31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Risk for Mania and its Relationship to Implicit and Explicit Achievement Motivation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is evidence that bipolar disorders are associated with achievement-related cognitions such as setting high goals. A psychodynamic model, the manic defense hypothesis, postulates that a threat to fragile self-esteem triggers grandiosity and manic behaviors in vulnerable people. Vulnerability to bipolar disorders should therefore be positively associated with indicators of explicit hope of success (HS) and implicit fear of failure (FF). Using an online sample ( n = 252), we tested these hypotheses using the well-validated Hypomanic Personality Scale as risk indicator for mania, the Multi-Motive Grid for achievement motivation, controlling for current and lifetime depression. Contrary to expectations, we found that vulnerability for mania was significantly and positively related to implicit HS but not to FF after controlling for depression. All measures were self-report tools. Our results contradict the Manic Defense Hypothesis, but they are in line with the idea that achievement-related cognitions are of relevance to vulnerability in bipolar disorders. This is in line with research focusing on the role of the Behavioral Activation System in relation to vulnerability for mania.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG).

              In this article, we introduce the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG), a new diagnostic tool to measure motives with respect to their hope and fear components. The MMG combines features of the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) with features of self-report questionnaires. Similar to the TAT, a set of 14 pictures representing a balanced set of achievement-arousing, affiliation-arousing, and power-arousing situations is presented together with a set of statements representing important motivational states. Six motive scores can be calculated: hope of success (HS) and fear of failure (FF) for the achievement motive, hope of affiliation (HA) and fear of rejection (FR) for the affiliation motive, and hope of power (HP) and fear of power (FP) for the power motive. Results of factor analyses suggest a 3-factor solution, with a general fear factor (FF, FR, FP), a factor combining the hope components of achievement and power (HS and HP), and a third factor representing HA, but the 6 a priori factors also reflect a sound structural model. Reliability data show that the internal consistency and retest reliability of the MMG scales satisfy traditional standards. External validity of the MMG has been established in all 3 motive domains. Three separate studies document that (a) individuals high in resultant achievement motivation perform better and report more flow experience, (b) individuals high in resultant power motivation profit more from a leadership training program, and (c) individuals high in resultant affiliation motivation recollect more highly memorable affiliative themes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jid
                Journal of Individual Differences
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1614-0001
                2151-2299
                November 25, 2013
                2013
                : 34
                : 4
                : 214-221
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Psychology and Health, Community Health Newham, London, UK
                [ 2 ] Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
                Author notes
                Thomas D. Meyer, Institute of Neuroscience/Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, Ridley Bldg., Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK, +44 191 222-8967 thomas.meyer@ 123456newcastle.ac.uk
                Article
                jid_34_4_214
                10.1027/1614-0001/a000117
                c3474578-80cd-4548-8428-1438d86c35a8
                Copyright @ 2013
                History
                : August 29, 2013
                Categories
                Original Article

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General behavioral science
                achievement motivation,vulnerability,bipolar disorders,implicit motives,cognitive theory

                Comments

                Comment on this article