7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      In vivo photoacoustic imaging of major blood vessels in the pancreas and liver during surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract.

          Abdominal surgeries carry considerable risk of gastrointestinal and intra-abdominal hemorrhage, which could possibly cause patient death. Photoacoustic imaging is one solution to overcome this challenge by providing visualization of major blood vessels during surgery. We investigate the feasibility of in vivo blood vessel visualization for photoacoustic-guided liver and pancreas surgeries. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of major blood vessels in these two abdominal organs was successfully achieved after a laparotomy was performed on two swine. Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging with a robot-controlled ultrasound (US) probe and color Doppler imaging were used to confirm vessel locations. Blood vessels in the in vivo liver were visualized with energies of 20 to 40 mJ, resulting in 10 to 15 dB vessel contrast. Similarly, an energy of 36 mJ was sufficient to visualize vessels in the pancreas with up to 17.3 dB contrast. We observed that photoacoustic signals were more focused when the light source encountered a major vessel in the liver. This observation can be used to distinguish major blood vessels in the image plane from the more diffuse signals associated with smaller blood vessels in the surrounding tissue. A postsurgery histopathological analysis was performed on resected pancreatic and liver tissues to explore possible laser-related damage. Results are generally promising for photoacoustic-guided abdominal surgery when the US probe is fixed and the light source is used to interrogate the surgical workspace. These findings are additionally applicable to other procedures that may benefit from photoacoustic-guided interventional imaging of the liver and pancreas (e.g., biopsy and guidance of radiofrequency ablation lesions in the liver).

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing.

          Swine are considered to be one of the major animal species used in translational research, surgical models, and procedural training and are increasingly being used as an alternative to the dog or monkey as the choice of nonrodent species in preclinical toxicologic testing of pharmaceuticals. There are unique advantages to the use of swine in this setting given that they share with humans similar anatomic and physiologic characteristics involving the cardiovascular, urinary, integumentary, and digestive systems. However, the investigator needs to be familiar with important anatomic, histopathologic, and clinicopathologic features of the laboratory pig and minipig in order to put background lesions or xenobiotically induced toxicologic changes in their proper perspective and also needs to consider specific anatomic differences when using the pig as a surgical model. Ethical considerations, as well as the existence of significant amounts of background data, from a regulatory perspective, provide further support for the use of this species in experimental or pharmaceutical research studies. It is likely that pigs and minipigs will become an increasingly important animal model for research and pharmaceutical development applications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Optical properties of normal and cancerous human skin in the visible and near-infrared spectral range.

            Differences in absorption and/or scattering of cancerous and normal skin have the potential to provide a basis for noninvasive cancer detection. In this study, we have determined and compared the in vitro optical properties of human epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous fat with those of nonmelanoma skin cancers in the spectral range from 370 to 1600 nm. Fresh specimens of normal and cancerous human skin were obtained from surgeries. The samples were rinsed in saline solution and sectioned. Diffuse reflectance and total transmittance were measured using an integrating sphere spectrophotometer. Absorption and reduced scattering coefficients were calculated from the measured quantities using an inverse Monte Carlo technique. The differences between optical properties of each normal tissue-cancer pair were statistically analyzed. The results indicate that there are significant differences in the scattering of cancerous and healthy tissues in the spectral range from 1050 to 1400 nm. In this spectral region, the scattering of cancerous lesions is consistently lower than that of normal tissues, whereas absorption does not differ significantly, with the exception of nodular basal cell carcinomas (BCC). Nodular BCCs exhibit significantly lower absorption as compared to normal skin. Therefore, the spectral range between 1050 and 1400 nm appears to be optimal for nonmelanoma skin cancer detection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Optical Constants of Silver, Gold, Copper, and Aluminum I The Absorption Coefficient k

              L. Schulz (1954)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Biomed Opt
                J Biomed Opt
                JBOPFO
                JBO
                Journal of Biomedical Optics
                Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
                1083-3668
                1560-2281
                13 August 2019
                December 2019
                13 August 2019
                : 24
                : 12
                : 121905
                Affiliations
                [a ]University of Delaware , Department of Biomedical Engineering, Newark, Delaware, United States
                [b ]Johns Hopkins University , Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
                [c ]Johns Hopkins University , Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
                [d ]Delta State University , Department of Biology, Cleveland, Mississippi, United States
                [e ]Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
                [f ]Johns Hopkins Medicine , Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
                [g ]Johns Hopkins Medicine , Department of Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
                [h ]Johns Hopkins Medicine , Department of Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
                [i ]Johns Hopkins University , Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Address all correspondence to Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell, E-mail: mledijubell@ 123456jhu.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-1872
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-4176
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3996-0327
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9149-2247
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-4482
                Article
                JBO-190094SSR 190094SSR
                10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121905
                7006046
                31411010
                c2e9a534-c941-4430-9c95-b3e4d15be7b6
                © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
                History
                : 31 March 2019
                : 22 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 2, References: 58, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001
                Award ID: 1751522
                Award ID: 1460674
                Categories
                Special Section Celebrating the Exponential Growth of Biomedical Optoacoustic/Photoacoustic Imaging
                Paper
                Custom metadata
                Kempski et al.: In vivo photoacoustic imaging of major blood vessels…

                Biomedical engineering
                photoacoustic-guided surgery,interventional imaging,liver surgery,pancreatic surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article