68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    9
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risk factors for immediate postpolypectomy bleeding of the colon: a multicenter study.

      The American Journal of Gastroenterology
      Aged, Chi-Square Distribution, Colonic Polyps, diagnosis, surgery, Colonoscopy, adverse effects, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, epidemiology, etiology, Humans, Incidence, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aims of this prospective study were to document the incidence of colon immediate postpolypectomy bleeding (IPPB) according to grade, and to identify potential risk factors of IPPB in patients who have received complete colonoscopy and polypectomy because of a colorectal polyp. This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of 5,152 patients treated at 11 tertiary medical centers between July 2003 and July 2004. Patient-related, polyp-related, and procedure-related variables were evaluated as potential risk factors for IPPB. IPPB was defined as a bleeding occurring during the procedure and was graded as G1-G4. Risk factors associated with IPPB were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 9,336 colonic polyps were removed in 5,152 patients, and 262 (2.8%) colorectal polyps in 215 patients presented with IPPB. Polyp-based multivariate analysis revealed that old age (>or=65 yr), comorbid cardiovascular or chronic renal disease, anticoagulant use, polyp size greater than 1 cm, gross morphology of polyps such as pedunculated polyp or laterally spreading tumor, poorer bowel preparation, cutting mode of the electrosurgical current, and the inadvertent cutting of a polyp before current application were significant risk factors for IPPB. Nine factors have been found to be associated with IPPB and polypectomy should be undertaken with caution under these conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy.

          Clinically significant hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy may occur primarily as the polyp is removed or manifest itself days to weeks later secondary to clot dissolution. The rate of hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy ranges widely from 0.3 to 6.1 percent, depending on whether the data are derived from studies using the number of patients or number of polypectomies. A retrospective study was performed in our institution to study 4,721 patients who underwent polypectomy between January 1987 and December 1991. Twenty (0.4 percent) of these patients required hospital admission because of 9 primary and 11 delayed hemorrhages. Fifty-four polyps were removed from these patients: 11 in the right colon, 7 in the transverse colon, 17 in the descending colon, and 19 in the sigmoid colon. Eight polyps were 2 cm or larger, 10 were pedunculated, and 44 were sessile. Six patients underwent cauterization or resnaring of the bleeding polyp site, one patient underwent subtotal colectomy, and the remainder of the patients stopped bleeding spontaneously. Factors that could be associated with the outcome of hemorrhage include patient age, size, location, number and morphology of polyps (i.e., sessile or thick stalk), and use of anticoagulants. An experienced endoscopist with knowledge of electrosurgical and technical principles may be the most important factor for prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Postpolypectomy lower gastrointestinal bleeding: potential role of aspirin.

            Limited data exist on the role of aspirin in increasing the risk of clinically significant postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB), which is defined as lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage following colonoscopic polyp removal requiring transfusion, hospitalization, endoscopic intervention, angiography, or surgery. To determine if aspirin use prior to colonoscopy increases the risk of clinically significant PPB. A case-control study of patients with clinically significant PPB at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale and Rochester was performed. Information collected included age, gender, recent use of aspirin or NSAIDs (within three days of colonoscopy), polyp characteristics, and polypectomy technique. The control group consisted of patients matched for age (+/-3 yr), gender, and cardiovascular morbidity who had undergone polypectomy without any complications. The populations were compared to determine the odds ratio (OR) of PPB with aspirin use. During the study period, 20,636 patients underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy at the two institutions and 101 patients presented with clinically significant PPB. Twenty patients were excluded from analysis because of prior anticoagulant use. The remaining 81 patients were matched to 81 patients who had undergone colonoscopy without complications. The two groups were comparable in terms of polyp size (97%< or = 10 mm, bleeding group; 95%< or = 10 mm, control group). Aspirin use prior to polypectomy was 40% in the bleeding group and 33% in the control group (OR 1.41; 95% C.I. 0.68 to 3.04). Postpolypectomy bleeding is an uncommon but important complication of endoscopic polypectomy. There was no statistically relevant difference in prior aspirin use before polypectomy in the bleeding group and the matched controls.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy.

              Residual adenoma is frequently found at the site of endoscopically resected large sessile adenomas on follow-up examination. We evaluated the efficacy of a thermal energy source, the argon plasma coagulator, to destroy visible residual adenoma after piecemeal resection of sessile polyps. Seventy-seven piecemeal polypectomies with or without the use of argon plasma coagulator were analyzed retrospectively. All polyps were sessile, 20 mm or greater in size. The results from three groups of patients were compared. The study group was composed of patients who had visible residual adenoma after piecemeal polypectomy and had the base of the polypectomy site treated with the argon plasma coagulator. The first comparison group consisted of patients who underwent standard piecemeal polypectomy in whom the colonoscopist thought that all adenomatous tissue was removed and no further treatment was necessary. The second comparison group included patients in whom visible residual adenoma was left at the base after piecemeal resection of large adenomas. Follow-up colonoscopy was performed approximately 6 months after the initial procedure to check for recurrent/residual adenomatous tissue. The argon plasma coagulator was used after 30 piecemeal polypectomies in an attempt to eradicate visible residual adenomatous tissue; at follow-up, 50% of these cases had complete eradication of adenoma. The group in whom all visible tumor was removed by piecemeal polypectomy alone had an adenoma eradication rate of 54% on follow-up colonoscopy. In the patients in whom visible residual adenoma was left at the site the recurrence rate was 100% on the follow-up examination. Bleeding necessitating endoscopic therapy occurred once (3.3%) in the argon plasma coagulator group; there were four (12.5%) bleeding episodes and one (3.1%) confined retroperitoneal perforation in the complete piecemeal polypectomy group and no complications in the group in which polypectomy was incomplete. Argon plasma coagulator ablation of residual adenomatous tissue at the polypectomy base is safe and useful. It helps to complete the eradication of large sessile polyps when there is visible evidence of residual polyp.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Comments

                Comment on this article