18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Arithmetic of Emotion: Integration of Incidental and Integral Affect in Judgments and Decisions

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Research has demonstrated that two types of affect have an influence on judgment and decision making: incidental affect (affect unrelated to a judgment or decision such as a mood) and integral affect (affect that is part of the perceiver’s internal representation of the option or target under consideration). So far, these two lines of research have seldom crossed so that knowledge concerning their combined effects is largely missing. To fill this gap, the present review highlights differences and similarities between integral and incidental affect. Further, common and unique mechanisms that enable these two types of affect to influence judgment and choices are identified. Finally, some basic principles for affect integration when the two sources co-occur are outlined. These mechanisms are discussed in relation to existing work that has focused on incidental or integral affect but not both.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Emotion and Decision Making

            A revolution in the science of emotion has emerged in recent decades, with the potential to create a paradigm shift in decision theories. The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, pervasive, predictable, sometimes harmful and sometimes beneficial drivers of decision making. Across different domains, important regularities appear in the mechanisms through which emotions influence judgments and choices. We organize and analyze what has been learned from the past 35 years of work on emotion and decision making. In so doing, we propose the emotion-imbued choice model, which accounts for inputs from traditional rational choice theory and from newer emotion research, synthesizing scientific models.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.

              Early studies of intuitive judgment and decision making conducted with the late Amos Tversky are reviewed in the context of two related concepts: an analysis of accessibility, the ease with which thoughts come to mind; a distinction between effortless intuition and deliberate reasoning. Intuitive thoughts, like percepts, are highly accessible. Determinants and consequences of accessibility help explain the central results of prospect theory, framing effects, the heuristic process of attribute substitution, and the characteristic biases that result from the substitution of nonextensional for extensional attributes. Variations in the accessibility of rules explain the occasional corrections of intuitive judgments. The study of biases is compatible with a view of intuitive thinking and decision making as generally skilled and successful.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                08 March 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 325
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Linköping University Linköping, Sweden
                [2] 2Decision Research Eugene, OR, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Bernd Weber, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Germany

                Reviewed by: Britt Anderson, University of Waterloo, Canada; Giorgio Coricelli, University of Southern California, USA

                *Correspondence: Daniel Västfjäll, daniel.vastfjall@ 123456liu.se

                This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00325
                4782160
                27014136
                c107f6cf-06e2-4cd5-80c5-665e7ca362db
                Copyright © 2016 Västfjäll, Slovic, Burns, Erlandsson, Koppel, Asutay and Tinghög.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 January 2016
                : 21 February 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 82, Pages: 10, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001
                Funded by: Vetenskapsrådet 10.13039/501100004359
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                emotions,incidental affect,integral affect,judgment,decision making

                Comments

                Comment on this article