321
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring acoustic habitats

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1. Many organisms depend on sound for communication, predator/prey detection and navigation. The acoustic environment can therefore play an important role in ecosystem dynamics and evolution. A growing number of studies are documenting acoustic habitats and their influences on animal development, behaviour, physiology and spatial ecology, which has led to increasing demand for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) expertise in the life sciences. However, as yet, there has been no synthesis of data processing methods for acoustic habitat monitoring, which presents an unnecessary obstacle to would-be PAM analysts.

          2. Here, we review the signal processing techniques needed to produce calibrated measurements of terrestrial and aquatic acoustic habitats. We include a supplemental tutorial and template computer codes in matlab and r, which give detailed guidance on how to produce calibrated spectrograms and statistical analyses of sound levels. Key metrics and terminology for the characterisation of biotic, abiotic and anthropogenic sound are covered, and their application to relevant monitoring scenarios is illustrated through example data sets. To inform study design and hardware selection, we also include an up-to-date overview of terrestrial and aquatic PAM instruments.

          3. Monitoring of acoustic habitats at large spatiotemporal scales is becoming possible through recent advances in PAM technology. This will enhance our understanding of the role of sound in the spatial ecology of acoustically sensitive species and inform spatial planning to mitigate the rising influence of anthropogenic noise in these ecosystems. As we demonstrate in this work, progress in these areas will depend upon the application of consistent and appropriate PAM methodologies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms.

            Growth in transportation networks, resource extraction, motorized recreation and urban development is responsible for chronic noise exposure in most terrestrial areas, including remote wilderness sites. Increased noise levels reduce the distance and area over which acoustic signals can be perceived by animals. Here, we review a broad range of findings that indicate the potential severity of this threat to diverse taxa, and recent studies that document substantial changes in foraging and anti-predator behavior, reproductive success, density and community structure in response to noise. Effective management of protected areas must include noise assessment, and research is needed to further quantify the ecological consequences of chronic noise exposure in terrestrial environments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Handling Editor
                Journal
                Methods Ecol Evol
                Methods Ecol Evol
                mee3
                Methods in Ecology and Evolution
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                2041-210X
                2041-210X
                March 2015
                27 January 2015
                : 6
                : 3
                : 257-265
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK
                [2 ]Department of Biology, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA
                [3 ]Department of Physics, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
                [4 ]Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division, National Park Service Fort Collins, CO, 80525, USA
                [5 ]Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK
                [6 ]Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK
                Author notes
                *Correspondence author. E-mail: nathan.merchant@ 123456cefas.co.uk
                Article
                10.1111/2041-210X.12330
                4413749
                25954500
                c31a8c3c-0072-4399-a8de-b0dc599eedda
                © 2015 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 September 2014
                : 08 December 2014
                Categories
                Reviews

                acoustic ecology,ambient noise,anthropogenic noise,bioacoustics,ecoacoustics,habitat monitoring,passive acoustic monitoring,remote sensing,soundscape

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content194

                Cited by132

                Most referenced authors411