5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consistent Failure to Produce a Cognitive Load Effect in Visual Working Memory Using a Standard Dual-Task Procedure

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Working memory performance is impaired when an attention-demanding task is executed during memory retention. The cognitive load effect is the consistent finding that the size of the memory impairment is determined by the relative amount of time that the secondary processing task occupies attention during memory retention. Cognitive load has been proposed to be a Priority-A benchmark any model of working memory should be able to explain ( Oberauer et al., 2018), in part because the effect appears to generalize across different experimental procedures and materials. Using a standard dual-task procedure, we detail four experiments using a visual working memory recall task, two requiring memory for low-level features and two requiring memory for canonical angles (up, down, left, right, etc.). In all four experiments, we failed to find a cognitive load effect, calling into question the generality of the cognitive load effect and whether it is driving forgetting in multitasking contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

          When 2 targets are presented among distractors in rapid serial visual presentation, correct identification of the 1st target results in a deficit for a 2nd target appearing within 200-500 ms. This attentional blink (AB; J.E. Raymond, K.L. Shapiro, & K.M. Arnell, 1992) was examined for categorically defined targets (letters among nonletters) in 7 experiments. AB was obtained for the 2nd letter target among digit distractors (Experiment 1) and also for a 3rd target (Experiment 2). Results of Experiments 3-5 confirmed that AB is triggered by local interference from immediate posttarget stimulation (Raymond et al., 1992) and showed that AB is modulated by the discriminability between the 1st target and the immediately following distractor. Experiments 5-7 further examined the effects of both local interference and global discriminability. A 2-stage model is proposed to account for the AB results.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans.

            This article presents a new model that accounts for working memory spans in adults, the time-based resource-sharing model. The model assumes that both components (i.e., processing and maintenance) of the main working memory tasks require attention and that memory traces decay as soon as attention is switched away. Because memory retrievals are constrained by a central bottleneck and thus totally capture attention, it was predicted that the maintenance of the items to be recalled depends on both the number of memory retrievals required by the intervening treatment and the time allowed to perform them. This number of retrievals:time ratio determines the cognitive load of the processing component. The authors show in 7 experiments that working memory spans vary as a function of this cognitive load. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory

              John Brown (1958)

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Cogn
                J Cogn
                2514-4820
                Journal of Cognition
                Ubiquity Press
                2514-4820
                10 July 2020
                2020
                : 3
                : 1
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Staten Island, City University of New York, US
                [2 ]University of Geneva, CH
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Timothy J. Ricker ( Timothy.Ricker@ 123456csi.cuny.edu )
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-5589
                Article
                10.5334/joc.108
                7350943
                31934683
                c3d66698-1dd2-4ff4-961d-9115a1808db7
                Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 April 2020
                : 23 June 2020
                Funding
                This work was completed, in part, with support from Swiss National Science Foundation Grants PZ00P1-154911 and PCEFP1_181141 to Evie Vergauwe.
                Categories
                Data Report

                working memory,short-term memory,visual memory,multitasking,cognitive load,forgetting

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log