64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    8
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trial Watch : Immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) exert antineoplastic effects by eliciting a novel or reinstating a pre-existing antitumor immune response. Most often, immunostimulatory mAbs activate T lymphocytes or natural killer (NK) cells by inhibiting immunosuppressive receptors, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) or programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, best known as PD-1), or by engaging co-stimulatory receptors, like CD40, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 4 (TNFRSF4, best known as OX40) or TNFRSF18 (best known as GITR). The CTLA4-targeting mAb ipilimumab has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma in 2011. The therapeutic profile of ipilimumab other CTLA4-blocking mAbs, such as tremelimumab, is currently being assessed in subjects affected by a large panel of solid neoplasms. In the last few years, promising clinical results have also been obtained with nivolumab, a PD-1-targeting mAb formerly known as BMS-936558. Accordingly, the safety and efficacy of nivolumab and other PD-1-blocking molecules are being actively investigated. Finally, various clinical trials are underway to test the therapeutic potential of OX40- and GITR-activating mAbs. Here, we summarize recent findings on the therapeutic profile of immunostimulatory mAbs and discuss clinical trials that have been launched in the last 14 months to assess the therapeutic profile of these immunotherapeutic agents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references316

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Taking dendritic cells into medicine.

          Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate a repertoire of immune responses that bring about resistance to infection and silencing or tolerance to self. In the settings of infection and cancer, microbes and tumours can exploit DCs to evade immunity, but DCs also can generate resistance, a capacity that is readily enhanced with DC-targeted vaccines. During allergy, autoimmunity and transplant rejection, DCs instigate unwanted responses that cause disease, but, again, DCs can be harnessed to silence these conditions with novel therapies. Here we present some medical implications of DC biology that account for illness and provide opportunities for prevention and therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Decisions about dendritic cells: past, present, and future.

            A properly functioning adaptive immune system signifies the best features of life. It is diverse beyond compare, tolerant without fail, and capable of behaving appropriately with a myriad of infections and other challenges. Dendritic cells are required to explain how this remarkable system is energized and directed. I frame this article in terms of the major decisions that my colleagues and I have made in dendritic cell science and some of the guiding themes at the time the decisions were made. As a result of progress worldwide, there is now evidence of a central role for dendritic cells in initiating antigen-specific immunity and tolerance. The in vivo distribution and development of a previously unrecognized white cell lineage is better understood, as is the importance of dendritic cell maturation to link innate and adaptive immunity in response to many stimuli. Our current focus is on antigen uptake receptors on dendritic cells. These receptors enable experiments involving selective targeting of antigens in situ and new approaches to vaccine design in preclinical and clinical systems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Differential antigen processing by dendritic cell subsets in vivo.

              Dendritic cells (DCs) process and present self and foreign antigens to induce tolerance or immunity. In vitro models suggest that induction of immunity is controlled by regulating the presentation of antigen, but little is known about how DCs control antigen presentation in vivo. To examine antigen processing and presentation in vivo, we specifically targeted antigens to two major subsets of DCs by using chimeric monoclonal antibodies. Unlike CD8+ DCs that express the cell surface protein CD205, CD8- DCs, which are positive for the 33D1 antigen, are specialized for presentation on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II. This difference in antigen processing is intrinsic to the DC subsets and is associated with increased expression of proteins involved in MHC processing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Oncoimmunology
                Oncoimmunology
                ONCI
                Oncoimmunology
                Landes Bioscience
                2162-4011
                2162-402X
                01 January 2014
                01 February 2014
                01 February 2014
                : 3
                : 1
                : e27297
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Gustave Roussy; Villejuif, France
                [2 ]INSERM, U848; Villejuif, France
                [3 ]Equipe 11 labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers; Paris, France
                [4 ]Université Paris-Sud/Paris XI; Paris, France
                [5 ]Université Paris Descartes/Paris V ; Sorbonne Paris Cité; Paris, France
                [6 ]Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI; Paris, France
                [7 ]INSERM, U872; Paris, France
                [8 ]Equipe 15, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers; Paris, France
                [9 ]Equipe 13, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers; Paris, France
                [10 ]INSERM, U1015; CICBT507; Villejuif, France
                [11 ]Pôle de Biologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP; Paris, France
                [12 ]Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms; Gustave Roussy; Villejuif, France
                Author notes
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                [‡]

                These authors share senior co-authorship

                [* ]Correspondence to: Guido Kroemer, Email: kroemer@ 123456orange.fr and Lorenzo Galluzzi, Email: deadoc@ 123456vodafone.it
                Article
                2013ONCOIMM0332 27297
                10.4161/onci.27297
                3961485
                c1d8b0fa-c80a-4487-9b67-082eed51ce95
                Copyright © 2014 Landes Bioscience

                This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 November 2013
                : 21 November 2013
                Categories
                Author's View

                Immunology
                cd137,checkpoint blockade,immunogenic chemotherapy,immunosuppression,lirilumab,iph2101,pd-l1
                Immunology
                cd137, checkpoint blockade, immunogenic chemotherapy, immunosuppression, lirilumab, iph2101, pd-l1

                Comments

                Comment on this article