0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of increasing the levels of insoluble fiber and on the method of diet formulation measures of energy and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The objective of this study was to determine the differences in response to distillers dried grains with solubles ( DDGS) level under constant nutrient or floating nutrient concentrations. A total of 21 ileal-cannulated gilts (33.1 ± 0.4 kg body weight) were randomly allotted to one of seven dietary treatments in a 3-period incomplete Latin square design ( n = 9). Treatments consisted of a 0% DDGS basal diet, plus diets containing 15%, 30%, or 45% DDGS. Diets were formulated using one of two different formulation methods: 1) constant nutrient ( CNU) where nutrients were held equal to the basal diet or 2) constant ingredients ( CIN) where DDGS were added at the expense of corn and all other ingredients remained constant, so nutrient levels were allowed to “float.” Chromic oxide was added to the diets at 0.5% as an indigestible marker. Increasing the level of DDGS decreased the apparent ileal digestibility ( AID) of dry matter ( DM), gross energy ( GE), starch, dispensable amino acids ( AA), and fiber components ( P < 0.050). The decrease in the AID of Lys, Met, Thr, and Trp was more pronounced under CNU compared with the CIN formulation method ( P < 0.050). The decrease in the AID of hemicellulose was less pronounced under CNU compared with the CIN formulation method ( P = 0.045). There was a DDGS level × formulation method interaction for the AID of acid hydrolyzed ether extract ( AEE; P = 0.015); for the CNU formulation method, increasing level of DDGS decreased the AID of AEE from 0% to 30% and remained similar from 30% to 45% DDGS, whereas the CIN had no effect on the AID of AEE. Increasing the level of DDGS decreased the apparent total tract digestibility ( ATTD) of DM, GE, and fiber components ( P < 0.050), except for acid detergent fiber, which was not affected. The decrease in the ATTD of insoluble dietary fiber and total dietary fiber was less pronounced under CNU compared with CIN ( P < 0.050). The ATTD of AEE decreased for CNU compared with CIN ( P < 0.010). In conclusion, increasing the insoluble fiber level in the form of DDGS decreased the digestibility of most dietary components, including DM, GE, starch, insoluble fiber, and AA. The CNU and CIN formulation methods are equivalent when evaluating the digestibilities of DM, GE, starch, crude protein, and AA (when they were not added in purified synthetic forms). Differences between CNU and CIN formulation methods were detected for the digestibility of insoluble fiber, fat, and essential AA (when added as crystalline AA).

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          AN IMPROVED PROCEDURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CHROMIC OXIDE IN FEED AND FECES

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The role of dietary fibre in the digestive physiology of the pig

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Anim Sci
                J. Anim. Sci
                jansci
                Journal of Animal Science
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0021-8812
                1525-3163
                June 2020
                21 April 2020
                21 April 2020
                : 98
                : 6
                : skaa130
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University , Ames, IA
                [2 ] Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois , Urbana, IL
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: jfp@ 123456iastate.edu
                Article
                skaa130
                10.1093/jas/skaa130
                7275632
                32315034
                c136a6b3-4118-4b1c-9835-2db140aa6333
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 04 February 2020
                : 18 April 2020
                : 06 June 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: Iowa Pork Producers Association, DOI 10.13039/100010576;
                Categories
                Non Ruminant Nutrition
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00960

                amino acids,ileal-cannulation,insoluble fiber,soluble fiber,starch,swine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content27

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors296