5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of drill-induced noise on hearing in non-operated ear

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drill-generated noise on hearing loss in non-operated ear and if any, was temporary or persistent.

          Materials and Methods:

          In this prospective clinical study, 23 patients who had undergone mastoidectomy and normal contralateral hearing were enrolled. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (1 and 7 days) following surgery using low and high-frequency pure tone audiometry (PTA) and low and high-frequency transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) testing.

          Results:

          Comparing preoperative and 1-day after surgery, PTA averages were significantly different at low frequencies, but no statistical significant differences were observed at 0.25 KHz and high-frequencies. Comparing 1-day after surgery and 7 days after surgery showed that, PTA averages at 0.5, 2 and 2 KHz were significantly different with no significant differences at the other average of thresholds in low and high frequencies; PTA average at 1 KHz was significantly different with, no significant differences at the other averages of thresholds in low and high frequencies. DPOAEs showed a significant difference preoperative and 1-day after surgery, 1-day and 7 days after, but DPOAEs were not significantly different. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) had a significant difference preoperative and 1-day after surgery, 1-day and 7 days after but when comparing preoperative and 7 days after surgery, TEOAEs were not significantly different.

          Conclusions:

          Drill-induced noise during ear surgery (mastoidectomy) can cause reversible changes in PTA, DPOAEs and TEOAEs in the non-operated ear.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Drill-generated sensorineural hearing loss following mastoid surgery.

          Drilling during mastoid surgery may result in temporary noise-induced hearing loss. This has practical implications for both the patient and surgeon. In a prospective study of 40 patients, audiometric testing was done both preoperatively and postoperatively to try to detect any significant hearing loss in the immediate postoperative period. The data were analyzed using the Student's paired t test. No statistically significant difference was found. A sensorineural hearing loss soon after mastoid surgery is not due to the noise generated by the drill. In the event of any hearing loss during this period, other causes should be sought.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sensorineural hearing loss following chronic ear surgery.

            The incidence and characteristics of postoperative sensorineural hearing loss were analyzed in 2,303 cases of chronic otitis and its sequelae, representing our total series from 1965 to 1980. Sensorineural hearing loss occurred in a total of 1.2% of cases: 0.5% became totally deaf, and 0.7% acquired a high tone loss, most often at 4 kHz only. The incidence was highest in congenital malformations, granulating otitis and cholesteatoma, mastoidectomy (especially canal-down), and during the period from 1965 to 1974. The most common causes of anacusis were removal of cholesteatoma from the semicircular canal and removal of the fistula membrane. Different types of severe high tone loss are described and, in addition, 19 patients with mild high tone loss are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Variables affecting the drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery.

              The manner in which the variables rotation speed, type of burr, burr size and site of drilling influence bone-conducted, drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery, has been investigated. From the results obtained, the following conclusions can be drawn. 1. The noise levels were primarily influenced by the size of the burr. The 6 mm cutting burrs gave a noise level of 88-108 dB, the use of a 4 mm one resulted in a reduction of 1-6 dB and the use of a 2 mm one, 5-16 dB. The mean noise levels of the diamond burrs were 5-11 dB lower than the mean noise levels of the cutting ones. 2. Variations in rotation speed had only a slight influence on the noise levels produced (0-5 dB). 3. Three different types of cutting burr were tested. All gave noise levels of about the same order of magnitude. 4. The noise levels around the cochlea were only slightly influenced by the localization of the drilling within the ear (less than 1.8 dB). 5. Drill-induced noise levels in ear surgery cannot be reduced to any great extent. Possible noise traumas to the inner ear can only be avoided by minimizing the duration of drilling and thus, the duration of harmful noise exposure to the cochlea.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Adv Biomed Res
                Adv Biomed Res
                ABR
                Advanced Biomedical Research
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                2277-9175
                2016
                11 May 2016
                : 5
                : 87
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                [1 ]Communication Disorders Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Alireza Fazel, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: fazel.alireza49@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                ABR-5-87
                10.4103/2277-9175.182218
                4879858
                27274502
                c2406048-792d-4b66-821f-2c187112c983
                Copyright: © 2016 Advanced Biomedical Research

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 08 November 2014
                : 27 January 2015
                Categories
                Original Article

                Molecular medicine
                distortion product otoacoustic emissions,drill-induced noise,hearing loss,mastoidectomy,pure tone audiometry,transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions

                Comments

                Comment on this article