For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
110
views
12
references
 Top references
cited by
6
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    1
    shares
      299
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Data Management Policies and Practices of Digital Archaeological Repositories

      Author(s): , , , , Salzburg Research Institute, Archaeology Data Service, Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries, Archaeology Data Service
      Publication date Created:
      Publication date (Electronic):
      Journal: Internet Archaeology
      Publisher: Council for British Archaeology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article presents the results of a survey of data management policies and practices of digital archaeological repositories in Europe and beyond. The survey was carried out in 2021 under the auspices of the European project ARIADNEplus and the COST Action SEADDA. Its main purpose was to collect and analyse information about current policies that determine access to and reuse of data held by digital archaeological repositories, and to investigate the guidance and support needed to make these repositories and data FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable).

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud

          Cameron Neylon, Barend Mons, Jan Velterop … (2017)
          The FAIR Data Principles propose that all scholarly output should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. As a set of guiding principles, expressing only the kinds of behaviours that researchers should expect from contemporary data resources, how the FAIR principles should manifest in reality was largely open to interpretation. As support for the Principles has spread, so has the breadth of these interpretations. In observing this creeping spread of interpretation, several of the original authors felt it was now appropriate to revisit the Principles, to clarify both what FAIRness is, and is not.
          Article 0 comments Cited 91 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The FAIR guiding principles for data stewardship: fair enough?

            Martin Boeckhout, Gerhard A Zielhuis, Annelien L. Bredenoord (2018)
            The FAIR guiding principles for research data stewardship (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) look set to become a cornerstone of research in the life sciences. A critical appraisal of these principles in light of ongoing discussions and developments about data sharing is in order. The FAIR principles point the way forward for facilitating data sharing more systematically—provided that a number of ethical, methodological, and organisational challenges are addressed as well.
            Article 0 comments Cited 59 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Evaluating FAIR maturity through a scalable, automated, community-governed framework

              Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, Susanna-Assunta Sansone … (2019)
              Transparent evaluations of FAIRness are increasingly required by a wide range of stakeholders, from scientists to publishers, funding agencies and policy makers. We propose a scalable, automatable framework to evaluate digital resources that encompasses measurable indicators, open source tools, and participation guidelines, which come together to accommodate domain relevant community-defined FAIR assessments. The components of the framework are: (1) Maturity Indicators – community-authored specifications that delimit a specific automatically-measurable FAIR behavior; (2) Compliance Tests – small Web apps that test digital resources against individual Maturity Indicators; and (3) the Evaluator, a Web application that registers, assembles, and applies community-relevant sets of Compliance Tests against a digital resource, and provides a detailed report about what a machine “sees” when it visits that resource. We discuss the technical and social considerations of FAIR assessments, and how this translates to our community-driven infrastructure. We then illustrate how the output of the Evaluator tool can serve as a roadmap to assist data stewards to incrementally and realistically improve the FAIRness of their resources.
              Article 0 comments Cited 49 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Guntram Geser: (View ORCID Profile)
                Julian D. Richards: (View ORCID Profile)
                Flavia Massara: (View ORCID Profile)
                Holly Wright: (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Title: Internet Archaeology
                Abbreviated Title: Internet Archaeol.
                Publisher: Council for British Archaeology
                ISSN (Electronic): 13635387
                Publication date Created: March 2022
                Publication date (Electronic): March 2022
                Issue: 59
                Article
                DOI: 10.11141/ia.59.2
                SO-VID: c30c55ce-0bc9-4252-b798-34c2c350f3a5
                Copyright © © 2022
                License:

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Pre-history,Early modern history,Archaeology,Anthropology,Ancient history,History
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Pre-history, Early modern history, Archaeology, Anthropology, Ancient history, History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content299

                See all similar

                Cited by6

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors122

                See all reference authors