17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A survey of the attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about medical cannabis among primary care providers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Healthcare providers play a critical role in facilitating patient access to medical cannabis. However, previous surveys suggest only a minority of providers believe that medical cannabis confers benefits to patients. Significant new knowledge about the potential benefits and harms of medical cannabis has recently emerged. Understanding current attitudes and beliefs of providers may provide insight into the ongoing challenges they face as states expand access to medical cannabis.

          Methods

          We conducted an electronic survey of primary care providers in a large Minnesota-based healthcare system between January 23 and February 5, 2018. We obtained information about provider characteristics, attitudes and beliefs about medical cannabis, provider comfort level in answering patient questions about medical cannabis, and whether providers were interested in receiving additional education.

          Results

          Sixty-two providers completed the survey (response rate 31%; 62/199). Seventy-six percent of respondents were physicians and the average age was 46.3 years. A majority of providers believed (“strongly agree” or “somewhat agree”) that medical cannabis was a legitimate medical therapy (58.1%) and 38.7% believed that providers should be offering to patients for managing medical conditions. A majority (> 50%) of providers believed that medical cannabis was helpful for treating the qualifying medical conditions of cancer, terminal illness, and intractable pain. A majority of providers did not know if medical cannabis was effective for managing nearly one-half of the other state designated qualifying medical conditions. Few believed that medical cannabis improved quality of life domains. Over one-third of providers believed that medical cannabis interacted with medical therapies. One-half of providers were not ready to or did not want to answer patient questions about medical cannabis, and the majority of providers wanted to learn more about it.

          Conclusions

          Healthcare providers generally believe that medical cannabis is a legitimate medical therapy. Provider knowledge gaps about the effectiveness of medical cannabis for state designated qualifying conditions need to be addressed, and accurate information about the potential for drug interactions needs to be disseminated to address provider concerns. Clinical trial data about how medical cannabis improves patient quality of life domains is desperately needed as this information can impact clinical decision-making.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0906-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

          Cannabis and cannabinoid drugs are widely used to treat disease or alleviate symptoms, but their efficacy for specific indications is not clear.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

            This article presents information about the development and evaluation of the SF-36 Health Survey, a 36-item generic measure of health status. It summarizes studies of reliability and validity and provides administrative and interpretation guidelines for the SF-36. A brief history of the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project is also included.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Inhaled Cannabis for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data

              Chronic neuropathic pain, the most frequent condition affecting the peripheral nervous system, remains underdiagnosed and difficult to treat. Inhaled cannabis may alleviate chronic neuropathic pain. Our objective was to synthesize the evidence on the use of inhaled cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of individual patient data. We registered our protocol with PROSPERO CRD42011001182. We searched in Cochrane Central, PubMed, EMBASE, and AMED. We considered all randomized controlled trials investigating chronic painful neuropathy and comparing inhaled cannabis with placebo. We pooled treatment effects following a hierarchical random-effects Bayesian responder model for the population-averaged subject-specific effect. Our evidence synthesis of individual patient data from 178 participants with 405 observed responses in 5 randomized controlled trials following patients for days to weeks provides evidence that inhaled cannabis results in short-term reductions in chronic neuropathic pain for 1 in every 5 to 6 patients treated (number needed to treat = 5.6 with a Bayesian 95% credible interval ranging between 3.4 and 14). Our inferences were insensitive to model assumptions, priors, and parameter choices. We caution that the small number of studies and participants, the short follow-up, shortcomings in allocation concealment, and considerable attrition limit the conclusions that can be drawn from the review. The Bayes factor is 332, corresponding to a posterior probability of effect of 99.7%.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (507) 284-5568 , ebbert.jon@mayo.edu
                Journal
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Family Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2296
                22 January 2019
                22 January 2019
                2019
                : 20
                : 17
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0459 167X, GRID grid.66875.3a, Department of Medicine, , Mayo Clinic, ; 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0459 167X, GRID grid.66875.3a, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Mayo Clinic Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, , Mayo Clinic, ; 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-3704
                Article
                906
                10.1186/s12875-019-0906-y
                6341534
                30669979
                c42deab8-7e02-44d2-bbcb-e5561aea1954
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 June 2018
                : 10 January 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000871, Mayo Clinic;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Medicine
                cannabis,medical marijuana,health care surveys,primary care physicians,primary care
                Medicine
                cannabis, medical marijuana, health care surveys, primary care physicians, primary care

                Comments

                Comment on this article