6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Computational Synaptic Antibody Characterization Tool for Array Tomography

      methods-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Application-specific validation of antibodies is a critical prerequisite for their successful use. Here we introduce an automated framework for characterization and screening of antibodies against synaptic molecules for high-resolution immunofluorescence array tomography (AT). The proposed Synaptic Antibody Characterization Tool (SACT) is designed to provide an automatic, robust, flexible, and efficient tool for antibody characterization at scale. SACT automatically detects puncta of immunofluorescence labeling from candidate antibodies and determines whether a punctum belongs to a synapse. The molecular composition and size of the target synapses expected to contain the antigen is determined by the user, based on biological knowledge. Operationally, the presence of a synapse is defined by the colocalization or adjacency of the candidate antibody punctum to one or more reference antibody puncta. The outputs of SACT are automatically computed measurements such as target synapse density and target specificity ratio that reflect the sensitivity and specificity of immunolabeling with a given candidate antibody. These measurements provide an objective way to characterize and compare the performance of different antibodies against the same target, and can be used to objectively select the antibodies best suited for AT and potentially for other immunolabeling applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The postsynaptic organization of synapses.

          The postsynaptic side of the synapse is specialized to receive the neurotransmitter signal released from the presynaptic terminal and transduce it into electrical and biochemical changes in the postsynaptic cell. The cardinal functional components of the postsynaptic specialization of excitatory and inhibitory synapses are the ionotropic receptors (ligand-gated channels) for glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), respectively. These receptor channels are concentrated at the postsynaptic membrane and embedded in a dense and rich protein network comprised of anchoring and scaffolding molecules, signaling enzymes, cytoskeletal components, as well as other membrane proteins. Excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic specializations are quite different in molecular organization. The postsynaptic density of excitatory synapses is especially complex and dynamic in composition and regulation; it contains hundreds of different proteins, many of which are required for cognitive function and implicated in psychiatric illness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Single-synapse analysis of a diverse synapse population: proteomic imaging methods and markers.

            A lack of methods for measuring the protein compositions of individual synapses in situ has so far hindered the exploration and exploitation of synapse molecular diversity. Here, we describe the use of array tomography, a new high-resolution proteomic imaging method, to determine the composition of glutamate and GABA synapses in somatosensory cortex of Line-H-YFP Thy-1 transgenic mice. We find that virtually all synapses are recognized by antibodies to the presynaptic phosphoprotein synapsin I, while antibodies to 16 other synaptic proteins discriminate among 4 subtypes of glutamatergic synapses and GABAergic synapses. Cell-specific YFP expression in the YFP-H mouse line allows synapses to be assigned to specific presynaptic and postsynaptic partners and reveals that a subpopulation of spines on layer 5 pyramidal cells receives both VGluT1-subtype glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic inputs. These results establish a means for the high-throughput acquisition of proteomic data from individual cortical synapses in situ. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Formation of dendritic spines with GABAergic synapses induced by whisker stimulation in adult mice.

              During development, alterations in sensory experience modify the structure of cortical neurons, particularly at the level of the dendritic spine. Are similar adaptations involved in plasticity of the adult cortex? Here we show that a 24 hr period of single whisker stimulation in freely moving adult mice increases, by 36%, the total synaptic density in the corresponding cortical barrel. This is due to an increase in both excitatory and inhibitory synapses found on spines. Four days after stimulation, the inhibitory inputs to the spines remain despite total synaptic density returning to pre-stimulation levels. Functional analysis of layer IV cells demonstrated altered response properties, immediately after stimulation, as well as four days later. These results indicate activity-dependent alterations in synaptic circuitry in adulthood, modifying the flow of sensory information into the cerebral cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neuroanat
                Front Neuroanat
                Front. Neuroanat.
                Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5129
                17 July 2018
                2018
                : 12
                : 51
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [2] 2Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis , Davis, CA, United States
                [3] 3Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, NC, United States
                [4] 4Synapse Biology, Allen Institute for Brain Science , Seattle, WA, United States
                [5] 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Computer Science, Department of Mathematics, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [6] 6Molecular and Cellular Physiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Nicolas Heck, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France

                Reviewed by: Marianne Renner, Sorbonne Universités, France; David C. Martinelli, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, United States

                *Correspondence: Anish K. Simhal anish.simhal@ 123456duke.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnana.2018.00051
                6057115
                30065633
                c13681d1-861f-4a7d-a9e0-d954c1ce6afd
                Copyright © 2018 Simhal, Gong, Trimmer, Weinberg, Smith, Sapiro and Micheva.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 March 2018
                : 28 May 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 4, Equations: 3, References: 22, Pages: 16, Words: 9981
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Methods

                Neurosciences
                synapse,antibodies,array tomography,synapse detection,proteometric composition,automatic algorithms,antibody characterization

                Comments

                Comment on this article