1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Gout is commonly associated with low adherence rates, thus limiting the effectiveness of treatment. Nevertheless, informed and empowered patients may be more likely to achieve high adherence. We intend to demonstrate that adherence in clinical practice may reach that achieved in clinical trials.

          Methods

          This was a transversal study within an inception cohort of patients with gout prospectively followed up. Patients were informed at entrance in the cohort of outcomes, targets, and means to implement for successful treatment. Adherence was evaluated through electronic medication possession ratio (MPR) for urate-lowering medication and oral medications for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia for comparison. Factors associated with nonadherence, and the relation between nonadherence and serum urate levels while on treatment were analyzed.

          Results

          Data were retrieved from 336 patients, who showed a mean MPR of 87.5%, with 82.1% of patients showing MPR ≥ 0.8. Rates of adherence for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were quite similar (88%, 87%, and 83%, respectively), although MPR > 0.8 was significantly lower for oral medications for diabetes. Adherence was lower, but nevertheless quite fair, during the first year of follow-up, and increasing over time. Active follow-up and comorbidity were associated with good adherence, and adherence and long-term follow-up were associated with higher rates of achieving serum urate within therapeutic target.

          Conclusion

          Patients with gout show high rates of adherence if empowered. Active follow-up and comorbidity are associated with high rates of adherence. Adherence is strongly associated with higher rates of achievement of therapeutic serum urate target.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout.

          New drugs and new evidence concerning the use of established treatments have become available since the publication of the first European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of gout, in 2006. This situation has prompted a systematic review and update of the 2006 recommendations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout

            To provide guidance for the management of gout, including indications for and optimal use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT), treatment of gout flares, and lifestyle and other medication recommendations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial

              Summary Background In the UK, gout management is suboptimum, with only 40% of patients receiving urate-lowering therapy, usually without titration to achieve a target serum urate concentration. Nurses successfully manage many diseases in primary care. We compared nurse-led gout care to usual care led by general practitioners (GPs) for people in the community. Methods Research nurses were trained in best practice management of gout, including providing individualised information and engaging patients in shared decision making. Adults who had experienced a gout flare in the previous 12 months were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive nurse-led care or continue with GP-led usual care. We assessed patients at baseline and after 1 and 2 years. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants who achieved serum urate concentrations less than 360 μmol/L (6 mg/dL) at 2 years. Secondary outcomes were flare frequency in year 2, presence of tophi, quality of life, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated based on intention to treat with multiple imputation. This study is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01477346. Findings 517 patients were enrolled, of whom 255 were assigned nurse-led care and 262 usual care. Nurse-led care was associated with high uptake of and adherence to urate-lowering therapy. More patients receiving nurse-led care had serum urate concentrations less than 360 μmol/L at 2 years than those receiving usual care (95% vs 30%, RR 3·18, 95% CI 2·42–4·18, p<0·0001). At 2 years all secondary outcomes favoured the nurse-led group. The cost per QALY gained for the nurse-led intervention was £5066 at 2 years. Interpretation Nurse-led gout care is efficacious and cost-effective compared with usual care. Our findings illustrate the benefits of educating and engaging patients in gout management and reaffirm the importance of a treat-to-target urate-lowering treatment strategy to improve patient-centred outcomes. Funding Arthritis Research UK.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fernando.perezruiz@osakidetza.eus
                Journal
                Rheumatol Ther
                Rheumatol Ther
                Rheumatology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2198-6576
                2198-6584
                28 October 2020
                28 October 2020
                December 2020
                : 7
                : 4
                : 1011-1019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411232.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1767 5135, Rheumatology Division, Osakidetza, OSI-EE Cruces, , Cruces University Hospital, ; Barakaldo, Spain
                [2 ]BioCruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
                [3 ]GRID grid.11480.3c, ISNI 0000000121671098, Department of Medicine, Medicine and Nursing School, , University of the Basque Country, ; Biscay,, Spain
                [4 ]GRID grid.11480.3c, ISNI 0000000121671098, Medicine and Nursing School, , University of the Basque Country, ; Biscay, Spain
                [5 ]Rheumatology Department and Inserm URM 1132, Centre Viggo Petersen, Hôpital Lariboisière (AP-HP), and Université Paris Diderot, USPC, Paris, France
                [6 ]GRID grid.10049.3c, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9692, Nephrology Division, Health Research Institute, Graduate Entry Medical School, University Hospital Limerick, , University of Limerick, ; Limerick, Ireland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5268-1894
                Article
                249
                10.1007/s40744-020-00249-w
                7695758
                33111171
                c3fb4820-cc43-4bf5-b0b3-d349d920039c
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 28 September 2020
                : 19 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Cruces Hospital Rheumatology Association
                Award ID: 2019-1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                adherence,gout,treatment
                adherence, gout, treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article