6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction.

      1 , , ,
      Journal of clinical epidemiology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We have compared two philosophically different methods for selecting items for a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. The impact method selects items that are most frequently perceived as important by patients whereas the psychometric method (factor analysis) selects items primarily according to their relationships with one another.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Clin Epidemiol
          Journal of clinical epidemiology
          Elsevier BV
          0895-4356
          0895-4356
          Mar 1997
          : 50
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
          Article
          S0895-4356(96)00377-0
          10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00377-0
          9120521
          c17328c3-cfa1-4bf9-8812-6f0ca4566ee6
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article