8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.2 Impact Factor I 6.4 CiteScore I 0.914 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Different Impacts of Preoperative Radiotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Stages II and III Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aims: The neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer has been changed from radiotherapy (RT) to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study is aimed at evaluating the benefit of CRT in patients with stage II or III lower rectal cancer, with regard to the impact on recurrence. Methods: A total of 474 patients with clinical stage II or III lower rectal cancer who received either preoperative RT ( n = 221) or CRT ( n = 253) followed by total mesorectal excision were identified from our institutional database. Propensity score analysis was performed to mitigate selection biases. Results: Among stage II patients, the CRT group showed a significantly lower 5-year local recurrence rate than the RT group (3.0 vs. 14.8%, p = 0.002). In contrast, among stage III patients, the CRT group showed a significantly lower 5-year distant recurrence rate than the RT group (27.8 vs. 42.6%, p = 0.04) and also a better 5-year recurrence-free survival (64.2 vs. 48.3%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Addition of concurrent chemotherapy to preoperative RT significantly enhanced the local control in stage II patients and decreased distant recurrence in stage III patients. The oncological benefit of CRT may differ between patients with stage II or III rectal cancer.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          DSU
          Dig Surg
          10.1159/issn.0253-4886
          Digestive Surgery
          S. Karger AG
          0253-4886
          1421-9883
          2018
          April 2018
          21 June 2017
          : 35
          : 3
          : 212-219
          Affiliations
          aDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, and bDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
          Author notes
          *Hirotoshi Takiyama, MD, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655 (Japan), E-Mail htakiyama-tky@umin.ac.jp
          Article
          477778 Dig Surg 2018;35:212–219
          10.1159/000477778
          28637039
          c20dc8bb-d913-4864-864e-cbca8ed18897
          © 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          : 21 October 2016
          : 24 May 2017
          Page count
          Figures: 6, Tables: 2, References: 20, Pages: 8
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
          Propensity score analysis,Rectal cancer,Preoperative chemoradiotherapy

          Comments

          Comment on this article