2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association Between Loss-of-Function Mutations Within the FANCM Gene and Early-Onset Familial Breast Cancer

      brief-report
      , MSc 1 , 2 , , PhD 1 , 2 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 4 , , PhD 4 , , MD 5 , 6 , , PhD 5 , , MSc 7 , , PhD 7 , , PhD 8 , 9 , , PhD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 12 , 13 , , PhD 2 , 12 , 14 , , MSc 1 , 2 , , MSc 1 , , MD 15 , , MD 16 , 17 , , MD 8 , 17 , 18 , , PhD 1 , 2 , , MD 19 , , MD 1 , 2 , , PhD 3 , , MD 1 , 2 , , PhD 1 , 2 ,
      JAMA Oncology
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Do inactivating germline mutations within the FANCM gene increase breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer risk?

          Findings

          This case-control study included 2047 BRCA1 and BRCA2–negative familial breast cancer cases and 2187 controls and revealed an association of FANCM mutations with breast cancer. More pronounced associations were identified for early-onset (before age 51 years) breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer. Analysis of 628 unselected ovarian cancer cases revealed no significant association.

          Meaning

          We suggest FANCM be included in diagnostic gene panel testing for individual breast cancer risk assessment.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Germline mutations in established moderately or highly penetrant risk genes for breast cancer (BC) and/or ovarian cancer (OC), including BRCA1 and BRCA2, explain fewer than half of all familial BC and/or OC cases. Based on the genotyping of 2 loss-of-function (LoF) variants c.5101C>T (p.GIn1701Ter [ rs147021911]) and c.5791C>T (p.Arg1931Ter [ rs144567652]), the FANCM gene has been suggested as a novel BC predisposition gene, while the analysis of the entire coding region of the FANCM gene in familial index cases and geographically matched controls is pending.

          Objectives

          To assess the mutational spectrum within the FANCM gene, and to determine a potential association of LoF germline mutations within the FANCM gene with BC and/or OC risk.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          For the purpose of identification and characterization of novel BC and/or OC predisposition genes, a total of 2047 well-characterized familial BC index cases, 628 OC cases, and 2187 geographically matched controls were screened for LoF mutations within the FANCM gene by next-generation sequencing. All patients previously tested negative for pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. All data collection occurred between June 1, 2013, and April 30, 2016. Data analysis was performed from May 1, 2016, to July 1, 2016.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          FANCM LoF mutation frequencies in patients with BC and/or OC were compared with the FANCM LoF mutation frequencies in geographically matched controls by univariate logistic regression. Positive associations were stratified by age at onset and cancer family history.

          Results

          In this case-control study, 2047 well-characterized familial female BC index cases, 628 OC cases, and 2187 geographically matched controls were screened for truncating FANCM alterations. Heterozygous LoF mutations within the FANCM gene were significantly associated with familial BC risk, with an overall odds ratio (OR) of 2.05 (95% CI, 0.94-4.54; P = .049) and a mutation frequency of 1.03% in index cases. In familial patients whose BC onset was before age 51 years, an elevated OR of 2.44 (95% CI, 1.08-5.59; P = .02) was observed. A more pronounced association was identified for patients with a triple-negative BC tumor phenotype (OR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.00-12.85; P = .02). No significant association was detected for unselected OC cases (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.57-5.08; P = .27).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Based on the significant associations of heterozygous LoF mutations with early-onset or triple-negative BC, FANCM should be included in diagnostic gene panel testing for individual risk assessment. Larger studies are required to determine age-dependent disease risks for BC and to assess a potential role of FANCM mutations in OC pathogenesis.

          Abstract

          This case-control study analyzed the entire coding region of the FANCM gene to find its association with breast and ovarian cancer risk.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA Oncol
          JAMA Oncol
          JAMA Oncol
          JAMA Oncology
          American Medical Association
          2374-2437
          2374-2445
          29 December 2016
          September 2017
          29 December 2017
          : 3
          : 9
          : 1245-1248
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
          [2 ]Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
          [3 ]Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
          [4 ]Department of Human Genetics and Biozentrum, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
          [5 ]Institute for Clinical Genetics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
          [6 ]Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
          [7 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
          [8 ]Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
          [9 ]Department of Genomics, Life & Brain Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
          [10 ]Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
          [11 ]Institute of Epidemiology and Biobank PopGen, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
          [12 ]Cologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
          [13 ]Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
          [14 ]Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, Cologne, Germany
          [15 ]Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
          [16 ]German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
          [17 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
          [18 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
          [19 ]Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
          Author notes
          Article Information
          Accepted for Publication: September 30, 2016.
          Corresponding Author: Eric Hahnen, PhD, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 34, 50931 Cologne, Germany ( eric.hahnen@ 123456uk-koeln.de ).
          Published Online: December 29, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5592
          Author Contributions: Dr Hahnen had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Mr Neidhardt and Dr Hauke shared first authorship.
          Study concept and design: Hahnen.
          Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
          Drafting of the manuscript: Neidhardt, Meindl, Schmutzler, Hahnen, Hauke.
          Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
          Statistical analysis: Engel, Ernst, Neidhardt.
          Obtained funding: Schmutzler.
          Study supervision: Hahnen, Schmutzler.
          Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
          Funding/Support: This study was supported by the German Cancer Aid grant 109076. Whole exome sequencing data were analyzed on a high-performance cluster of the Regional Computing Center of Cologne, Germany, with aid from a grant by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
          Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
          Additional Contributions: We are very thankful to all family members who participated in this study.
          Article
          PMC5824291 PMC5824291 5824291 cbr160014
          10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5592
          5824291
          28033443
          c17b53c2-22f3-46cb-a860-35e60404db2a
          Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
          History
          : 6 July 2016
          : 30 September 2016
          : 30 September 2016
          Funding
          Funded by: German Cancer Aid
          Categories
          Research
          Research
          Brief Report
          Online First

          Comments

          Comment on this article