72
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contribution of Large Pig for Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion and Transplantation Studies: The Preclinical Model

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Animal experimentation is necessary to characterize human diseases and design adequate therapeutic interventions. In renal transplantation research, the limited number of in vitro models involves a crucial role for in vivo models and particularly for the porcine model. Pig and human kidneys are anatomically similar (characterized by multilobular structure in contrast to rodent and dog kidneys unilobular). The human proximity of porcine physiology and immune systems provides a basic knowledge of graft recovery and inflammatory physiopathology through in vivo studies. In addition, pig large body size allows surgical procedures similar to humans, repeated collections of peripheral blood or renal biopsies making pigs ideal for medical training and for the assessment of preclinical technologies. However, its size is also its main drawback implying expensive housing. Nevertheless, pig models are relevant alternatives to primate models, offering promising perspectives with developments of transgenic modulation and marginal donor models facilitating data extrapolation to human conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references183

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research.

          Crucial prerequisites for the development of safe preclinical protocols in biomedical research are suitable animal models that would allow for human-related validation of valuable research information gathered from experimentation with lower mammals. In this sense, the miniature pig, sharing many physiological similarities with humans, offers several breeding and handling advantages (when compared to non-human primates), making it an optimal species for preclinical experimentation. The present review offers several examples taken from current research in the hope of convincing the reader that the porcine animal model has gained massively in importance in biomedical research during the last few years. The adduced examples are taken from the following fields of investigation: (a) the physiology of reproduction, where pig oocytes are being used to study chromosomal abnormalities (aneuploidy) in the adult human oocyte; (b) the generation of suitable organs for xenotransplantation using transgene expression in pig tissues; (c) the skin physiology and the treatment of skin defects using cell therapy-based approaches that take advantage of similarities between pig and human epidermis; and (d) neurotransplantation using porcine neural stem cells grafted into inbred miniature pigs as an alternative model to non-human primates xenografted with human cells.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review.

            Development of an optimal interface between bone and orthopaedic and dental implants has taken place for many years. In order to determine whether a newly developed implant material conforms to the requirements of biocompatibility, mechanical stability and safety, it must undergo rigorous testing both in vitro and in vivo. Results from in vitro studies can be difficult to extrapolate to the in vivo situation. For this reason the use of animal models is often an essential step in the testing of orthopaedic and dental implants prior to clinical use in humans. This review discusses some of the more commonly available and frequently used animal models such as the dog, sheep, goat, pig and rabbit models for the evaluation of bone-implant interactions. Factors for consideration when choosing an animal model and implant design are discussed. Various bone specific features are discussed including the usage of the species, bone macrostructure and microstructure and bone composition and remodelling, with emphasis being placed on the similarity between the animal model and the human clinical situation. While the rabbit was the most commonly used of the species discussed in this review, it is clear that this species showed the least similarities to human bone. There were only minor differences in bone composition between the various species and humans. The pig demonstrated a good likeness with human bone however difficulties may be encountered in relation to their size and ease of handling. In this respect the dog and sheep/goat show more promise as animal models for the testing of bone implant materials. While no species fulfils all of the requirements of an ideal model, an understanding of the differences in bone architecture and remodelling between the species is likely to assist in the selection of a suitable species for a defined research question.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The utility of the minipig as an animal model in regulatory toxicology.

              In this article we review the value and utility of the minipig as an animal model in regulatory toxicity testing. Our review is based on detailed consideration of the comparative biology of the minipig, and of the practical features of toxicity testing in the minipig. The minipig presents a favourable profile as a non-rodent toxicology model, in terms of the similarity to man and also in terms of applicability to different study types. Studies of general toxicology can be performed in the minipig by oral, cutaneous, parenteral and inhalation routes. For reproductive toxicology studies the minipig offers numerous advantages as a non-rodent model although the lack of placental transfer of macromolecules may limit the role of the minipig in reproductive testing of biotechnology products. For safety pharmacology studies the minipig is an advantageous model, particularly as regards the cardiovascular system. The immune system of the pig is better characterized than that of the dog, making the pig an interesting alternative model to the nonhuman primate for therapeutic approaches based on manipulation of the immune system. Overall, this review leads us to believe that the minipig might be a better non-rodent toxicology model than the dog. At the present time, however, insufficient comparative data is available to permit a rigorous evaluation of the predictivity of the minipig for human drug-induced toxicities and research is urgently needed to provide experimental data for evaluation of the hypothesis that minipig studies may better reflect human drug-induced toxicities than studies performed in traditional non-rodent toxicology models. It would be of particular value to gain a better vision of the potential utility of the minipig as a model for the safety testing of new biologics, where the minipig could potentially replace the use of non-human primates in the testing of some new products. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Biomed Biotechnol
                JBB
                Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                1110-7243
                1110-7251
                2011
                3 March 2011
                : 2011
                : 532127
                Affiliations
                1INSERM U927, BP 577, 86000 Poitiers Cedex, France
                2Service de Biochimie, CHU de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
                3IBISA, INRA, Domaine Expérimental du Magneraud, 17700 Surgères, France
                4Réseau FLIRT, Fédération pour l'Étude de l'Ischémie Reperfusion en Transplantation, 86000 Poitiers, France
                5Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
                6Service de Radiologie, CHU de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Lawrence Schook

                Article
                10.1155/2011/532127
                3051176
                21403881
                c2a27f37-4201-411c-945c-4d5ff118937e
                Copyright © 2011 S. Giraud et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 October 2010
                : 21 December 2010
                : 3 January 2011
                Categories
                Review Article

                Molecular medicine
                Molecular medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article