Macrolides, including erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin, are one of the
most widely used antibiotics.[1] They are commonly prescribed for acute respiratory
infections.[2] The efficacy of the long-term use of macrolides has been documented
for other chronic respiratory infections, i.e., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
and bronchiectasis.[3
4] In view of the well-known antibacterial, immunomodulatory, and potential antiviral
properties of macrolides, they are likely to have a beneficial effect on chronic asthma
and asthma exacerbations.[5]
Epidemiology studies have shown that Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection may worsen asthma
symptoms and can produce wheezing in individuals who do not have asthma.[6] Among
51 children with a first asthmatic attack, acute M. pneumoniae infection was found
in 50%. At follow-up, the patients infected with M. pneumoniae were more likely to
have recurrent asthma than those without these infections. Among infected patients,
recurrences tended to be rapid if the patient was not treated with a macrolide.[7]
The global initiative for asthma guidelines suggested to add macrolides as add-on
treatment in patients who are nonallergic asthmatics (low type II inflammation).[8]
The Saudi initiative for asthma guidelines has advocated the use of long-term macrolides
in steroid-resistant asthmatics or those who are not eligible or able to use biological
agents.[9]
Reiter et al. published a meta-analysis in 2013 on macrolides for the long-term management
of asthma.[10] They concluded that there is a significant improvement in the peak
expiratory flow, symptoms, quality of life, and airway hyperreactivity but not forced
expiratory volume in one second. However, in this study, an exacerbation was not included.
In 2015, a Cochrane systematic review was done on the use of long-term macrolides
in bronchial asthma.[11] Authors found 23 studies that had been published for the
past similar review in 2007. They reported that 1513 participants received either
macrolide or placebo. There were major concerns about the difference between methods
and results among different studies which were reflected on the quality and reliability
of the outcomes. However, the authors showed that macrolides were not better than
placebo for most of the important outcomes they looked at such as exacerbations requiring
hospital admission or treatment with oral steroids. However, they may have some benefits
on symptom scale and lung functions. There were no reports of serious side effects
of macrolides, but 16 studies did not say whether any occurred.
Brusselle et al. published a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
trial on the use of azithromycin for the prevention of exacerbations in severe asthma
known as AZISAST.[12] Over 26 weeks and using azithromycin at a dose of 250 mg twice
weekly on 109 patients, they noted a significant improvement in the Asthma Quality
of Life Questionnaire score. There was no significant difference between the control
and treated group for the primary endpoints (rate of severe exacerbations and lower
respiratory tract infections). However, when they considered only patients with noneosinophilic
asthma, there were less exacerbations in this group.
More recently, Gibson et al. have published another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
trial on the effect of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in
adults with persistent uncontrolled asthma known as AMAZES study.[13] Over 48 weeks
and using 500 mg twice a week for 420 patients, authors found that compared to placebo,
the treated group have shown a significant reduction in the number of exacerbation
rate, annual asthma exacerbations rate, and the percentage of exacerbation free days
that is better in eosinophilic patients. They also showed improved asthma-related
quality of life. The study excluded patients with hearing impairment or the QT interval
prolongation. Diarrhea was the most common side effect reported (34% in the treatment
group vs. 19% in the placebo group).
In our view, azithromycin is effective in preventing asthma exacerbations when inhaled
corticosteroids and long-acting beta 2-agonists are not enough, and the use of biologic
drugs is not feasible or ineffective. Benefits include the reduction of reported symptoms,
improved quality of life scores, and reduction of exacerbations as well as improved
pulmonary function tests. These benefits are likely to be mediated by preventing respiratory
infections, enhancing viral inactivation, and anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides.
Long-term azithromycin therapy is to be reserved for patients at highest risk for
exacerbations and preferably restricted to months of autumn and winter when most respiratory
viral infections occur. It is best used for patients with frequent exacerbations who
are not candidates for biologics therapy; for example, neutrophilic asthma, and in
situations where biologic drugs are not available or unaffordable.
The long-term antibiotics resistance is a concern and needs to be addressed in future
studies.[14] Azithromycin is a safe drug with diarrhea as the most frequently reported
side effect. Before the initiation of the drug, a precautionary measure is to exclude
patients with prolongation of QT interval and/or hearing impairment. The ideal dose
is 500 mg three times per week for 48 weeks.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.