5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Outcomes of Patients with Nelson’s Syndrome after Primary Treatment: A Multicenter Study from 13 UK Pituitary Centers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Long-term outcomes of patients with Nelson’s syndrome (NS) have been poorly explored, especially in the modern era.

          Objective

          To elucidate tumor control rates, effectiveness of various treatments, and markers of prognostic relevance in patients with NS.

          Patients, design, and setting

          Retrospective cohort study of 68 patients from 13 UK pituitary centers with median imaging follow-up of 13 years (range 1–45) since NS diagnosis.

          Results

          Management of Cushing’s disease (CD) prior to NS diagnosis included surgery+adrenalectomy (n = 30; eight patients had 2 and one had 3 pituitary operations), surgery+radiotherapy+adrenalectomy (n = 17; two received >1 courses of irradiation, two had ≥2 pituitary surgeries), radiotherapy+adrenalectomy (n = 2), and adrenalectomy (n = 19). Primary management of NS mainly included surgery, radiotherapy, surgery+radiotherapy, and observation; 10-year tumor progression-free survival was 62% (surgery 80%, radiotherapy 52%, surgery+radiotherapy 81%, observation 51%). Sex, age at CD or NS diagnosis, size of adenoma (micro-/macroadenoma) at CD diagnosis, presence of pituitary tumor on imaging prior adrenalectomy, and mode of NS primary management were not predictors of tumor progression. Mode of management of CD before NS diagnosis was a significant factor predicting progression, with the group treated by surgery+radiotherapy+adrenalectomy for their CD showing the highest risk (hazard ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–13.5). During follow-up, 3% of patients had malignant transformation with spinal metastases and 4% died of aggressively enlarging tumor.

          Conclusions

          At 10 years follow-up, 38% of the patients diagnosed with NS showed progression of their corticotroph tumor. Complexity of treatments for the CD prior to NS diagnosis, possibly reflecting corticotroph adenoma aggressiveness, predicts long-term tumor prognosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Treatment of Cushing's Disease.

          Cushing's disease (CD), or pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome, is a severe endocrine disease caused by a corticotroph pituitary tumor and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The first-line treatment for CD is pituitary surgery, which is followed by disease remission in around 78% and relapse in around 13% of patients during the 10-year period after surgery, so that nearly one third of patients experience in the long-term a failure of surgery and require an additional second-line treatment. Patients with persistent or recurrent CD require additional treatments, including pituitary radiotherapy, adrenal surgery, and/or medical therapy. Pituitary radiotherapy is effective in controlling cortisol excess in a large percentage of patients, but it is associated with a considerable risk of hypopituitarism. Adrenal surgery is followed by a rapid and definitive control of cortisol excess in nearly all patients, but it induces adrenal insufficiency. Medical therapy has recently acquired a more important role compared to the past, due to the recent employment of novel compounds able to control cortisol secretion or action. Currently, medical therapy is used as a presurgical treatment, particularly for severe disease; or as postsurgical treatment, in cases of failure or incomplete surgical tumor resection; or as bridging therapy before, during, and after radiotherapy while waiting for disease control; or, in selected cases, as primary therapy, mainly when surgery is not an option. The adrenal-directed drug ketoconazole is the most commonly used drug, mainly because of its rapid action, whereas the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, mifepristone, is highly effective in controlling clinical comorbidities, mainly glucose intolerance, thus being a useful treatment for CD when it is associated with diabetes mellitus. Pituitary-directed drugs have the advantage of acting at the site responsible for CD, the pituitary tumor. Among this group of drugs, the dopamine agonist cabergoline and the somatostatin analog pasireotide result in disease remission in a consistent subgroup of patients with CD. Recently, pasireotide has been approved for the treatment of CD when surgery has failed or when surgery is not an option, and mifepristone has been approved for the treatment of Cushing's syndrome when associated with impairment of glucose metabolism in case of the lack of a surgical indication. Recent experience suggests that the combination of different drugs may be able to control cortisol excess in a great majority of patients with CD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas

            Pituitary tumours are common and easily treated by surgery or medical treatment in most cases. However, a small subset of pituitary tumours does not respond to standard medical treatment and presents with multiple local recurrences (aggressive pituitary tumours) and in rare occasion with metastases (pituitary carcinoma). The present European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) guideline aims to provide clinical guidance on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Morbidity and mortality in Cushing's disease: an epidemiological approach.

              Although Cushing's disease is a well documented clinical entity, there is no epidemiological information about it. The present study tries to obtain this information. Forty-nine patients affected by Cushing's disease living in Vizcaya (Spain) between 1975 and 1992 were considered for an epidemiological study. The prevalence of known cases at the end of 1992 was 39.1 per million inhabitants. The average incidence of newly diagnosed cases was 2.4 cases per million people per year. Cushing's disease was more frequent in women (n = 46) than in men (n = 3), with a ratio of 15:1. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension were observed in 38.7 and 55.1% of patients, respectively. Remission of Cushing's disease was achieved in 36 out of 41 patients (87.5%). In general, the mortality was higher than that expected for the control population (standardized mortality ratio, SMR 3.8, 95% confidence interval, CI 2.5-17.9, P < 0.03). Concerning the cause of death, the SMR of vascular disease was 5 (95% CI 3.4-48.6, P < 0.05). Higher age, persistence of hypertension and abnormalities of glucose metabolism after treatment, were independent predictors of mortality (multivariate analyses, P < 0.01). Prevalence of Cushing's disease was 39.1 cases/million inhabitants and average incidence was 2.4 cases/million per year. Mortality was elevated, due to vascular disease, associated with higher age, persistence of hypertension and impaired glucose metabolism.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
                The Endocrine Society
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                May 2020
                May 01 2020
                May 2020
                May 01 2020
                November 18 2019
                : 105
                : 5
                : 1527-1537
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
                [2 ]Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
                [3 ]Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
                [4 ]Department of Endocrinology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
                [5 ]Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                [6 ]NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
                [7 ]Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
                [8 ]Department of Endocrinology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
                [9 ]Department of Endocrinology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
                [10 ]Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
                [11 ]Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [12 ]Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
                [13 ]Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
                [14 ]Department of Endocrinology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
                [15 ]Department of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
                [16 ]University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
                [17 ]Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [18 ]Department of Endocrinology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
                Article
                10.1210/clinem/dgz200
                c356839d-0540-41c6-b265-5ffd6e5d3c13
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article