4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Study protocol: developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies is associated with an increased risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity and represents a clinical dilemma. Interventions include expectant management with early preterm delivery if there are signs of fetal compromise, selective termination of the compromised twin, fetoscopic laser coagulation of the communicating placental vessels or termination of the whole pregnancy. Previous studies evaluating interventions have reported many different outcomes and outcome measures. Such variation makes comparing, contrasting, and combining results challenging, limiting ongoing research on this uncommon condition to inform clinical practice. We aim to produce, disseminate, and implement a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction research in monochorionic twin pregnancies.

          Methods

          An international steering group, including professionals, researchers, and lay experts, has been established to oversee the development of this core outcome set. The methods have been guided by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative Handbook.

          Potential core outcomes will be developed by undertaking a systematic review of studies evaluating interventions for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Potential core outcomes will be entered into a three-round Delphi survey and key stakeholders including clinical professionals, researchers, and lay experts will be invited to participate. Repeated reflection and rescoring of individual outcomes should encourage group and individual stakeholder convergence towards consensus outcomes which will be entered into a modified Nominal Group Technique to finalize the core outcome set. Once core outcomes have been agreed, we will establish standardized definitions and recommend high-quality measurement instruments for each outcome.

          Discussion

          The development, dissemination, and implementation of a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction should ensure that future research protocols select, collect, and report outcomes and outcome measures in a standardized manner. Data synthesis will be possible on a broad level and rigorous implementation should advance the quality of research studies and their effective use in order to guide clinical practice, improve patient care, maternal, short-term perinatal outcomes, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

          Trial registration

          Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) registration number: 998.

          International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42018092697. 18th April 2018.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3153-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks

            Background Addressing deficiencies in the dissemination and transfer of research-based knowledge into routine clinical practice is high on the policy agenda both in the UK and internationally. However, there is lack of clarity between funding agencies as to what represents dissemination. Moreover, the expectations and guidance provided to researchers vary from one agency to another. Against this background, we performed a systematic scoping to identify and describe any conceptual/organising frameworks that could be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activity. Methods We searched twelve electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO), the reference lists of included studies and of individual funding agency websites to identify potential studies for inclusion. To be included, papers had to present an explicit framework or plan either designed for use by researchers or that could be used to guide dissemination activity. Papers which mentioned dissemination (but did not provide any detail) in the context of a wider knowledge translation framework, were excluded. References were screened independently by at least two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by discussion. For each included paper, the source, the date of publication, a description of the main elements of the framework, and whether there was any implicit/explicit reference to theory were extracted. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results Thirty-three frameworks met our inclusion criteria, 20 of which were designed to be used by researchers to guide their dissemination activities. Twenty-eight included frameworks were underpinned at least in part by one or more of three different theoretical approaches, namely persuasive communication, diffusion of innovations theory, and social marketing. Conclusions There are currently a number of theoretically-informed frameworks available to researchers that can be used to help guide their dissemination planning and activity. Given the current emphasis on enhancing the uptake of knowledge about the effects of interventions into routine practice, funders could consider encouraging researchers to adopt a theoretically-informed approach to their research dissemination.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Developing, implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine

              Background In high resource settings, 1 in 10 newborn babies require admission to a neonatal unit. Research evaluating neonatal care involves recording and reporting many different outcomes and outcome measures. Such variation limits the usefulness of research as studies cannot be compared or combined. To address these limitations, we aim to develop, disseminate and implement a core outcome set for neonatal medicine. Methods A steering group that includes parents and former patients, healthcare professionals and researchers has been formed to guide the development of the core outcome set. We will review neonatal trials systematically to identify previously reported outcomes. Additionally, we will specifically identify outcomes of importance to parents, former patients and healthcare professionals through a systematic review of qualitative studies. Outcomes identified will be entered into an international, multi-perspective eDelphi survey. All key stakeholders will be invited to participate. The Delphi method will encourage individual and group stakeholder consensus to identify a core outcome set. The core outcome set will be mapped to existing, routinely recorded data where these exist. Discussion Use of a core set will ensure outcomes of importance to key stakeholders, including former patients and parents, are recorded and reported in a standard fashion in future research. Embedding the core outcome set within future clinical studies will extend the usefulness of research to inform practice, enhance patient care and ultimately improve outcomes. Using routinely recorded electronic data will facilitate implementation with minimal addition burden. Trial registration number Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database: 842 (www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/842).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                akhalil@sgul.ac.uk
                james.duffy@balliol.ox.ac.uk
                helen.perry6@nhs.net
                j.w.ganzevoort@amc.uva.nl
                keithreed@tamba.org.uk
                abascha1@jhmi.edu
                jan.deprest@uzleuven.be
                gratacos@clinic.ub.es
                khecher@uke.de
                liesbeth.lewi@uzleuven.be
                e.lopriore@lumc.nl
                d.oepkes@lumc.nl
                apapageo@sgul.ac.uk
                s.j.gordijn@lumc.nl
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                9 January 2019
                9 January 2019
                2019
                : 20
                : 35
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8546 682X, GRID grid.264200.2, Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, , St George’s University of London, ; Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.451349.e, Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, , St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0QT UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, GRID grid.4991.5, Balliol College, , University of Oxford, ; Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BJ UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, GRID grid.4991.5, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, , University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, ; Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000084992262, GRID grid.7177.6, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, , University of Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Twin and Multiple Births Association (TAMBA), The Manor House Manor Park, Church Hill, Aldershot, GU12 4JU UK
                [7 ]The Johns Hopkins Center for Fetal Therapy, 600 North Wolfe, Nelson 228, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0626 3338, GRID grid.410569.f, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, , University Hospitals of KU Leuven, ; Herestraat, 49 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0247, GRID grid.5841.8, Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, , Universitat de Barcelona; Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), and Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), ; Barcelona, Spain
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2180 3484, GRID grid.13648.38, Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, , University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, ; Neues Klinikum, Gebäude O10 Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
                [11 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, , Leiden University Medical Center, ; K-06-35, P.O. Box 9600, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands
                [12 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-7670
                Article
                3153
                10.1186/s13063-018-3153-y
                6327411
                30626413
                c30ec4f4-41be-48fe-9f0b-a1bd1a68aee9
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 July 2018
                : 18 December 2018
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Medicine
                selective fetal growth restriction,selective intrauterine growth restriction,core outcome set,modified delphi method,modified nominal group technique,consensus development study

                Comments

                Comment on this article