42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bibliometric Analysis of Parasitological Research in Iran and Turkey: A Comparative Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study was designed to assess and compare the quantity and quality of Iranian and Turkish researchers working in the field of Parasitology from bibliometric point of view.

          Methods

          To assess the contributions and achievements of the Iranian and Turkish parasitologists, bibliometric analysis was carried out based on the citation data retrieved from Web of Science.

          Results

          The absolute productivity of Turkish and Iranian parasitologists’ papers has almost tripled for Turkey, from 12 papers in 2002 to 36 papers in 2011, and decuple for Iran, from 10 papers to 123 from 2002 to 2010. The average number of citation per article is about 5.8 and 4 for Turkish and Iranian parasitologists’ papers, respectively. The “Veterinary Parasitology” journal was the most cited journal in both countries. The majority (more than 90%) of cited items was foreign journal articles and one half of all references in journals articles dated 11 and 12 years while one half of cited books was dated within 14 to16 years for Turkish and Iranian papers, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Based on observed data and applied model, it is anticipated that the total number of Iranian and Turkish parasitologists’ publications in Web of Science will exceed of 2512 and 240 articles per annum for Iranian and Turkish in 2020, respectively.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index

          The growth rate of scientific publication has been studied from 1907 to 2007 using available data from a number of literature databases, including Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Traditional scientific publishing, that is publication in peer-reviewed journals, is still increasing although there are big differences between fields. There are no indications that the growth rate has decreased in the last 50 years. At the same time publication using new channels, for example conference proceedings, open archives and home pages, is growing fast. The growth rate for SCI up to 2007 is smaller than for comparable databases. This means that SCI was covering a decreasing part of the traditional scientific literature. There are also clear indications that the coverage by SCI is especially low in some of the scientific areas with the highest growth rate, including computer science and engineering sciences. The role of conference proceedings, open access archives and publications published on the net is increasing, especially in scientific fields with high growth rates, but this has only partially been reflected in the databases. The new publication channels challenge the use of the big databases in measurements of scientific productivity or output and of the growth rate of science. Because of the declining coverage and this challenge it is problematic that SCI has been used and is used as the dominant source for science indicators based on publication and citation numbers. The limited data available for social sciences show that the growth rate in SSCI was remarkably low and indicate that the coverage by SSCI was declining over time. National Science Indicators from Thomson Reuters is based solely on SCI, SSCI and Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI). Therefore the declining coverage of the citation databases problematizes the use of this source.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Problems of citation analysis: A critical review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Impact Factor Game

              The PLoS Medicine editors argue that we need a better measure than the impact factor for assessing the biomedical literature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Iran J Parasitol
                Iran J Parasitol
                IJPA
                Iranian Journal of Parasitology
                Tehran University of Medical Sciences
                1735-7020
                2008-238X
                Apr-Jun 2013
                : 8
                : 2
                : 313-322
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Information Sciences, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
                [2 ]Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
                [3 ]Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author: Tel.: 00984412240658. Email: alirashidi@ 123456umsu.ac.ir
                Article
                IJPA-8-313
                3724158
                23914246
                c1d0b0e9-df0d-457c-938a-5009c7592495
                © 2013 Iranian Society of Parasitology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 October 2012
                : 14 February 2013
                Categories
                Original Article

                Parasitology
                bibliometric indicators,citation analysis,iran,turkey
                Parasitology
                bibliometric indicators, citation analysis, iran, turkey

                Comments

                Comment on this article