26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Novel Wolbachia strains in Anopheles malaria vectors from Sub-Saharan Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:  Wolbachia, a common insect endosymbiotic bacterium that can influence pathogen transmission and manipulate host reproduction, has historically been considered absent from the  Anopheles (An.) genera, but has recently been found in  An. gambiae s.l. populations in West Africa.  As there are numerous  Anopheles species that have the capacity to transmit malaria, we analysed a range of species across five malaria endemic countries to determine  Wolbachia prevalence rates, characterise novel  Wolbachia strains and determine any correlation between the presence of  PlasmodiumWolbachia and the competing bacterium  Asaia.

          Methods:  Anopheles adult mosquitoes were collected from five malaria-endemic countries: Guinea, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Ghana, Uganda and Madagascar, between 2013 and 2017.  Molecular analysis was undertaken using quantitative PCR, Sanger sequencing,  Wolbachia multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and high-throughput amplicon sequencing of the bacterial  16S rRNA gene. 

          Results: Novel  Wolbachia strains were discovered in five species:  An. coluzziiAn. gambiae s.s.,  An. arabiensisAn. moucheti and  An. species A, increasing the number of  Anopheles species known to be naturally infected. Variable prevalence rates in different locations were observed and novel strains were phylogenetically diverse, clustering with  Wolbachia supergroup B strains.  We also provide evidence for resident strain variants within  An. species A.  Wolbachia is the dominant member of the microbiome in  An. moucheti and  An. species A but present at lower densities in  An. coluzzii.  Interestingly, no evidence of  Wolbachia/Asaia co-infections was seen and  Asaia infection densities were shown to be variable and location dependent. 

          Conclusions: The important discovery of novel  Wolbachia strains in  Anopheles provides greater insight into the prevalence of resident  Wolbachia strains in diverse malaria vectors.  Novel  Wolbachia strains (particularly high-density strains) are ideal candidate strains for transinfection to create stable infections in other  Anopheles mosquito species, which could be used for population replacement or suppression control strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets.

          We present the latest version of the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (Mega) software, which contains many sophisticated methods and tools for phylogenomics and phylomedicine. In this major upgrade, Mega has been optimized for use on 64-bit computing systems for analyzing larger datasets. Researchers can now explore and analyze tens of thousands of sequences in Mega The new version also provides an advanced wizard for building timetrees and includes a new functionality to automatically predict gene duplication events in gene family trees. The 64-bit Mega is made available in two interfaces: graphical and command line. The graphical user interface (GUI) is a native Microsoft Windows application that can also be used on Mac OS X. The command line Mega is available as native applications for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X. They are intended for use in high-throughput and scripted analysis. Both versions are available from www.megasoftware.net free of charge.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools

            SILVA (from Latin silva, forest, http://www.arb-silva.de) is a comprehensive web resource for up to date, quality-controlled databases of aligned ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences from the Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryota domains and supplementary online services. The referred database release 111 (July 2012) contains 3 194 778 small subunit and 288 717 large subunit rRNA gene sequences. Since the initial description of the project, substantial new features have been introduced, including advanced quality control procedures, an improved rRNA gene aligner, online tools for probe and primer evaluation and optimized browsing, searching and downloading on the website. Furthermore, the extensively curated SILVA taxonomy and the new non-redundant SILVA datasets provide an ideal reference for high-throughput classification of data from next-generation sequencing approaches.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies

              16S ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) amplicon analysis remains the standard approach for the cultivation-independent investigation of microbial diversity. The accuracy of these analyses depends strongly on the choice of primers. The overall coverage and phylum spectrum of 175 primers and 512 primer pairs were evaluated in silico with respect to the SILVA 16S/18S rDNA non-redundant reference dataset (SSURef 108 NR). Based on this evaluation a selection of ‘best available’ primer pairs for Bacteria and Archaea for three amplicon size classes (100–400, 400–1000, ≥1000 bp) is provided. The most promising bacterial primer pair (S-D-Bact-0341-b-S-17/S-D-Bact-0785-a-A-21), with an amplicon size of 464 bp, was experimentally evaluated by comparing the taxonomic distribution of the 16S rDNA amplicons with 16S rDNA fragments from directly sequenced metagenomes. The results of this study may be used as a guideline for selecting primer pairs with the best overall coverage and phylum spectrum for specific applications, therefore reducing the bias in PCR-based microbial diversity studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Supervision
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                27 November 2018
                2018
                : 3
                : 113
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
                [2 ]Entomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 30033, USA
                [3 ]Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA
                [4 ]Laboratoire d’entomologie médicale et parasitologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles (CRSN/LWIRO), Sud-Kivu, Congo, Democratic Republic
                [5 ]Unité d’Entomologie Médicale, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar
                [6 ]Nationale de Lutte contre le Paludisme, Ministere de la Sante, Conakry, Guinea
                [7 ]National Institute of Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, Congo, Democratic Republic
                [8 ]Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
                [9 ]Malaria Consortium, London, EC2A 4LT, UK
                [10 ]Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
                [11 ]The US President's Malaria Initiative and Entomology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 30329-4027, USA
                [12 ]Department of Pathology, Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, Center for Tropical Diseases, Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Disease, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
                [1 ]Microbiota of Insect Vectors Group, Institut Pasteur de la Guyane, Cayenne, French Guiana
                [2 ]Microbiota of Insect Vectors Group, Institut Pasteur de la Guyane,  Cayenne, French Guiana
                [3 ]Parasites and Vectors Department, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
                [1 ]Malaria Research Laboratory, Organisation for Coordination in the Fight Against Endemic Diseases in Central Africa, Yaoundé, Cameroon
                [1 ]Lund University, Lund, Sweden
                [1 ]Microbiota of Insect Vectors Group, Institut Pasteur de la Guyane,  Cayenne, French Guiana
                [2 ]Parasites and Vectors Department, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
                [3 ]Microbiota of Insect Vectors Group, Institut Pasteur de la Guyane, Cayenne, French Guiana
                London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-2808
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0363-8558
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-4698
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7442-8673
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8218-8614
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-6372
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-0038
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-523X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-6914
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-737X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-586X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7567-7185
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-012X
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14765.2
                6234743
                30483601
                c1bd6f78-951c-4392-9f02-463d784cd2a6
                Copyright: © 2018 Jeffries CL et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 November 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Department for International Development, UK Government
                Funded by: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                Award ID: U01CK000512
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R21AI129507
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01AI123074
                Award ID: R21AI124452
                Funded by: President’s Malaria Initiative
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 101285
                CLJ and TW were supported by a Wellcome Trust /Royal Society grant awarded to TW (101285): http://www.wellcome.ac.uk; https://royalsociety.org. GLH is supported by NIH grants (R21AI124452 and R21AI129507), a University of Texas Rising Star award, the John S. Dunn Foundation Collaborative Research Award, the Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Cooperative Agreement Number U01CK000512). The papers contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC or the Department of Health and Human Services. This work was also supported by a James W. McLaughlin postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Texas Medical Branch to SH. Field work in Uganda was funded by UK aid (through the Programme Partnership Arrangement grant to Malaria Consortium). YAA and ARM were supported by a NIH grant R01AI123074. SRI was funded by the U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative.
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                wolbachia,mosquitoes,malaria,anopheles,asaia,endosymbionts
                wolbachia, mosquitoes, malaria, anopheles, asaia, endosymbionts

                Comments

                Comment on this article