15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does schema therapy change schemas and symptoms? A systematic review across mental health disorders

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Schema therapy was first applied to individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) over 20 years ago, and more recent work has suggested efficacy across a range of disorders. The present review aimed to systematically synthesize evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness of schema therapy in reducing early maladaptive schema (EMS) and improving symptoms as applied to a range of mental health disorders in adults including BPD, other personality disorders, eating disorders, anxiety disorders, and post‐traumatic stress disorder.

          Methods

          Studies were identified through electronic searches ( EMBASE, Psyc INFO, MEDLINE from 1990 to January 2016).

          Results

          The search produced 835 titles, of which 12 studies were found to meet inclusion criteria. A significant number of studies of schema therapy treatment were excluded as they failed to include a measure of schema change. The Clinical Trial Assessment Measure was used to rate the methodological quality of studies. Schema change and disorder‐specific symptom change was found in 11 of the 12 studies.

          Conclusions

          Schema therapy has demonstrated initial significant results in terms of reducing EMS and improving symptoms for personality disorders, but formal mediation analytical studies are lacking and rigorous evidence for other mental health disorders is currently sparse.

          Practitioner points

          • First review to investigate whether schema therapy leads to reduced maladaptive schemas and symptoms across mental health disorders.

          • Limited evidence for schema change with schema therapy in borderline personality disorder ( BPD), with only three studies conducting correlational analyses.

          • Evidence for schema and symptom change in other mental health disorders is sparse, and so use of schema therapy for disorders other than BPD should be based on service user/patient preference and clinical expertise and/or that the theoretical underpinnings of schema therapy justify the use of it therapeutically.

          • Further work is needed to develop the evidence base for schema therapy for other disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes.

          Cognitive remediation therapy for schizophrenia was developed to treat cognitive problems that affect functioning, but the treatment effects may depend on the type of trial methodology adopted. The present meta-analysis will determine the effects of treatment and whether study method or potential moderators influence the estimates. Electronic databases were searched up to June 2009 using variants of the key words "cognitive," "training," "remediation," "clinical trial," and "schizophrenia." Key researchers were contacted to ensure that all studies meeting the criteria were included. This produced 109 reports of 40 studies in which ≥70% of participants had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, all of whom received standard care. There was a comparison group and allocation procedure in these studies. Data were available to calculate effect sizes on cognition and/or functioning. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers with excellent reliability. Methodological moderators were extracted through the Clinical Trials Assessment Measure and verified by authors in 94% of cases. The meta-analysis (2,104 participants) yielded durable effects on global cognition and functioning. The symptom effect was small and disappeared at follow-up assessment. No treatment element (remediation approach, duration, computer use, etc.) was associated with cognitive outcome. Cognitive remediation therapy was more effective when patients were clinically stable. Significantly stronger effects on functioning were found when cognitive remediation therapy was provided together with other psychiatric rehabilitation, and a much larger effect was present when a strategic approach was adopted together with adjunctive rehabilitation. Despite variability in methodological rigor, this did not moderate any of the therapy effects, and even in the most rigorous studies there were similar small-to-moderate effects. Cognitive remediation benefits people with schizophrenia, and when combined with psychiatric rehabilitation, this benefit generalizes to functioning, relative to rehabilitation alone. These benefits cannot be attributed to poor study methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Schizophrenia: Effect Sizes, Clinical Models, and Methodological Rigor

              Background: Guidance in the United States and United Kingdom has included cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBTp) as a preferred therapy. But recent advances have widened the CBTp targets to other symptoms and have different methods of provision, eg, in groups. Aim: To explore the effect sizes of current CBTp trials including targeted and nontargeted symptoms, modes of action, and effect of methodological rigor. Method: Thirty-four CBTp trials with data in the public domain were used as source data for a meta-analysis and investigation of the effects of trial methodology using the Clinical Trial Assessment Measure (CTAM). Results: There were overall beneficial effects for the target symptom (33 studies; effect size = 0.400 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.252, 0.548]) as well as significant effects for positive symptoms (32 studies), negative symptoms (23 studies), functioning (15 studies), mood (13 studies), and social anxiety (2 studies) with effects ranging from 0.35 to 0.44. However, there was no effect on hopelessness. Improvements in one domain were correlated with improvements in others. Trials in which raters were aware of group allocation had an inflated effect size of approximately 50%–100%. But rigorous CBTp studies showed benefit (estimated effect size = 0.223; 95% CI = 0.017, 0.428) although the lower end of the CI should be noted. Secondary outcomes (eg, negative symptoms) were also affected such that in the group of methodologically adequate studies the effect sizes were not significant. Conclusions: As in other meta-analyses, CBTp had beneficial effect on positive symptoms. However, psychological treatment trials that make no attempt to mask the group allocation are likely to have inflated effect sizes. Evidence considered for psychological treatment guidance should take into account specific methodological detail.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                chrisdjtaylor@nhs.net
                Journal
                Psychol Psychother
                Psychol Psychother
                10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8341
                PAPT
                Psychology and Psychotherapy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1476-0835
                2044-8341
                30 December 2016
                September 2017
                : 90
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/papt.2017.90.issue-3 )
                : 456-479
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Early Intervention Psychosis Service Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust Chorley UK
                [ 2 ] Division of Psychology and Mental Health School of Health Sciences University of Manchester UK
                [ 3 ] Division of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work School of Health Sciences University of Manchester UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence should be addressed to Christopher D. J. Taylor, Early Intervention Psychosis Service, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Euxton Lodge, 16 Euxton Lane, Chorley PR7 1PS, UK (email: chrisdjtaylor@ 123456nhs.net ).
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-883X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-0400
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-5774
                Article
                PAPT12112
                10.1111/papt.12112
                5573974
                28035734
                c4416cb7-727f-4c69-85b3-2f77908659d2
                © 2016 The Authors. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the British Psychological Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 18 February 2016
                : 24 October 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Pages: 24, Words: 9954
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
                Award ID: DRF‐2012‐05‐211
                Funded by: Department of Health
                Categories
                Review Paper
                Review Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                papt12112
                September 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.8 mode:remove_FC converted:29.08.2017

                schema therapy,review,early maladaptive schemas,symptoms,schema modes

                Comments

                Comment on this article