67
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Results of ulnar nerve neurotization to biceps brachii muscle in brachial plexus injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE:

          To evaluate the factors influencing the results of ulnar nerve neurotization at the motor branch of the brachii biceps muscle, aiming at the restoration of elbow flexion in patients with brachial plexus injury.

          METHODS:

          19 patients, with 18 men and 1 woman, mean age 28.7 years. Eight patients had injury to roots C5-C6 and 11, to roots C5-C6-C7. The average time interval between injury and surgery was 7.5 months. Four patients had cervical fractures associated with brachial plexus injury. The postoperative follow-up was 15.7 months.

          RESULTS:

          Eight patients recovered elbow flexion strength MRC grade 4; two, MRC grade 3 and nine, MRC <3. There was no impairment of the previous ulnar nerve function.

          CONCLUSION:

          The surgical results of ulnar nerve neurotization at the motor branch of brachii biceps muscle are dependent on the interval between brachial plexus injury and surgical treatment, the presence of associated fractures of the cervical spine and occipital condyle, residual function of the C8-T1 roots after the injury and the involvement of the C7 root. Signs of reinnervation manifested up to 3 months after surgery showed better results in the long term. Level of Evidence: IV, Case Series.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases.

          Four patients with C5-C6 root avulsion after brachial plexus injury were treated with a transfer of part of a normal functioning nerve in the arm to the motor nerve of the biceps. Ten percent of the bulk of the ulnar nerve was harvested for a suture directly to the motor nerve of the biceps with no significant impairment of hand function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature.

            We report the results of 15 patients who underwent nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder and elbow function at our institution for traumatic brachial plexus palsy. We present these results in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature, designed to quantitatively assess the efficacy of individual nerve transfers for restoration of elbow and shoulder function in a large number of patients. One thousand eighty-eight nerve transfers from 27 studies met the inclusion criteria of the analysis. Seventy-two percent of direct intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers (without interposition nerve grafts) achieved biceps strength > or =M3 versus 47% using interposition grafts. Direct intercostal transfers to the musculocutaneous nerve had a better ability to achieve > or =M4 elbow strength than transfers from the spinal accessory nerve (41% vs 29%). The suprascapular nerve fared significantly better than the axillary nerve in obtaining > or =M3 shoulder abduction (92% vs 69%). At our institution 90% of intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers (n = 10) achieved > or =M3 bicep strength and 70% achieved > or =M4 strength. Four of seven patients achieved > or =M3 shoulder abduction with a single nerve transfer and 6 of 7 regained > or =M3 strength with a dual nerve transfer. This study suggests that interposition nerve grafts should be avoided when possible when performing nerve transfers. Better results for restoration of elbow flexion have been attained with intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers than with spinal accessory nerve transfers and spinal accessory to suprascapular transfers appear to have the best outcomes for return of shoulder abduction. We conclude that nerve transfer is an effective means to restore elbow and shoulder function in brachial plexus paralysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neurotization in brachial plexus injuries. Indication and results.

              In neurotization or nerve transfer, a healthy but less valuable nerve or its proximal stump is transferred in order to reinnervate a more important sensory or motor territory that has lost its innervation through irreparable damage to its nerve. In brachial plexus injuries, extraplexal nerves such as the spinal accessory nerve, rami of the cervical plexus, or intercostal nerves are transferred onto trunks, cords, or individual nerves or else segments of the brachial plexus that maintain continuity with the spinal cord may be coapted to trunks or cords the surgeon wishes to innervate. This method is particularly indicated in root avulsion injuries that occur frequently following traction trauma to the brachial plexus. The authors convey their experience with neurotization using the long thoracic nerve in seven cases, the accessory nerve in 30 cases, intercostal nerves in 66 cases, and various nerve transfers within the plexus in 31 cases. Results of other authors are also reported. With these methods, it is possible to obtain good elbow flexion in more than one-half of patients; however, only limited shoulder function and no useful finger function are obtained.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Ortop Bras
                Acta Ortop Bras
                Acta ortop. bras.
                Acta Ortopedica Brasileira
                Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
                1413-7852
                1809-4406
                December 2012
                : 20
                : 6
                : 317-323
                Affiliations
                Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Hospital das Clínicas of the School of Medicine of Universidade de São Paulo
                Author notes
                Mailing address: Rua Barata Ribeiro, 237, cj. 13/14 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. CEP. 01308-000 Email: marcelo@ 123456marcelorosaderezende.com.br

                All the authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this article.

                Article
                10.1590/S1413-78522012000600001
                3861952
                24453624
                c0d5728d-43c6-4f1f-8015-1a11e18e94d4

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 February 2011
                : 11 April 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 4, References: 25, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Article

                brachial plexus/injuries,elbow/injuries,nerve transfer,ulnar nerve

                Comments

                Comment on this article