19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Parent–Child Positive Touch: Gender, Age, and Task Differences

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study examined gender, age, and task differences in positive touch and physical proximity during mother–child and father–child conversations. Sixty-five Spanish mothers and fathers and their 4- ( M = 53.50 months, SD = 3.54) and 6-year-old ( M = 77.07 months, SD = 3.94) children participated in this study. Positive touch was examined during a play-related storytelling task and a reminiscence task (conversation about past emotions). Fathers touched their children positively more frequently during the play-related storytelling task than did mothers. Both mothers and fathers were in closer proximity to their 6-year-olds than their 4-year-olds. Mothers and fathers touched their children positively more frequently when reminiscing than when playing. Finally, 6-year-olds remained closer to their parents than did 4-year-olds. Implications of these findings for future research on children’s socioemotional development are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Children's Time With Fathers in Intact Families

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: a review and synthesis of the empirical research.

            Although touch is one of the most neglected modalities of communication, several lines of research bear on the important communicative functions served by the modality. The authors highlighted the importance of touch by reviewing and synthesizing the literatures pertaining to the communicative functions served by touch among humans, nonhuman primates, and rats. In humans, the authors focused on the role that touch plays in emotional communication, attachment, bonding, compliance, power, intimacy, hedonics, and liking. In nonhuman primates, the authors examined the relations among touch and status, stress, reconciliation, sexual relations, and attachment. In rats, the authors focused on the role that touch plays in emotion, learning and memory, novelty seeking, stress, and attachment. The authors also highlighted the potential phylogenetic and ontogenetic continuities and discussed suggestions for future research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adult tactile stimulation during face-to-face interactions modulates five-month-olds' affect and attention.

              3 studies were designed to investigate infant responses to tactile stimulation during brief adult-infant interaction using a modified still-face (SF) procedure. When adults pose a neutral SF expression, infants decrease gazing and smiling at the adults, and some increase grimacing, relative to normal interaction periods. This SF effect was substantially reduced in Study 1 when mothers or strangers continued to touch infants during the SF period. In Studies 2 and 3, tactile versus visual and active versus passive aspects of adult touch were isolated during different SF periods. Visible, active adult hands unaccompanied by touch elicited infant attention, but not smiling, during the SF period. By contrast, active, not passive, adult touch substantially reduced the SF effect, even when the adult's hands were invisible. In the latter condition, infants continued to gaze and smile at the adult's SF. Thus, adult facial expressions are not the only modulator of infant affect and attention during social exchanges; adult touch appears to play an active role.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                a.aznar@surrey.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Nonverbal Behav
                J Nonverbal Behav
                Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
                Springer US (New York )
                0191-5886
                7 July 2016
                7 July 2016
                2016
                : 40
                : 4
                : 317-333
                Affiliations
                University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
                Article
                236
                10.1007/s10919-016-0236-x
                5075020
                27818561
                c2ed9b1c-2263-41b3-b2ba-b2af7f1c175a
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                parent,children,positive touch,nonverbal communication,gender differences

                Comments

                Comment on this article