12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Western scrub-jays ( Aphelocoma californica) solve multiple-string problems by the spatial relation of string and reward

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          String-pulling is a widely used paradigm in animal cognition research to assess what animals understand about the functionality of strings as a means to obtain an out-of-reach reward. This study aimed to systematically investigate what rules Western scrub-jays ( Aphelocoma californica) use to solve different patterned string tasks, i.e. tasks in which subjects have to choose between two or more strings of which only one is connected to the reward, or where one is more efficient. Arranging strings in a parallel configuration showed that the jays were generally capable of solving multiple-string tasks and acted in a goal-directed manner. The slanted and crossed configurations revealed a reliance on a “proximity rule”, that is, a tendency to choose the string-end closest to the reward. When confronted with strings of different lengths attached to rewards at different distances the birds chose according to the reward distance, preferring the reward closest to them, and were sensitive to the movement of the reward, but did not consistently prefer the shorter and therefore more efficient string. Generally, the scrub-jays were successful in tasks where the reward was closest to the string-ends they needed to pull or when string length and reward distance correlated, but the birds had problems when the wrong string-end was closest to the reward or when the food items were in close proximity to each other. These results show that scrub-jays had a partial understanding of the physical principles underlying string-pulling but relied on simpler strategies such as the proximity rule to solve the tasks.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1018-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes.

          Discussions of the evolution of intelligence have focused on monkeys and apes because of their close evolutionary relationship to humans. Other large-brained social animals, such as corvids, also understand their physical and social worlds. Here we review recent studies of tool manufacture, mental time travel, and social cognition in corvids, and suggest that complex cognition depends on a "tool kit" consisting of causal reasoning, flexibility, imagination, and prospection. Because corvids and apes share these cognitive tools, we argue that complex cognitive abilities evolved multiple times in distantly related species with vastly different brain structures in order to solve similar socioecological problems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              TOOLS AND BRAINS IN BIRDS

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44 (0)1223 3 33559 , nsc22@cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Anim Cogn
                Anim Cogn
                Animal Cognition
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1435-9448
                1435-9456
                28 July 2016
                28 July 2016
                2016
                : 19
                : 6
                : 1103-1114
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Site, Cambridge, CB2 3EB UK
                [2 ]Department of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2082-7788
                Article
                1018
                10.1007/s10071-016-1018-x
                5054065
                27470204
                c31067bb-d5de-487f-8c62-f7550ce06f8c
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 26 February 2016
                : 11 June 2016
                : 19 July 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council;
                Funded by: Cambridge Home and EU Scholarship Scheme
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004350, Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes;
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

                Animal science & Zoology
                string-pulling,physical cognition,corvids,problem-solving,causal reasoning

                Comments

                Comment on this article