16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Response by Cohen et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Association of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19”

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In Response: We read with great interest the original investigation by Zhang et al 1 and the accompanying editorial by Shah et al. 2 The study question is urgent and important, given the potential relationships among ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor or ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker) use, ACE2 expression/activity, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity. 3–5 We appreciate that the authors appropriately tempered their interpretation of the results based on several limitations noted in their publication and the accompanying editorial. Nonetheless, we are concerned that many readers may still overinterpret the impressive hazard ratios. Notably, exposure assignments were based only on antihypertensive medications administered at any point during hospitalization. Patients had to survive long enough, or be clinically stable enough, to achieve the exposure (ie, ACE inhibitors/ARB use). This time-dependent bias (or immortal time bias) underestimates the hazard of the exposure group, 6 which may result in a false or exaggerated apparent protective effect of ACE inhibitors/ARBs. Also, fewer patients were on ACE inhibitors/ARBs than expected (17% versus 30%–40% prevalent use 7,8 ), suggesting substantial unmeasured confounding and nonsystematic exposure ascertainment: sicker patients will almost invariably be less likely to receive ACE inhibitors/ARBs during hospitalization. These limitations may explain contradictory results in observational US veteran data which did not show an association between baseline ACE inhibitors/ARB use and need for intensive care in patients with COVID-19 (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.30–2.90] and adjusted odds ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 0.94–2.93]). 9 Based on several clinical and mechanistic considerations, we believe that there is equipoise regarding potential benefit or harm from ACE inhibitors/ARB use in patients at risk for or who have COVID-19. 3,4 The current study reinforces the urgent need for randomized controlled trial evidence to address this important issue. 2 We are currently conducting an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (REPLACE COVID trial [The Randomized Elimination or Prolongation of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Coronavirus Disease 2019], URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04338009) randomizing patients on chronic ACE inhibitors/ARBs who are hospitalized with COVID-19 to continuation versus withdrawal of their ACE inhibitors/ARB upon admission, evaluating a hierarchical outcome including death, mechanical ventilation, pressor requirement, and other markers of severity of critical illness. Another ongoing trial in Ireland (URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04330300) is randomizing outpatients with hypertension to continuation versus withdrawal of ACE inhibitors/ARBs, evaluating the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality. Sources of Funding This study was supported by National Institutes of Health: K23-HL133843 (J.B. Cohen), T32-HL007891 (T.C. Hanff), R01-HL146818 (A.M. South), UC4DK108173 (A.M. South), R01-HL133468 (A.P. Bress), R01-HL 121510-01A1 (J.A. Chirinos), R61-HL-146390 (J.A. Chirinos), R01-AG058969 (J.A. Chirinos), 1R01-HL104106 (J.A. Chirinos), P01-HL094307 (J.A. Chirinos), R03-HL146874-01 (J.A. Chirinos), and R56-HL136730 (J.A. Chirinos), K23HL128909 (J.B. Byrd). FastGrants (J.B. Byrd), University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center (J.B. Byrd), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa (S. Hiremath). Disclosures J.A. Chirinos has received honoraria from Sanifit, Microsoft, Fukuda-Denshi, Bristol Myers Squibb, OPKO Healthcare, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Akros Pharma, Merck, Edwards Lifesciences, Bayer and Johnson & Johnson and research grants from Microsoft, Fukuda-Denshi and Bristol Myers Squibb. The other authors report no conflicts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Association of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            COVID-19, ACE2, and the cardiovascular consequences

            The novel SARS coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may be particularly deleterious to patients with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD). The mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 infection is the requisite binding of the virus to the membrane-bound form of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and internalization of the complex by the host cell. Recognition that ACE2 is the coreceptor for the coronavirus has prompted new therapeutic approaches to block the enzyme or reduce its expression to prevent the cellular entry and SARS-CoV-2 infection in tissues that express ACE2 including lung, heart, kidney, brain, and gut. ACE2, however, is a key enzymatic component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS); ACE2 degrades ANG II, a peptide with multiple actions that promote CVD, and generates Ang-(1–7), which antagonizes the effects of ANG II. Moreover, experimental evidence suggests that RAAS blockade by ACE inhibitors, ANG II type 1 receptor antagonists, and mineralocorticoid antagonists, as well as statins, enhance ACE2 which, in part, contributes to the benefit of these regimens. In lieu of the fact that many older patients with hypertension or other CVDs are routinely treated with RAAS blockers and statins, new clinical concerns have developed regarding whether these patients are at greater risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, whether RAAS and statin therapy should be discontinued, and the potential consequences of RAAS blockade to COVID-19-related pathologies such as acute and chronic respiratory disease. The current perspective critically examines the evidence for ACE2 regulation by RAAS blockade and statins, the cardiovascular benefits of ACE2, and whether ACE2 blockade is a viable approach to attenuate COVID-19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sound Science before Quick Judgement Regarding RAS Blockade in COVID-19

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circ Res
                Circ. Res
                RES
                Circulation Research
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0009-7330
                1524-4571
                05 June 2020
                17 April 2020
                : 126
                : 12
                : e140-e141
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division (J.B.C.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [2 ]Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (J.B.C., T.C.H.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
                [3 ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (T.C.H., J.A.C.)
                [4 ]Section of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Brenner Children’s Hospital, Winston-Salem, NC (A.M.S.)
                [5 ]Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, and Department of Surgery-Hypertension and Vascular Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (A.M.S.)
                [6 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.A.S.)
                [7 ]Renal Section, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, NC (M.A.S.)
                [8 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada (S.H.)
                [9 ]Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (A.P.B.)
                [10 ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (J.B.B.).
                Article
                00018
                10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317205
                7265880
                c314d119-f122-422a-a476-6edb8e7caf4a
                © 2020 American Heart Association, Inc.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                Categories
                Letters to the Editor
                Custom metadata
                ONLINE-ONLY

                Comments

                Comment on this article