57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Engineered TCR-T Cell Immunotherapy in Anticancer Precision Medicine: Pros and Cons

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This review provides insight into the role of engineered T-cell receptors (TCRs) in immunotherapy. Novel approaches have been developed to boost anticancer immune system, including targeting new antigens, manufacturing new engineered or modified TCRs, and creating a safety switch for endo-suicide genes. In order to re-activate T cells against tumors, immune-mobilizing monoclonal TCRs against cancer (ImmTAC) have been developed as a novel class of manufactured molecules which are bispecific and recognize both cancer and T cells. The TCRs target special antigens such as NY-ESO-1, AHNAK S2580F or ERBB2 H473Y to boost the efficacy of anticancer immunotherapy. The safety of genetically modified T cells is very important. Therefore, this review discusses pros and cons of different approaches, such as ImmTAC, Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK), and inducible caspase-9 in cancer immunotherapy. Clinical trials related to TCR-T cell therapy and monoclonal antibodies designed for overcoming immunosuppression, and recent advances made in understanding how TCRs are additionally examined. New approaches that can better detect antigens and drive an effective T cell response are discussed as well.

          Related collections

          Most cited references103

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

          This article provides a status report on the global burden of cancer worldwide using the GLOBOCAN 2018 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a focus on geographic variability across 20 world regions. There will be an estimated 18.1 million new cancer cases (17.0 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 9.6 million cancer deaths (9.5 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) in 2018. In both sexes combined, lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer (11.6% of the total cases) and the leading cause of cancer death (18.4% of the total cancer deaths), closely followed by female breast cancer (11.6%), prostate cancer (7.1%), and colorectal cancer (6.1%) for incidence and colorectal cancer (9.2%), stomach cancer (8.2%), and liver cancer (8.2%) for mortality. Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among males, followed by prostate and colorectal cancer (for incidence) and liver and stomach cancer (for mortality). Among females, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal and lung cancer (for incidence), and vice versa (for mortality); cervical cancer ranks fourth for both incidence and mortality. The most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, however, substantially vary across countries and within each country depending on the degree of economic development and associated social and life style factors. It is noteworthy that high-quality cancer registry data, the basis for planning and implementing evidence-based cancer control programs, are not available in most low- and middle-income countries. The Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development is an international partnership that supports better estimation, as well as the collection and use of local data, to prioritize and evaluate national cancer control efforts. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018;0:1-31. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.

            Among the most promising approaches to activating therapeutic antitumour immunity is the blockade of immune checkpoints. Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways hardwired into the immune system that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues in order to minimize collateral tissue damage. It is now clear that tumours co-opt certain immune-checkpoint pathways as a major mechanism of immune resistance, particularly against T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Because many of the immune checkpoints are initiated by ligand-receptor interactions, they can be readily blocked by antibodies or modulated by recombinant forms of ligands or receptors. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies were the first of this class of immunotherapeutics to achieve US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Preliminary clinical findings with blockers of additional immune-checkpoint proteins, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), indicate broad and diverse opportunities to enhance antitumour immunity with the potential to produce durable clinical responses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

              In a phase 1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, showed efficacy in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma after the failure of conventional therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                30 March 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 658753
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University , Luzhou, China
                [2] 2 South Sichuan Institute of Translational Medicine , Luzhou, China
                [3] 3 Department of Pathophysiology, College of Basic Medical Science, Southwest Medical University , Luzhou, China
                [4] 4 Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital (T.C.M.) Affiliated to Southwest Medical University , Luzhou, China
                [5] 5 Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University , Luzhou, China
                [6] 6 Department of Oncology Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Luohu People’s Hospital , Shenzhen, China
                [7] 7 School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University , Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [8] 8 Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University , Luzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Peng Qu, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States

                Reviewed by: Guoyuan Zhu, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau; Menghua Wu, Jinan University, China

                *Correspondence: Tao Liu, tao2020@ 123456sohu.com ; Tao Yi, yitao@ 123456hkbu.edu.hk ; Zhangang Xiao, xzg555898@ 123456hotmail.com

                This article was submitted to Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2021.658753
                8042275
                33859650
                c1b9aa1d-fc7b-483e-a3c9-a6f060898229
                Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Jiang, Xiang, Kaboli, Shen, Zhao, Wu, Du, Li, Cho, Li, Wen, Liu, Yi and Xiao

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 January 2021
                : 02 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 103, Pages: 12, Words: 5723
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangdong Joint Fund 10.13039/501100014857
                Award ID: 81770562, 81503093, 81602166, 81672444
                Funded by: Southwest Medical University 10.13039/501100014895
                Award ID: 2016LZXNYD-T01, 2017LZXNYD-Z05, 2017LZXNYD-J09
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                immtac,immunosuppression,immunotherapy,t-cell receptors,suicide genes
                Immunology
                immtac, immunosuppression, immunotherapy, t-cell receptors, suicide genes

                Comments

                Comment on this article