22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lessons learned from engaging communities for Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone: reciprocity, relatability, relationships and respect (the four R’s)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Building trust and engaging the community are important for biomedical trials. This was core to the set up and delivery of the EBOVAC-Salone and PREVAC Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone during and following the 2014–2016 West African Ebola epidemic. Local community liaison teams (CLT) engaged with the community through public meetings, radio chat shows, and other activities, while a social science team (SST) assessed community members’ and participants’ perceptions and regularly updated the clinical team to adapt procedures to improve the acceptability and compliance of the trial. The objective of this study was to examine the community engagement (CE) program in these trials and to identify potential barriers and facilitators.

          Methods

          Fifteen CLT and SST members participated in in-depth interviews and 23 community members attended three focus groups to discuss the Ebola vaccine trials and their experiences and perspectives of the CE activities.

          Results

          A key aim of the CE program was to build trust between the community and the trial. Four main principles (the “four R’s”) evolved from the discussions with team members and the community that influenced this trust: reciprocity, relatability, relationships and respect. The CLT and SST ensured reciprocal communication between the trial team and the community. The CLT delivered key messages from the trial, whilst the SST completed ethnographic research in the field to uncover rumors and perceptions of the trial in the community. These ethnographic findings were shared with the CLT and addressed in targeted messaging to the community. Both the CLT and SST approached the communities in an egalitarian manner, by dressing modestly, speaking local dialects, and using relatable examples. Appreciation and understanding of the importance of interpersonal relationships and respect for the people, their customs, and traditions also played a large role in the CE program.

          Conclusion

          These findings provide an in-depth understanding of how interdisciplinary community liaison and social science teams can work with a clinical team to strengthen trust. The four R’s suggest the ways in which trust relations are central to CE and confidence in vaccine trials, and could offer an approach to CE in vaccine trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries

          The authors argue that there have been few systematic attempts to determine the effectiveness of community engagement in research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review.

            Community engagement in research may enhance a community's ability to address its own health needs and health disparities issues while ensuring that researchers understand community priorities. However, there are researchers with limited understanding of and experience with effective methods of engaging communities. Furthermore, limited guidance is available for peer-review panels on evaluating proposals for research that engages communities. The National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives developed a community engagement framework that includes values, strategies to operationalize each value, and potential outcomes of their use, as well as a peer-review framework for evaluating research that engages communities. Use of these frameworks for educating researchers to create and sustain authentic community-academic partnerships will increase accountability and equality between the partners.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research.

              New technologies for global public health are spurring critical evaluations of the role of communities in research and what they receive in exchange for their participation. Community engagement activities resulting from these evaluations are most challenging for novel scientific ventures, particularly those involving controversial strategies and those in which some risks are poorly understood or determined. Remarkably, there is no explicit body of community engagement knowledge to which researchers can turn for guidance about approaches that are most likely to be effective in different contexts, and why. We describe here a framework that provides a starting point for broader discussions of community engagement in global health research, particularly as it relates to the development, evaluation and application of new technologies. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sara.dada1@lshtm.ac.uk
                gillian.mckay@lshtm.ac.uk
                amateus@rvc.ac.uk
                shelley.lees@lshtm.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                11 December 2019
                11 December 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 1665
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, GRID grid.8991.9, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, ; Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0425 573X, GRID grid.20931.39, The Royal Veterinary College, ; Royal College Street, London, NW1 0TU UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-1856
                Article
                7978
                10.1186/s12889-019-7978-4
                6907283
                31829223
                c31cac02-ffbc-430b-9d8b-877ae1da3d7a
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 2 July 2019
                : 20 November 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Public health
                community engagement,vaccine trials,ebola,sierra leone,disease preparedness
                Public health
                community engagement, vaccine trials, ebola, sierra leone, disease preparedness

                Comments

                Comment on this article