11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “Two Minds Don’t Blink Alike”: The Attentional Blink Does Not Occur in a Joint Context

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Typically, when two individuals perform a task together, each partner monitors the other partners’ responses and goals to ensure that the task is completed efficiently. This monitoring is thought to involve a co-representation of the joint goals and task, as well as a simulation of the partners’ performance. Evidence for such “co-representation” of goals and task, and “simulation” of responses has come from numerous visual attention studies in which two participants complete different components of the same task. In the present research, an adaptation of the attentional blink task was used to determine if co-representation could exert an influence over the associated attentional mechanisms. Participants completed a rapid serial visual presentation task in which they first identified a target letter (T1) and then detected the presence of the letter X (T2) presented one to seven letters after T1. In the individual condition, the participant identified T1 and then detected T2. In the joint condition, one participant identified T1 and the other participant detected T2. Across two experiments, an attentional blink (decreased accuracy in detecting T2 when presented three letters after T1) was observed in the individual condition, but not in joint conditions. A joint attentional blink may not emerge because the co-representation mechanisms that enable joint action exert a stronger influence at information processing stages that do not overlap with those that lead to the attentional blink.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers.

          When we observe someone performing an action, do our brains simulate making that action? Acquired motor skills offer a unique way to test this question, since people differ widely in the actions they have learned to perform. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study differences in brain activity between watching an action that one has learned to do and an action that one has not, in order to assess whether the brain processes of action observation are modulated by the expertise and motor repertoire of the observer. Experts in classical ballet, experts in capoeira and inexpert control subjects viewed videos of ballet or capoeira actions. Comparing the brain activity when dancers watched their own dance style versus the other style therefore reveals the influence of motor expertise on action observation. We found greater bilateral activations in premotor cortex and intraparietal sulcus, right superior parietal lobe and left posterior superior temporal sulcus when expert dancers viewed movements that they had been trained to perform compared to movements they had not. Our results show that this 'mirror system' integrates observed actions of others with an individual's personal motor repertoire, and suggest that the human brain understands actions by motor simulation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Representing others' actions: just like one's own?

              Previous research has shown that observing others' actions can affect individual performance of the same actions. In the present study, we developed a new paradigm to investigate whether and how complementary actions at the disposal of another agent are represented and influence one's own actions. A spatial compatibility task was distributed among two people so that each participant took care of one of two responses. The identical task was performed alone and alongside another participant. There was a spatial compatibility effect in the group setting only. It was similar to the effect obtained when one person took care of both responses. This result suggests that one's own actions and others' actions are represented in a functionally equivalent way.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                12 September 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1714
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada
                [3] 3Centre for Motor Control, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Roberta Sellaro, Leiden University, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Mario Dalmaso, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy; Pamela Baess, University of Hildesheim, Germany

                *Correspondence: Merryn D. Constable, merryndconstable@ 123456gmail.com Timothy N. Welsh, t.welsh@ 123456utoronto.ca

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01714
                6143683
                30258390
                c3879fdd-8d0f-48c1-9800-a8f2d6b66843
                Copyright © 2018 Constable, Pratt and Welsh.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 February 2018
                : 24 August 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 51, Pages: 11, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                attentional blink,joint action,co-representation,joint information processing,cognition,attention

                Comments

                Comment on this article