46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Machiavellian Leader Effectiveness : The Moderating Role of Political Skill

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Research on the effectiveness of Machiavellian leaders has found contradictory results. By linking socioanalytic and trait activation theory to the Machiavellianism and leadership literature, we argue that political skill may explain these findings by moderating the relation between Machiavellianism and leadership effectiveness. Using a multisource design and moderated mediation analyses with 153 leaders, 287 subordinates, and 153 superiors, we show that leaders who are both strongly politically skilled and high on Machiavellianism successfully enact transformational leadership, mediating improved leader effectiveness. However, when leader political skill is low, high Machiavellianism is negatively associated with (subordinate-rated) transformational leadership, resulting in lower leader effectiveness ratings by superiors. We discuss these results in light of current research on Machiavellianism in leadership and work contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.

          Despite the concern that has been expressed about potential method biases, and the pervasiveness of research settings with the potential to produce them, there is disagreement about whether they really are a problem for researchers in the behavioral sciences. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to explore the current state of knowledge about method biases. First, we explore the meaning of the terms "method" and "method bias" and then we examine whether method biases influence all measures equally. Next, we review the evidence of the effects that method biases have on individual measures and on the covariation between different constructs. Following this, we evaluate the procedural and statistical remedies that have been used to control method biases and provide recommendations for minimizing method bias.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation.

            I describe a test of linear moderated mediation in path analysis based on an interval estimate of the parameter of a function linking the indirect effect to values of a moderator-a parameter that I call the index of moderated mediation. This test can be used for models that integrate moderation and mediation in which the relationship between the indirect effect and the moderator is estimated as linear, including many of the models described by Edwards and Lambert ( 2007 ) and Preacher, Rucker, and Hayes ( 2007 ) as well as extensions of these models to processes involving multiple mediators operating in parallel or in serial. Generalization of the method to latent variable models is straightforward. Three empirical examples describe the computation of the index and the test, and its implementation is illustrated using Mplus and the PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity.

              This study provided a comprehensive examination of the full range of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. Results (based on 626 correlations from 87 sources) revealed an overall validity of .44 for transformational leadership, and this validity generalized over longitudinal and multisource designs. Contingent reward (.39) and laissez-faire (-.37) leadership had the next highest overall relations; management by exception (active and passive) was inconsistently related to the criteria. Surprisingly, there were several criteria for which contingent reward leadership had stronger relations than did transformational leadership. Furthermore, transformational leadership was strongly correlated with contingent reward (.80) and laissez-faire (-.65) leadership. Transformational and contingent reward leadership generally predicted criteria controlling for the other leadership dimensions, although transformational leadership failed to predict leader job performance. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                pps
                Journal of Personnel Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1866-5888
                2190-5150
                September 14, 2021
                January 2022
                : 21
                : 1
                : 1-10
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Germany
                [ 2 ]Michael A. Leven School of Management Entrepreneurship and Hospitality, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA
                Author notes
                Gerhard Blickle, Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111 Bonn, Germany, gerhard.blickle@ 123456uni-bonn.de
                Article
                pps_21_1_1
                10.1027/1866-5888/a000284
                c13c8d43-35de-4b17-a75b-6c85c6947831
                Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

                Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY 4.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

                History
                : February 5, 2021
                : May 13, 2021
                : May 14, 2021
                Funding
                Funding: Open access publication enabled by Bonn University and State Library, Germany.
                Categories
                Original Article

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General behavioral science
                Machiavellianism,transformational leader behavior,political skill,leader effectiveness

                Comments

                Comment on this article