13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment

      , , ,
      Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d6342405e162">To not harm others is widely considered the most basic element of human morality. The aversion to harm others can be either rooted in the <i>outcomes</i> of an action (utilitarianism) or reactions to the <i>action</i> itself (deontology). We speculated that the human moral judgments rely on the <i>integration</i> of neural computations of harm and visceral reactions. The present research examined whether utilitarian or deontological aspects of moral judgment are associated with cardiac vagal tone, a physiological proxy for neuro-visceral integration. We investigated the relationship between cardiac vagal tone and moral judgment by using a mix of moral dilemmas, mathematical modeling and psychophysiological measures. An index of bipolar deontology-utilitarianism was correlated with resting heart rate variability (HRV)—an index of cardiac vagal tone—such that more utilitarian judgments were associated with lower HRV. Follow-up analyses using process dissociation, which independently quantifies utilitarian and deontological moral inclinations, provided further evidence that utilitarian (but not deontological) judgments were associated with lower HRV. Our results suggest that the functional integration of neural and visceral systems during moral judgments can restrict outcome-based, utilitarian moral preferences. Implications for theories of moral judgment are discussed. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.

          Is moral judgment accomplished by intuition or conscious reasoning? An answer demands a detailed account of the moral principles in question. We investigated three principles that guide moral judgments: (a) Harm caused by action is worse than harm caused by omission, (b) harm intended as the means to a goal is worse than harm foreseen as the side effect of a goal, and (c) harm involving physical contact with the victim is worse than harm involving no physical contact. Asking whether these principles are invoked to explain moral judgments, we found that subjects generally appealed to the first and third principles in their justifications, but not to the second. This finding has significance for methods and theories of moral psychology: The moral principles used in judgment must be directly compared with those articulated in justification, and doing so shows that some moral principles are available to conscious reasoning whereas others are not.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Orienting in a defensive world: mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A Polyvagal Theory.

            The vagus, the 10th cranial nerve, contains pathways that contribute to the regulation of the internal viscera, including the heart. Vagal efferent fibers do not originate in a common brainstem structure. The Polyvagal Theory is introduced to explain the different functions of the two primary medullary source nuclei of the vagus: the nucleus ambiguus (NA) and the dorsal motor nucleus (DMNX). Although vagal pathways from both nuclei terminate on the sinoatrial node, it is argued that the fibers originating in NA are uniquely responsible for respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Divergent shifts in RSA and heart rate are explained by independent actions of DMNX and NA. The theory emphasizes a phylogenetic perspective and speculates that mammalian, but not reptilian, brainstem organization is characterized by a ventral vagal complex (including NA) related to processes associated with attention, motion, emotion, and communication. Various clinical disorders, such as sudden infant death syndrome and asthma, may be related to the competition between DMNX and NA.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.

              Traditional theories of moral development emphasize the role of controlled cognition in mature moral judgment, while a more recent trend emphasizes intuitive and emotional processes. Here we test a dual-process theory synthesizing these perspectives. More specifically, our theory associates utilitarian moral judgment (approving of harmful actions that maximize good consequences) with controlled cognitive processes and associates non-utilitarian moral judgment with automatic emotional responses. Consistent with this theory, we find that a cognitive load manipulation selectively interferes with utilitarian judgment. This interference effect provides direct evidence for the influence of controlled cognitive processes in moral judgment, and utilitarian moral judgment more specifically.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
                Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1749-5016
                1749-5024
                September 28 2016
                October 2016
                October 2016
                June 17 2016
                : 11
                : 10
                : 1588-1596
                Article
                10.1093/scan/nsw077
                5040918
                27317926
                c2c0c0b0-d585-4a52-85bb-ba35429f7b3b
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article