28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Denosumab or Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Oral Bisphosphonates

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context:

          Denosumab and zoledronic acid (ZOL) are parenteral treatments for patients with osteoporosis.

          Objective:

          The objective of the study was to compare the effect of transitioning from oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or ZOL on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover.

          Design and Setting:

          This was an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial.

          Participants:

          A total of 643 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates participated in the study.

          Interventions:

          Subjects were randomized 1:1 to sc denosumab 60 mg every 6 months plus iv placebo once or ZOL 5 mg iv once plus sc placebo every 6 months for 12 months.

          Main Outcome Measures:

          Changes in BMD and bone turnover markers were measured.

          Results:

          BMD change from baseline at month 12 was significantly greater with denosumab compared with ZOL at the lumbar spine (primary end point; 3.2% vs 1.1%; P < .0001), total hip (1.9% vs 0.6%; P < .0001), femoral neck (1.2% vs −0.1%; P < .0001), and one-third radius (0.6% vs 0.0%; P < .05). The median decrease from baseline was greater with denosumab than ZOL for serum C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen at all time points after day 10 and for serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide at month 1 and at all time points after month 3 (all P < .05). Median percentage changes from baseline in serum intact PTH were significantly greater at months 3 and 9 with denosumab compared with ZOL (all P < .05). Adverse events were similar between groups. Three events consistent with the definition of atypical femoral fracture were observed (two denosumab and one ZOL).

          Conclusions:

          In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates, denosumab was associated with greater BMD increases at all measured skeletal sites and greater inhibition of bone remodeling compared with ZOL.

          Abstract

          Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioned from oral bisphosphonates had greater BMD increases and greater inhibition of bone turnover with denosumab compared with zoledronic acid.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

          Bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab reduce the risk of spine and nonspine fractures. Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) located in the subtrochanteric region and diaphysis of the femur have been reported in patients taking BPs and in patients on denosumab, but they also occur in patients with no exposure to these drugs. In this report, we review studies on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and medical management of AFFs, published since 2010. This newer evidence suggests that AFFs are stress or insufficiency fractures. The original case definition was revised to highlight radiographic features that distinguish AFFs from ordinary osteoporotic femoral diaphyseal fractures and to provide guidance on the importance of their transverse orientation. The requirement that fractures be noncomminuted was relaxed to include minimal comminution. The periosteal stress reaction at the fracture site was changed from a minor to a major feature. The association with specific diseases and drug exposures was removed from the minor features, because it was considered that these associations should be sought rather than be included in the case definition. Studies with radiographic review consistently report significant associations between AFFs and BP use, although the strength of associations and magnitude of effect vary. Although the relative risk of patients with AFFs taking BPs is high, the absolute risk of AFFs in patients on BPs is low, ranging from 3.2 to 50 cases per 100,000 person-years. However, long-term use may be associated with higher risk (∼100 per 100,000 person-years). BPs localize in areas that are developing stress fractures; suppression of targeted intracortical remodeling at the site of an AFF could impair the processes by which stress fractures normally heal. When BPs are stopped, risk of an AFF may decline. Lower limb geometry and Asian ethnicity may contribute to the risk of AFFs. There is inconsistent evidence that teriparatide may advance healing of AFFs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Osteoporosis

            The Lancet, 367(9527), 2010-2018
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

              Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, doubleblind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty-nine postmenopausal women with a T-score
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Endocrinol Metab
                J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab
                jcem
                jceme
                jcem
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
                Endocrine Society (Washington, DC )
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                August 2016
                6 June 2016
                6 June 2016
                : 101
                : 8
                : 3163-3170
                Affiliations
                Colorado Center for Bone Research (P.D.M.), Lakewood, Colorado 80277; Amgen Inc (N.P., C.W., R.B.W.), Thousand Oaks, California 91320; Laval University and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre (J.P.B.), Québec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada; Krakow Medical Center (E.C.), 31-501 Krakow, Poland; Center for Clinical and Basic Research (B.S.N.), Aalborg, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark; Bethesda Health Research Center (M.A.B.), Bethesda, Maryland 20817; Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (J.M.), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic (H.G.B.), Detroit, Michigan 48236; University of Liège (J.-Y.R.), 4000 Liège, Belgium; Georgetown University Medical Center (A.S.), Washington, DC 20007; and San Francisco Coordinating Center (S.R.C.), California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94143
                Author notes
                Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Paul Miller, MD, Colorado Center for Bone Research, 3190 South Wadsworth Boulevard, Lakewood, CO 80227. E-mail: millerccbr@ 123456aol.com .
                Article
                16-1801
                10.1210/jc.2016-1801
                4971333
                27270237
                c3db5d02-e12e-4e29-a117-f60879cb8848

                This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License (CC-BY-NC; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 April 2016
                : 1 June 2016
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article