28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Association Between School Closures and Child Mental Health During COVID-19

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , , ScD, MPH 2 , 3 , , MD, MPH 2 , 3 , , MD, MPH 2 , 3
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is there an association between school closures and child mental health outcomes, and how does it vary by key sociodemographic characteristics?

          Findings

          In this survey study of 2324 adults with at least 1 school-aged child, a small association between school closures and worse child mental health outcomes was observed, with older children and children from families with lower income experiencing more mental health problems associated with school closures. Children from families with lower income and those belonging to minority racial/ethnic groups were most likely to experience school closures.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest older and Black and Hispanic children as well as children from families with lower income who attend school remotely may experience disproportionate mental health difficulties.

          Abstract

          This survey study estimates the association between school closures and child mental health outcomes and examines how this association varies across sociodemographic factors.

          Abstract

          Importance

          In-person schooling has been disrupted for most school-aged youth during the COVID-19 pandemic, with low-income, Black, and Hispanic populations most likely to receive fully remote instruction. Disruptions to in-person schooling may have negatively and inequitably affected children’s mental health.

          Objective

          To estimate the association between school closures and child mental health outcomes and how it varies across sociodemographic factors.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional population-based survey study included a nationally representative sample of US adults aged 18 to 64 years with at least 1 child in the household. The survey was administered between December 2 and December 21, 2020, via web and telephone in English and Spanish. Participants were recruited from the NORC AmeriSpeak panel, an address-based panel with known probability sampling and coverage of 97% of US households.

          Exposures

          Schooling modality (in person, fully remote, or hybrid), household income, age.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Child mental health difficulties were measured with the parent-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, with small, medium, and large effect sizes defined as 1.3-, 3.3-, and 5.2-point differences, respectively.

          Results

          A total of 2324 adults completed the survey. Overall, 1671 respondents (71.9%) were women, 244 (10.5%) were Black, 372 (16.0%) were Hispanic, and 421 (18.1%) had a high school education or less. Children attending school in-person had higher household incomes (mean difference, $9719; 95% CI, $4327 to $15 111; P < .001) and were more likely to be White compared with those attending remotely (366 of 556 [65.8%] vs 597 of 1340 [44.5%]; P < .001). Older children in remote schooling had more mental health difficulties than those attending in-person schooling (standardized effect size, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.39] per year older; P = .006), corresponding to small effect sizes in favor of in-person schooling for older children and very small effect sizes favoring remote schooling for younger children. Children from families with higher income benefitted more from attending schools in-person compared with their peers from families with lower income (B = −0.20 [95% CI, −0.10 to −0.30] per $10 000-increase in annual income; P < .001), although this advantage was not apparent for children attending hybrid school (B = −0.05 [95% CI, −0.16 to 0.06] per $10 000-increase in annual income; P = .34), and directionally lower but not significantly different for children attending remote school (B = −0.12 [95% CI, −0.04 to −0.20] per $10 000-increase in annual income; P < .001). Learning pods fully buffered the associations of hybrid schooling ( d = −0.25; 95% CI, −0.47 to −0.04) but not remote schooling ( d = 0.04; 95% CI, −0.10 to 0.18) with negative mental health outcomes.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The findings of this study suggest that older and Black and Hispanic children as well as those from families with lower income who attend school remotely may experience greater impairment to mental health than their younger, White, and higher-income counterparts. Ensuring that all students have access to additional educational and mental health resources must be an important public health priority, met with appropriate funding and workforce augmentation, during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

          <i>Statistical Power Analysis</i> is a nontechnical guide to power analysis in research planning that provides users of applied statistics with the tools they need for more effective analysis. The Second Edition includes: <br> * a chapter covering power analysis in set correlation and multivariate methods;<br> * a chapter considering effect size, psychometric reliability, and the efficacy of "qualifying" dependent variables and;<br> * expanded power and sample size tables for multiple regression/correlation.<br>
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.

              R. Goodman (1997)
              A novel behavioural screening questionnaire, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), was administered along with Rutter questionnaires to parents and teachers of 403 children drawn from dental and psychiatric clinics. Scores derived from the SDQ and Rutter questionnaires were highly correlated; parent-teacher correlations for the two sets of measures were comparable or favoured the SDQ. The two sets of measures did not differ in their ability to discriminate between psychiatric and dental clinic attenders. These preliminary findings suggest that the SDQ functions as well as the Rutter questionnaires while offering the following additional advantages: a focus on strengths as well as difficulties; better coverage of inattention, peer relationships, and prosocial behaviour; a shorter format; and a single form suitable for both parents and teachers, perhaps thereby increasing parent-teacher correlations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                3 September 2021
                September 2021
                3 September 2021
                : 4
                : 9
                : e2124092
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
                [2 ]Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle, Washington
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 3, 2021.
                Published: September 3, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24092
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Hawrilenko M et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Matt Hawrilenko, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 ( mhavril@ 123456uw.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Hawrilenko had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: All authors.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Hawrilenko, Tandon, Christakis.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Hawrilenko, Kroshus.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hawrilenko, Tandon, Christakis.
                Statistical analysis: Hawrilenko.
                Obtained funding: Hawrilenko, Kroshus, Christakis.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by grant 2027570 from the National Science Foundation.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi210701
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24092
                8417763
                34477850
                c17e1576-557f-4a0f-973e-e366093cb16c
                Copyright 2021 Hawrilenko M et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 20 April 2021
                : 3 July 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Public Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article