’s Arg190 acting as a negative gate. Thus, parallel residues from different UBL pathways can utilize distinct mechanisms to dictate interaction selectivity, and specificity can be amplified by barriers that prevent binding to components of different conjugation cascades.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models.

          Map interpretation remains a critical step in solving the structure of a macromolecule. Errors introduced at this early stage may persist throughout crystallographic refinement and result in an incorrect structure. The normally quoted crystallographic residual is often a poor description for the quality of the model. Strategies and tools are described that help to alleviate this problem. These simplify the model-building process, quantify the goodness of fit of the model on a per-residue basis and locate possible errors in peptide and side-chain conformations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms.

            Ubiquitin is the founding member of a family of structurally conserved proteins that regulate a host of processes in eukaryotic cells. Ubiquitin and its relatives carry out their functions through covalent attachment to other cellular proteins, thereby changing the stability, localization, or activity of the target protein. This article reviews the basic biochemistry of these protein conjugation reactions, focusing on ubiquitin itself and emphasizing recent insights into mechanism and specificity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improving biosensor analysis.

              The quality of optical biosensor data must be improved in order to characterize the mechanism and rate constants associated with molecular interactions. Many of the artifacts associated with binding data can be minimized or eliminated by designing the experiment properly, collecting data under optimum conditions and processing the data with reference surfaces. It is possible to globally fit high-quality biosensor data with simple bimolecular reaction models, which validates the technology as a biophysical tool for interaction analysis. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biochemistry
                bi
                bichaw
                Biochemistry
                American Chemical Society
                0006-2960
                1520-4995
                25 July 2008
                26 August 2008
                : 47
                : 34
                : 8961-8969
                Affiliations
                [1]Departments of Structural Biology and Genetics/Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, Hartwell Center for Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis Tennessee 38105
                Author notes
                [†]

                This work was supported in part by ALSAC (American Syrian Lebanese Associated Charities), grants from the NIH (R01GM069530 and R01GM077053 to B.A.S., 5P01CA0719075 to M.F.R., P30CA021765 to St. Jude Cancer Center) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Use of the National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory and the Advanced Light Source was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contracts No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 and DE-AC02-05CH11231, respectively. B.A.S. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

                [‡]

                RCSB access codes: 3DBH, 3DBL, and 3DBR.

                [* ] To whom correspondence should be addressed: St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, MS #311, 332 N. Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105. Phone: 901-495-5147. E-mail: Brenda.schulman@ 123456stjude.org .
                [§]

                Departments of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.

                [∥]

                Genetics/Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.

                [⊥]

                Hartwell Center for Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.

                [#]

                Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

                [∇]

                Present Address: University of Tennessee College of Medicine, 930 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163.

                [○]

                Present Address: Rhodes College, 2000 N. Parkway, Memphis, TN 38112.

                Article
                10.1021/bi800604c
                2587436
                18652489
                c0b90ca2-66de-416c-89cb-2ac64c70462c
                Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.

                40.75

                History
                : 26 August 2008
                : 25 July 2008
                : 5 April 2008
                : 4 June 2008
                Funding
                National Institutes of Health, United States
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                bi800604c
                bi-2008-00604c

                Biochemistry
                Biochemistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article